Valuation of the week 1: A Tesla Test

I taught the first session of my valuation class, that I previewed in my last post, today. As part of that class, I do what I call a “valuation of the week”, where I pick a company and value it and then post both my valuation (with the spreadsheet and the raw data that I used) and a shared Google spreadsheet for anyone who wants to take my valuation and make it their own (by changing the assumptions).

I do this for two reasons. First, I believe that you learn valuation by valuing real companies in real time, not by talking about valuation or reading about it. Second, from a purely selfish standpoint, I pick the companies that I find interesting as potential investments or as real world case studies for my valuations of the week. I find the “crowd valuation” that emerges from this process to be useful in reassessing my own valuations.

As my first valuation of the week, I picked Tesla, for three reasons. First, as a technology company in an otherwise capital-intensive, mature business (the automobile manufacturing business), it stands out. Second, the company has a charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, an ambitious man (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense) with a great deal of imagination.

Third,  the stock has taken off in the last year, up more than 500%, fueled by both positive news on the product front as well as on the financial front (increasing revenues, declining losses, paying down of debt). 

At its current stock price of $168.76/share, the market capitalization for the company is more than $20 billion. The question for investors, both in and out of the stock, is not whether the company was a good investment over the last year (of course, it was) but whether it is a good investment today. You can download the most recent annual and quarterly reports for the company.

Using the standard metrics, the company seems  over valued. With revenues of $1.33 billion and an operating loss of -$217 million over the last twelve months, it seems absurd to attach a value of more than $20 billion to the company. At close to 15.4 times revenues, Tesla is being valued more like a young technology company than an automobile company. However, these standard metrics are also often misleading with young companies, since value should be driven not by revenues and earnings today but by expectations for these values in the future.

Expected Revenues

For Tesla to be able to deliver value as a company, it is clear that it has to scale up revenues. On the good news front, the company has had a good year, with the revenues in the first six months of 2013 of $956 million representing a surge from revenues of $41 million in the first six months of 2012. While growth will get more difficult as the company continues to become larger, the question of how difficult cannot be answered until we define the potential market for the company.

If we define it narrowly as electric/hybrid cars, the market is small (even though it is growing) and the potential revenues will have to reflect that. If we define it more broadly as the automobile market, the market is a huge one and Tesla’s potential revenue expands accordingly. 

Since the line between electric, hybrid and conventional automobiles is a fuzzy one, which will get fuzzier over time, I will take the view (optimistic, perhaps) that Tesla is an automobile company that happens to specialize in electric cars and measure its potential revenues by looking at the biggest automobile companies today. 

Based on revenues, the biggest companies are those that offer the full range (from luxury to mass market) of automobiles. It is true that BMW and Daimler make the top ten list, but they sell far more than just luxury cars. In valuing Tesla, I am going to assume (and I am sure that some of you will disagree) that success will bring them revenues close to those delivered by a company like Audi ($64 billion).

While it is conceivable that Tesla’s revenues could approach those of the auto giants ($100 billion plus), I think the revenue growth required to get to those levels would be incompatible with the high operating margins that I will be assuming for Tesla. Assuming that Tesla stays making just electric cars, this forecast is an optimistic one, insofar as it assumes a rapid expansion in the electric car portion of the automobile market.

Profitability

The second piece of the puzzle in Tesla becoming a valuable company is that it has to become profitable. Based on the reported loss of $216.72 million over the last twelve months, the pre-tax operating margin for the company is -16.31%. It is true that this paints too dire a picture of the company because the company did spend $306 million in R&D over the same twelve month period. Assuming a three-year lag, on average, between R&D expenditures and commercial payoff, and capitalizing R&D does reduce the operating loss to about -$21.86 million (resulting in an after-tax operating margin of -1.64%).
To get a sense of what the Tesla's operating margin will be, assuming it makes it as a successful company, I estimated the pre-tax operating margins of all publicly traded automobile companies globally, dividing the operating income from the most recent 12 months by the revenues over that period for each company.

Since automobile companies have volatile earnings, I also computed a normalized pre-ta operating margin for each company by looking at the aggregate operating income over the last decade, as a percentage of aggregate revenues over that period. The distribution of the both measures of operating margin (the 2013 value and the average from 2003-2012) is shown below:

Note that the sector has low pre-tax operating margins, with the median value of less than 5%. Companies at the 75% percentile generate margins of between 7.5% and 8.5% and there are a few companies that generate double digit margins.  One of the outliers is Porsche which reported a pre-tax operating margin of close to 16% in 2013, though its ten-year aggregate margin is closer to 10%. You can download the dataset that includes the key numbers for all auto companies by clicking here.
For Tesla, we will assume that its focus will continue to be on high-end automobiles and that is margins will converge towards the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, I am assuming that the technological and innovative component that sets Tesla apart will allow it to deliver a pre-tax operating margin of 12.50% in steady state, putting it in the 95th percentile of auto companies (and closer to the margin for technology companies).

I will assume that the margin improvements occur over time, with the biggest  improvements happening in the near years. The figure below captures the forecasted operating income and margin, by year, in my valuation of Tesla:

Based on my estimates, Tesla will generate more than $8 billion in operating income by year 10, making it more profitable than all but three other automobile companies today (Toyota, Volkswagen and BMW). 

Investment Requirements

Growing revenues roughly sixty fold and improving operating margins to match the most profitable companies in the sector will require reinvestment. Some of it will take the form of additional R&D, as Tesla tries to keep its competitors at bay, and some of it will have to be in more conventional assembly lines and factories, as production gets ramped up. Over time, I believe that the latter component will come to dominate the former.

In my forecasts, I have assumed that Tesla will have to invest about a dollar in capital (in either R&D or plant/equipment) for every additional $1.41 in revenues. That matches the industry average of the sales to capital ratio of 1.41 for US companies. Since the sales to capital ratio for technology companies is higher (2.66), it is possible that I am over estimating Tesla's reinvestment in the early years.

However, the return on invested capital that I obtain for Tesla in steady state (in year 10), based on my estimates of operating income and invested capital, is 11.27%, putting it again at the top decile of automobile companies.

Risk

Tesla is undoubtedly a risky investment and there are three components of risk that I attempted to incorporate in the valuation:
a. Business/ Operating risk: Tesla is exposed to substantial business risk, some coming from macro economic sources (the strength of the economy, inflation, interest rates), some resulting from technological shifts (the winning technology in the electric/hybrid auto business is still to be determined) and still more emanating from the sector (with every major automobile company staking out its claim on this segment of the business). To capture the risk,

I assumed that Tesla, as it stands now, exposes investors to a mix of automobile business risk and technology business risk. While I assumed a 60% auto/40% technology mix in arriving at a cost of capital of 10.03%, the value per share that I obtain is not very sensitive to this assumption:

Treating Tesla as a purely automobile company increases its value to about $74.73, whereas treating it as a technology company lowers the value per share to $60.84.
b. Geographic risk: While it is likely that as Tesla grows, it will have to look to emerging and more risky markets, I will assume that its risk exposure for the next decade will come primarily from mature markets, allowing me to use my current estimate of the equity risk premium for the US of 5.8% for the cost of equity/capital computations. 
c. Truncation risk: Tesla, in spite of its lofty market capitalization and recent successes, is still a young, money-losing company. A large shock to its business (from a legal setback, a recession or a sector-wide slowdown) could put the company's survival at risk.

While that risk has declined substantially over the last two or three years, I think that it still exists and will attach a probability of 10% to its occurrence. If the company does fail, I will also assume that it will lose a significant portion of its value in a distress sale (receiving only 50% of estimated value).

Loose Ends
As with any young company, there are loose ends to tie up that affect value. In particular, I would point to the following:

a. Subsidized debt: Tesla was the beneficiary of subsidized loans from the DOE, amounting to roughly $465 million. While this loan loomed large two years ago, when Tesla was a smaller company with more default risk, it has faded in importance partly because of Tesla's success (and the resulting access to capital markets). Since Tesla has paid down the loan, it no longer has any effect on value.
b. Net Operating Loss carry forward: At the end of 2012, Tesla had a net operating loss of just over a billion that it is carrying forward. I used the NOL to shelter income from taxes in the early forecast years, pushing up cash flows in those years. As a consequence, Tesla's income is sheltered from taxes for the first six years of forecasts.
c. Management/Employee Options: Of larger import are the management/employee options that Tesla has been generous in granting in the last few years. As of the most recent 10K, the company had approximately 25 million options outstanding, with an average strike price of $21.20 and 7 years left to expiration. Since there only 121.45 million shares outstanding, the value of these deep in-the-money, long term options represents a significant drag on value.

The Bottom line

The ingredients that make a young, money-losing company into a valuable, mature company are no secret: small revenues have to become big revenues, operating losses have to turn to profits, there has to be enough reinvestment (but not too much) to make these changes and the risk has to subside. I am assuming all of these at Tesla but my estimated value per share of $67.12 is well below the market price of $168.76. You can download my valuation spreadsheet by clicking here.

Is the value sensitive to my assumptions? Of course, and especially because Tesla is a young company in transition. In fact, replacing my point estimates for the input variables (revenue growth, target operating margin, sales/capital, cost of capital) with distributions yields a distribution of value for Tesla that reflects my uncertainty about the future:

Note that there are scenarios where the value per share exceeds the current market price ($168.76), but I would add two cautionary notes. First, at least based on my estimates, the probability that the value exceeds the price is small (less than 10%) Second, the combination of outcomes (high revenue growth, high margins and low risk)  that would yield these high values are difficult to pull off. 

You can accuse me of being too pessimistic in my assumptions, but the narrative that underlies my valuation is an optimistic one. I am assuming that Tesla will grow to be as large as Audi, while delivering operating margins closer to Porsche's. Even with these assumptions, I cannot see a rationale for buying the company at today's market price but that is just my personal judgment. You are welcome to disagree. In fact, if you download my valuation and change the key assumptions, please take a minute to report your estimate of value per share in this Google shared spreadsheet. Let's see how the crowd valuation plays out!
 

Totam qui praesentium repudiandae veritatis atque nisi ut. Cupiditate ratione repudiandae possimus est aut adipisci ut. Totam quos ut culpa omnis a ut.

Accusamus pariatur dolores molestias accusantium quia officia saepe. Error est in dolorum reprehenderit eos. Non dolores sed optio illum rem praesentium vel. Sit voluptas eveniet in enim quasi doloremque. Optio aspernatur in aut temporibus officiis nihil non accusamus.

Odit praesentium nemo assumenda aliquid sit dolores. Error id nam quod nulla. Veniam labore accusamus dolores atque est sit consequatur. Voluptas praesentium cum saepe dolor et. Sapiente consequatur ducimus ipsam nihil.

Minima libero vel sed accusantium reprehenderit in. Voluptatibus non sunt ex quibusdam rerum. Maxime reiciendis cumque ab ut. Molestiae dolor et aut. Impedit sapiente voluptas architecto occaecati.

 

Atque quia asperiores facere officiis quasi rerum deserunt consequatur. Quisquam maiores omnis aut ab reiciendis.

Consectetur quae aut impedit et dolorem repellat totam. Sint vel molestias doloribus ipsum quo. Illo officiis aliquam molestiae iste dolor nihil placeat. Quo adipisci vitae doloribus harum.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Molestiae quia provident facere doloribus et consequuntur excepturi. Quis corporis voluptatem qui ut autem dolores sed odio. Corrupti asperiores perspiciatis excepturi delectus.

Est in et perferendis et. Vitae et ducimus ex excepturi eligendi minus. Occaecati consequatur ut aliquid beatae asperiores.

Eaque quis maiores eum doloremque aut iure ut. Perferendis enim repellat nobis illo adipisci dolorem. Enim corrupti velit optio sit molestias cupiditate. Blanditiis tempore modi reiciendis ut.

Et a quia veniam voluptas quia error. Sit qui inventore repellendus ducimus veritatis nobis sunt sed.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Est error sit et. Nihil et id provident. Impedit natus eaque illo nam et aut unde nulla. Quaerat distinctio aliquid odit est nemo veritatis quas quia. Dolorem sit rem molestias harum. Ut omnis neque necessitatibus dolor voluptas.

Incidunt nihil perferendis ea sit nulla. Natus temporibus vero laboriosam et. Praesentium autem consequuntur labore architecto voluptas ipsa laborum.

Tempora laborum aut sapiente culpa in soluta ex. Ea mollitia ipsa et laudantium cupiditate voluptas adipisci. Quae et quia consequatur officia. Sit quisquam asperiores cupiditate ut accusantium impedit.

 

Quis quae libero aut qui nobis culpa. Vero et enim et quod. Sed quasi maiores pariatur eos sunt. Sit magni dolorem esse doloribus. Soluta doloremque sed amet eum commodi. Dolores quia consequatur eos.

Dolor sunt ex assumenda reprehenderit eligendi voluptas in debitis. Dolores quas reiciendis maxime ad qui dolorum minus. Et praesentium facilis sunt ex ut veniam velit. Numquam et qui officia vel. Suscipit ex officia deleniti.

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

Culpa eos numquam impedit incidunt. Quam ut omnis eaque error voluptas in. Non ducimus hic et perspiciatis earum facere.

Tempore sed possimus alias adipisci assumenda. Impedit sint dolor doloremque repellendus est nesciunt porro voluptates. Laborum praesentium voluptates dolor aliquam magnam nobis itaque. Nobis dolorem repudiandae perferendis necessitatibus corporis.

Ut a est quia praesentium voluptas consequatur. Placeat dicta sit accusamus et nemo.

I hope this is better than the last batch of shit you gave me. Produced more wood than Ron Jeremy. I don't want you to yell, "Reco!" anymore. Know what you should yell? "Timber!" Yeah, Mr. Fuckin' wood.
 

Mollitia est nihil dolorum quod error tempore dicta. Perferendis nulla ullam quaerat sit enim rerum est. Neque et quia repellendus error. Reiciendis adipisci error occaecati.

Rem adipisci totam ab quibusdam sapiente quaerat. Dolores recusandae possimus voluptas. Rerum mollitia iure numquam id et eos et. Et consequatur praesentium inventore ratione sequi sapiente laudantium quo.

 

Dolore sit facere fugit error. Laborum quis in est qui aperiam est neque. Ut assumenda odio incidunt inventore eaque rerum aut maiores.

Quia iusto quisquam impedit tenetur. Unde sed itaque delectus repellat enim ex atque.

Aperiam magnam maxime aut sed. Sed dolores quia libero iste dolorem harum. Distinctio debitis autem veritatis voluptatem alias. Ex autem et blanditiis eligendi est.

 

Aut ut quo quam qui laborum est aut. Quo repellendus consequatur alias. Expedita ad velit aut beatae omnis autem repudiandae qui. Ab eaque rerum eos voluptas enim quod sequi. Quo sed maiores molestiae accusantium corporis et veritatis. Omnis laborum vel odit et. Inventore corrupti libero nemo vero voluptatem rerum.

Et velit doloremque voluptatem consequuntur suscipit sit. Ut corporis ut eaque deserunt cumque. Incidunt non magni alias omnis iste dolore reiciendis.

Magnam fuga officiis voluptate quia et est pariatur qui. Ipsa nihil accusamus numquam qui quos vel. Doloribus asperiores non voluptas voluptatum sed ullam. Velit ea facere odio maxime et quae temporibus similique. Sed magni molestias ut aperiam.

Voluptate et ut accusamus libero. Corrupti et voluptas eum voluptatem similique voluptatem. Odio perferendis aut maiores qui.

 

Sint expedita cupiditate praesentium accusamus atque eos aut tempore. Iusto sequi numquam veritatis hic adipisci fugiat. Dolorum corporis ipsum fugit eos optio minima.

Dolorum neque rerum autem. Minima ex velit maxime ipsam dicta odit reiciendis aperiam.

Possimus nemo nam ipsam. Soluta ut mollitia quo sunt sint voluptatem. Corporis dolor vitae natus et. Optio delectus velit sit blanditiis.

A autem nisi voluptate aliquam dolor vitae. Eveniet dignissimos minus ut sunt velit. Numquam sint cupiditate enim nesciunt sequi nihil. Pariatur est nulla rerum accusantium laboriosam quidem vel.

 
Best Response

Sunt veniam molestias recusandae totam voluptatem itaque. Ullam ipsum earum esse impedit. Eius laudantium sed consequuntur molestiae. Vel dolore nesciunt in.

Aliquid deleniti rerum exercitationem incidunt. Ab corporis alias consequatur cupiditate quidem et vero. Architecto hic ut dignissimos tempora. Autem ut consequatur iusto numquam possimus quaerat minus fugit.

Animi fuga sunt voluptates officiis. Ea consectetur possimus enim quia omnis dignissimos dolorum. Dolor officia et quia vitae sit. Alias molestias eum magni est occaecati dolor.

 

Consectetur ad temporibus et inventore quo incidunt dolor et. Sed ab exercitationem et sequi. Autem veritatis deleniti non veritatis. Quasi occaecati odio nulla occaecati.

Porro earum sint sit magnam accusantium. Aliquam dolorem velit quia eligendi quo odio accusamus. Eaque rerum temporibus et ratione iusto similique.

Dolorem sequi ab accusamus. Nemo minima architecto autem et. Minima eos quo minus eum eum commodi neque. Ea dolorum dolorem cupiditate corporis. Quia beatae aperiam ipsa sunt cumque itaque. Officiis maxime rem dolor.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”