Waddell & Reed and the flash crash hypocrisy

Halloween's only three weeks away and we have a brand new witch to hunt. By now, everyone has heard of Waddell & Reed and how the Kansas City mutual fund is reason du jour for the end of capitalism and further legalizing of market manipulation.

As the story goes, on the afternoon of May 6, 2010 an algorithm propelled sell-off of $4.1 billion of futures contracts linked to the S&P 500 sent the market reeling. As with all good witch hunts, Waddell hasn't officially been named, but via leakage that would make the BP oil spill seem tame in comparison, we have our new villain.

I can hear the sound of Blankfein's cheeks stretching into a grin. It sounds like press on nails on a chalkboard.

The fund's leading trader is named Michael Avery. Remember that name, whether it will reach the Hall of Shame depths of Jerome Kerviel and Bradley Birkenfield, nobody can say for sure. But he's definitely the next big scapegoat of the roundabout finger-pointing routine that has become our daily reality. Anybody seen Groundhog Day with Bill Murray, lately?

Good flick, reminds me of our financial news over the past year.

Waddell is being painted as "the mutual fund which traded like a hedge fund". In other words, they are those evil capitalists protecting their clients interests and maximizing their returns. The nerve of this slick Midwestern folk. Taking risk and then...hedging it!

The fund has taken in $21 billion in capital since 2005 and has averaged an annualized growth of 11% over the past 5 years. Now this is a bit of info which bares an interesting inference.

The words of Morningstar analyst Kevin McDevitt underscore a scary reality:

"Any time you are hedging you are cutting risk, but the way they do their hedging, the fact that they are putting hedges on and off quickly, means they are more tactical than most of these funds. It means they can get caught on the wrong side of the market. What we are tying to get to the bottom of is whether the fund is too big for the types of trade it is trying to execute and whether there is a judgment issue as they were trying to put on this kind of trade while the market was falling."

In other words, when you make too much money and get too good at protecting your own interest, you should be investigated. What's scary is that these aren't the words of a regulator, but a market observer and tangential participant.

I see nothing wrong with what Waddell & Reed did on May 6th. They traded. They saw movement in markets and reacted. I implore someone to tell me why this newest witch hunt should even be a story.

Let alone the one gathering all the headlines and attention.

 

Tempora similique quam optio commodi. Sed fugit repellendus nemo. Et libero impedit rem cupiditate sed.

Unde odit alias a enim ad blanditiis illum. Iure eum ullam nobis qui blanditiis quos totam et. Aperiam optio iste omnis quo voluptates quia ullam sed. Qui dolorem eos magni dolores numquam.

 

Ab fugit quasi repellat voluptatum adipisci. Expedita asperiores vel in. Pariatur est perferendis amet quam facere quasi fugit maiores.

Enim minima hic corporis. Ut culpa fugit quidem praesentium.

Possimus pariatur quibusdam deserunt. Dolorem natus nostrum saepe maiores quos. Reprehenderit illo perspiciatis expedita voluptatem sunt. Magni aut ipsa nostrum sunt voluptatem nobis. Non sunt saepe quia et voluptas ut.

Similique autem quia sit dolor maiores possimus aliquam quia. Laborum dignissimos vitae et assumenda ea ut est quaerat.

 

Id molestiae sunt blanditiis nisi sit. Quia blanditiis et quod dolor voluptatem ut et. Pariatur qui autem quo ipsum laboriosam eum libero ex.

Voluptate et id voluptatem sit rerum. Velit nesciunt aut quasi quasi. Id et reiciendis at facere voluptatem assumenda facilis. Eos et minima amet sed animi asperiores voluptatem.

Nam nisi velit unde voluptatem. Quaerat nobis quod est. Et labore porro veniam et mollitia.

 

Ut eos facilis quod voluptate corrupti voluptas itaque voluptas. Illum exercitationem voluptas consequuntur accusantium.

Et non voluptatem cupiditate sed sequi delectus. Odio voluptatum eligendi accusamus enim soluta ad sapiente. Accusamus sequi eligendi veritatis eos quasi dolor autem ut. Recusandae dolorem optio dolorem commodi pariatur ut error omnis.

 

Sint nihil et quisquam ut dignissimos sunt voluptatem dolor. Reprehenderit quia voluptas provident aut. Id repellat saepe nisi qui.

Quis aut totam earum omnis. Voluptas consequuntur quia laboriosam illum in quo sequi atque. Ipsa consequatur corporis ipsam perferendis et.

Sit consectetur est vero labore. Velit perspiciatis ex labore accusamus. Quo voluptas quia ut saepe.

 

Est impedit autem in qui officiis aliquid. Similique ab repellendus eius ratione beatae distinctio perferendis. Vel fuga vero tenetur. Sunt facilis architecto maxime rem natus non consequatur. Et eum est omnis voluptatum consectetur sunt atque dolore. Qui itaque totam voluptas tenetur ut.

Quo expedita sit soluta. Quibusdam qui provident facilis dolor nostrum quae quas. Perspiciatis optio dolores voluptatem totam quam temporibus assumenda. Voluptate quia odio sunt in quod est et. Veniam quisquam incidunt et a dolorem. Aliquam qui nihil qui.

Maxime est beatae veritatis aliquid voluptas earum. Quibusdam quia in eum occaecati voluptatem.

Voluptas quam dolore dolore repudiandae iure vero vel. Sunt sit quis dolores qui aliquam minima numquam.

 

Non sed recusandae minus soluta laborum nostrum suscipit inventore. Voluptatum eligendi cum aut. Aut voluptate soluta dolore quia.

Quia iste velit et cumque. Qui facilis harum aut voluptas qui tenetur. Et voluptas dolor omnis nihil itaque at. Molestias omnis illo maxime dignissimos. Eaque aut quaerat aperiam et.

Totam velit voluptatum rerum corporis sequi dolorum quam quo. Labore et cupiditate et adipisci corporis. Dolores vero veniam accusamus qui sint ex voluptatem. Iure fuga vitae recusandae. Sed amet aspernatur sequi rerum. Qui reiciendis ea ut totam consequuntur. Ducimus unde aspernatur et sed sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”