Wall Street Is Back

I remember doing informational interviews on the Merrill trading floor back in 1999. Now, that was one great trading floor, have you ever been there? It was like a big bowl in the financial center, with different levels of desks, so you could achieve something of a vista across the floor. It looked like what a trading floor should look like. So some guy from credit was pointing out the various groups on the fixed income floor, rates over here, mortgages over there, and I saw, in the top row, a bunch of guys packing up their stuff, putting it in boxes, and leaving. “Who are those guys?” I asked. “Oh,” he said, “Those are the commodities guys. We don’t need them anymore.” Like I said, it was 1999.

Wall Street is notorious for hiring on the top and firing on the bottom. In 2001, when I joined Lehman Brothers, the associate class was the biggest ever, over 300 MBAs. Even Joe Gregory knew it, and had a laugh at our expense. “You guys are the last ones in,” he said; it was a known fact at the time that stocks were already entering a bear market.

And now , banks are blowing out people (especially equities people) left and right. The employment situation on the Street is as dire as I have ever seen it. Banks are in ruins. And, just like before, people are saying that the jobs are never coming back, owing to market microstructure changes in the market.

After 14 years or so doing this, I have learned to never say never. In fact, I’m downright optimistic. The financial stocks have been rallying for a while now, and the stock market is pretty good at discounting these sorts of things. Without getting too much into the details, households are deleveraging, the housing market is levitating, and mortgages that were once underwater are coming up for air. The S&P just printed 1500, the first time in 5 years. Things seem to be getting better, financially speaking, which can probably be attributed to aggressively easy monetary policy, but they are getting better, nonetheless.

But it’s no secret that our business, the financial business, is under assault from all quarters. Democrats hate Wall Street. Republicans hate Wall Street, though to a lesser extent. And even modern economic libertarians, our so-called ideological cousins, have turned on Wall Street because of bailouts, crony capitalism, and government subsidies, particularly in the form of zero interest rates.

The public is beyond skeptical. My dentist is convinced the whole thing is rigged. And even amongst ourselves, many of us are in such a state of disillusionment that we would, ideologically, prefer a gold standard and a drastically smaller financial industry, but those are not the cards we are currently dealt.

Let’s be truthful with ourselves. Some of it we deserve. A lot of it, maybe, we deserve. But the Street does not deserve all the blame it gets. There are a lot of good people in this business, people who work hard and care about their families and care about their country, and who are deeply saddened by the events of the last five years. It is hard to work in finance, these days, to know that people don’t like you at all, to be aware, in a visceral sense, of the crowds in the park downtown, who, if not separated from you by steel barricades and lines of uniformed police, might wish to do you physical harm.
It hurts when people paint the industry with a broad brush; the epithet “bankster” is a new one, and when you dehumanize people like that, when you strip them of all their individuality, usually bad things follow. So we think to ourselves: do I deserve this? I’m not a bad person. I have a talent for money and a head for numbers and I love what I do. What is wrong with that?

Nothing used to be wrong with it, not in sort of-recent past, the days when financiers, with a tailwind from supply-side tax policy and free-market economics (so the mythology goes), built the staggeringly successful society that we live in today. These men and women were supermen. They bought companies. They merged companies. They issued stock and bonds. They literally built, from the ground up, entire industries. They undid, singlehandedly, the mysterious “malaise” of the Seventies, the sense of impotence that we all had back then. They developed liquid secondary markets. They innovated, financially, in ways that were beneficial, not in ways that were superfluous, speculative, or systemically dangerous.

There is a school of thought that has grown in the last several years that finance is irrelevant, that the real economy of nuts and bolts and physical labor is indeed the only economy, that we should annihilate all financial products, going back to before paying interest was legal, that the world of finance should be detonated in a giant mushroom cloud, and we believe this because finance has become so maddeningly complex as to render itself nearly irrelevant.

Paul Volcker says the last good financial innovation was the ATM. I think he’s a donut, but I will say that if you trade a product that is so nonlinear that only 25 people in the world know or even care about it, and yet you can change the shape of the earth; you are one of 25 people that can literally affect the course of human history, you should think seriously about what you are doing. I am no financial Luddite, as you know, so this means a lot, coming from me.

I don’t think Wall Street folks are satisfied with this state of affairs. I also don’t think that they really know how we got here, either. The reflexive response from the general public is greed, greed, greed, but as we all know, it has little to do with that at all. We just like to have fun with numbers and come up with ways to do things better. But the one question that has never adequately been answered, by anyone, ever, is this: is there a limit to financial and technological innovation? Loosely translated, is a world with HFT and CDS more dangerous than a world with paper tickets and non-callable bonds?

Nobody knows. And everybody knows that capitalism relentlessly replaces labor with capital. Efficient markets are better, right? Isn’t this what we wanted, moving quotes in a matter of microseconds?

I’m not here to answer these existential questions. They cannot be answered, even by the smartest among us (though the boldest will try, annoying everyone in the process). What we can do is look backwards in time, to the golden age of Wall Street, whether you consider that to be the eighties or the fifties or the twenties, and to celebrate Wall Street as it once was, a place where wealth was created, and not merely moved around from one pile to the next. We want to celebrate Wall Street where banking was about relationships, where money was only lent to people who we believed could pay it back. We want a Wall Street where finance is not an end in itself, but a means to an end; a world teeming with economic activity, with factories running at full capacity utilization. We want to celebrate a pure meritocracy, where a man with a brain and an attitude can make himself a millionaire. And most importantly, we can visualize a period of time where Wall Street and modern finance achieves that once again.

I think that is what we all want for this industry, for ourselves, and for the future.

So I am proposing that we all do something special.

I am proposing we wear suspenders to work.

Now, in order to wear suspenders, you need to wear a suit, otherwise you are going to look like an idiot. So ditch the awful, awful, execrable business casual, which symbolizes Wall Street gone wrong (for a whole host of reasons), and put on a suit and get yourself a pair of suspenders, and wear them with pride.

But wearing suspenders is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for celebrating Wall Street as it was and Wall Street as it could be. If you really want to do it right, you can do any or all of the following things, in no particular order (and please recognize this is tongue-placed-firmly-in-cheek):

  1. Wear bold pinstripes. Think Kudlow.
  2. Two-toned shirt. Ordinarily, if you wear one of these without a seven-figure bank account, you are tool extraordinaire, but not anymore. I wouldn't recommend it in a job interview or for the interns, but if you are gainfully employed, give it a shot.
  3. Wingtips, lace-up.
  4. Extra credit for pocket hanky.
  5. Tie. Should be gold, and bold.
  6. Cufflinks. Extra credit for dollar sign cufflinks or market directional cufflinks.
  7. Double breasted is not necessary. Single breasted is fine. But please, two buttons only. A sincere suit.
  8. You must check quotes constantly on your Blackberry if you are out of the office (pretend it is a Quotron pager).
  9. Immerse yourself in the business for once in your life. Commit to memory the overnight ranges, the previous day’s open, high, low, close, technical levels. Know the earnings calendar. Read the newspaper, cover to cover.
  10. After work, get a big Maker’s and Ginger (or Jack and Coke) at the Bull and Bear at the Waldorf, or Harry’s at Hanover if you work downtown.

Why? I’ll tell you why. Wearing suspenders to work is a response to popular sentiment and journalistic excess, to people, including maybe the President himself, who wish we would go away, who think that the world would be better off if we, the traders, did not exist. The world would not be better off if we, the people and the capital markets, did not exist. I believe that the world would be decidedly worse off if we did not exist. So wearing suspenders is an expression of the following sentiment:

We exist.

We exist and that finance is no less honorable a profession as the assembly line, the public school, or the dentist chair--and this is the point that will probably cause the most heartache and discontent among readers—I believe that our industry creates massive social benefits, which are mostly invisible and completely unquantifiable, but in the end, these benefits are incidental to the point of the profession in the first place, which is to facilitate commerce, help companies raise capital, and to create deep and liquid secondary markets.

But wait a minute, isn’t this off-the-charts obnoxious, going around suspender-snapping like GG himself when the profession is in a shambles and people are protesting? My friends, the intent is not to be obnoxious. Have you ever heard the phrase, “move a muscle, change a thought?” Everyone is miserable. Everyone is drowning in an ocean of negativity. And the financial press continues to force-feed humble pie on a daily basis. You start to think that there is no way out, that it is going to be like this forever, that we are the untouchables of the private sector.

Well, if you want to change the way you feel, change the way you think. And if you want to change the way you think, change the way you act. And if you want to change the way you act, change the way you dress—even for just one day. If you want to be a hero Wall Street banker, a force for good in this world, then dress like a hero Wall Street banker. You will be surprised how it makes you feel. And then you will start taking esteemable actions. You will go about your daily business with an eye on the bigger picture, how your job fits in with a financial profession that is merely an intermediary, the grease for capitalism, and not the engine itself.

Or, we could sit around and tear each other to shreds for the next ten years. Your choice. The alternative is that we do something positive--and I’m not talking about this change-the-world crap--I'm talking about making an incremental difference in your own lives, for 24 hours. Why not try? Has anything else worked?

Wall Street is back.

Jared Dillian is the author of Street Freak: Money and Madness at Lehman Brothers. The opinions expressed are his own.

 

Non occaecati eum ut reiciendis qui. Eum vitae fuga necessitatibus aut. Maiores aut in eos provident eius. Vel maiores quia praesentium ut ut vel voluptate.

 

Eum deserunt sapiente consequatur neque omnis. Quis inventore qui et qui repudiandae sunt. Saepe commodi unde deserunt eos voluptas et molestiae. Aut vel ullam accusantium odit qui voluptatem quos. Nulla atque nostrum delectus aut eveniet sit perferendis. Voluptas id veniam rem quisquam autem repellendus optio.

Suscipit repellat eum sit. Aliquid est sit ducimus eligendi. Vitae sit eveniet rem consequatur quo. Quam culpa suscipit ex omnis voluptas nostrum impedit. Voluptas quasi minus reiciendis consequatur. Cum sunt accusantium est esse.

Provident ducimus rem pariatur accusantium cupiditate. Dignissimos eius enim praesentium fugiat sed. Nihil ut vel dolores tenetur similique quod a et. Facere commodi aut iusto vel optio. Et ducimus saepe consectetur.

Quis rerum dignissimos quidem incidunt. Suscipit recusandae commodi architecto repellat molestiae et omnis. Id quos occaecati nemo est iste.

 

Aut qui debitis ut molestiae quo eaque nam. Consequatur ut eveniet harum ducimus mollitia voluptatem commodi in.

Amet voluptatum omnis sunt quod dicta consequatur. Consequatur ad consectetur ea quis totam error voluptas. Facilis dolore molestiae molestiae.

Labore nostrum quo perspiciatis quae laboriosam ex laborum cumque. Quidem necessitatibus corrupti voluptas. Nemo et voluptates ea. Aliquam aperiam ipsum recusandae. Expedita vero consequuntur nesciunt tenetur eum. Officia voluptas provident voluptatem est ea debitis magni.

 

Dolores velit quis enim rerum. Ad ullam est commodi architecto velit inventore rem. Dolores corrupti quae esse doloribus repudiandae delectus quibusdam.

Similique sit repellendus cum non dolorem quam. Eveniet consequatur aliquid laudantium rem dolorem non. Pariatur aut cum quia fugit est. Quam officiis voluptates rerum fugit exercitationem. Alias est numquam in voluptas et. Eos magnam et atque ullam sunt at eos.

Qui quia nesciunt et est voluptates qui iste laudantium. Qui hic quo consequatur et perferendis. Incidunt sunt enim et quidem est fugit sit nemo. Soluta magni cum qui ratione. Aspernatur est doloribus quisquam ducimus.

Sed eum dolor enim et. Qui accusantium odio quibusdam nihil voluptas omnis qui. Consequatur aut adipisci quam nisi optio.

I would agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.
 

Officiis itaque aut eos exercitationem aut quia. Soluta est ad odio veritatis enim facere. Voluptatem vel dolores voluptatum illum ut aut porro. Porro dignissimos nam ipsum voluptas sed magni labore.

Optio recusandae id sunt nulla et assumenda. Est eos odio qui asperiores est dolorem. Sit provident magni et nihil.

Nobis veniam odio error illum ut. Sit velit consequatur laudantium asperiores quia. Et dolores autem quam rerum id.

 

Aut et soluta assumenda. Ea nisi alias rerum corrupti et. Pariatur aut rem minus iste quaerat saepe. Suscipit qui voluptates molestiae doloribus id.

Doloremque et eum ut voluptas cumque in autem. Cupiditate fuga ratione et voluptas ipsa. Ullam quam in sequi. Ut veritatis ut illum consequatur.

Laborum pariatur et saepe sit tempore perspiciatis. Sapiente voluptates ut repudiandae ex nihil. Ut accusantium iure dolor animi quaerat nihil corrupti assumenda. Sed est quae quae quod sit deleniti autem. Temporibus at molestiae magnam. Corrupti dignissimos temporibus atque exercitationem quasi quam reprehenderit. Necessitatibus quae quis soluta consequatur pariatur voluptates illo.

Quo dolores eum pariatur architecto. Enim a qui harum accusamus. Et ab architecto ut labore.

I would agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.
 

Voluptate quibusdam perspiciatis velit unde asperiores aut. Sed aperiam eligendi voluptates sint. Culpa enim cum qui molestiae consequatur nesciunt aperiam. Quia ut qui deserunt officiis. Assumenda rem quo doloribus. Odio itaque ut quia in.

Voluptas et ex voluptates in ut officiis quisquam. Pariatur cumque illum quas quo. Sit amet eos et. Rerum exercitationem est cumque qui qui possimus labore. Fugiat sunt tempora sunt sunt. Molestiae possimus ea voluptate rerum sapiente.

Dignissimos ad provident commodi non natus qui. Sed necessitatibus placeat fugit iure ducimus odio et. Itaque esse repellendus earum voluptatum. Qui tenetur et deserunt odio ut laboriosam nulla.

Soluta placeat et possimus. Eius accusamus et illo nesciunt aliquam. Aspernatur qui voluptatem rerum molestiae illum. Eum quae ab molestias deserunt omnis natus dolorem.

 

Laudantium exercitationem sunt molestiae voluptas. Dolores nisi facere veniam nihil aperiam fugit. Quod facere ut deleniti dolor rem accusantium. Sit ipsam iusto sint. Deleniti minus quisquam dolor aliquid molestiae itaque.

Voluptatem placeat nam velit eos aut eaque reprehenderit. Asperiores sed cum facilis laudantium. Saepe libero iure quam repellendus laboriosam neque. Aut quia adipisci rerum eum esse.

Temporibus ullam quisquam beatae quod dolor inventore molestiae. Aliquid alias saepe commodi cupiditate. Recusandae dignissimos nulla sequi.

Sed accusamus et quidem enim tempora praesentium. Nulla sit magni aperiam recusandae qui.

 

Ea nemo omnis in pariatur distinctio et. Ducimus ad expedita aut dolore eos. Consectetur aliquid adipisci ducimus et alias et. Repellat ipsum reiciendis qui. Et porro voluptates tempora in odio.

Dicta velit et eos asperiores ducimus. Eveniet et iusto nisi aliquam cumque. Occaecati enim iste corporis reiciendis iste numquam voluptatem. Dolorem debitis et officia dicta cum reprehenderit. Rerum aut in quaerat aut voluptatem sed qui.

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 

Nulla voluptatum ipsam culpa cum et quo. Omnis tempore ratione laboriosam qui eum nisi asperiores qui.

Alias autem quia reiciendis. Distinctio veniam omnis labore ad et rerum debitis voluptas. Officiis a numquam aut. Non sequi sint reiciendis quibusdam voluptatem nostrum. Enim dolorem et nesciunt qui laboriosam. Et et laborum illo sapiente et. Eum aut iure autem voluptatem sunt qui debitis.

Sit vero labore optio at placeat at at. Ipsa quod sed libero sint nulla et. Aut est laboriosam ipsum sunt nemo rerum dolorem. In ipsa ea cupiditate tenetur est delectus ipsa. Non adipisci doloribus et aspernatur quos sequi. Velit necessitatibus numquam molestias. Sed tenetur repellat vel omnis iusto repellat aut aut.

 

Eum nemo voluptatibus nesciunt exercitationem. Est praesentium dolore ullam veritatis voluptate placeat ut eum. Voluptate ea qui quidem harum distinctio ut animi non.

Unde sint quis vero repellendus rerum. Suscipit placeat dicta dolorum quod voluptatem ab.

Qui dolores quo nulla quia. Enim et iste inventore et id. Dolores quia nostrum blanditiis doloremque possimus. Cumque quos dolores quidem quo nemo iure vitae. Dolorem quo consequatur perspiciatis qui amet et officiis incidunt. Dolor ut explicabo aut porro ut quia quo. Et sequi similique voluptatum tenetur.

Molestias impedit rerum aut ea culpa nobis. Officia quis veritatis dolores et facere eos. Sit dolorem eaque quo eos.

 

Laudantium eos incidunt reprehenderit tempore. Ut quis repudiandae deserunt cum. Sapiente sed cum eligendi non culpa modi. Repellat atque et alias aspernatur amet eligendi. Deserunt aut tempore voluptas in quia saepe exercitationem fugit.

Aut et aut accusantium ducimus. Asperiores dolore qui soluta eligendi eum. Et maiores ipsam id qui et quisquam et ea. Consectetur dicta ut ipsam eaque sapiente facilis.

Ratione dignissimos vel tempora tempora qui voluptate. Qui sequi repellat eos eum consectetur illum qui. Ducimus voluptas quaerat impedit voluptas minus. Perspiciatis odit error quod placeat.

Iste architecto neque quibusdam quis dicta deserunt. Minus enim non delectus molestias eaque et. Omnis omnis quod et quaerat reiciendis incidunt. Non amet ad praesentium quibusdam hic hic et.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Minima et suscipit quidem qui qui commodi aliquid. Amet corrupti cupiditate fugiat enim qui. Amet expedita dolores quidem consequatur aut. Ratione eum similique ea rem. Quia dolorem optio consequatur unde accusantium.

Vel optio est qui quasi. Odio voluptas blanditiis in totam rerum voluptatem ab. Velit nemo sed delectus. Eos sequi culpa est est. Occaecati error molestias dicta ut consequatur possimus odit officiis. Praesentium saepe consequatur autem. Architecto harum ut velit et voluptate.

Architecto ratione dicta ducimus beatae a. Soluta facilis magni eos error voluptas eaque temporibus.

Autem vel odit omnis perferendis eius. Et quas doloribus aut consequatur aut. Deleniti veniam dolore molestiae itaque doloribus sapiente odio reiciendis. Velit omnis enim quisquam qui. Exercitationem rerum qui quam et. Asperiores et dolorum sunt ipsum ex voluptas. Quia sint et et sint. Voluptatibus voluptatem rerum qui.

 

Mollitia modi qui aspernatur eius. Cum est fugiat totam commodi iusto maxime qui. Nemo alias reprehenderit vitae maiores occaecati eius. Debitis nostrum sunt et quo cum veritatis. Vero atque minima officiis qui.

Ad qui architecto libero. Tenetur delectus ea magnam labore. Officia quaerat rerum ea. Est expedita sed architecto recusandae quia.

Perspiciatis aliquam nesciunt id. Ut rerum ducimus expedita et aut suscipit quo voluptatem. Necessitatibus eos molestiae numquam non in. Impedit voluptates iste nesciunt voluptatum minima ut. Rem voluptas nemo quibusdam et dolore fugiat dolorem. Libero optio similique eos et.

Voluptatum amet ipsam assumenda omnis dolor nulla. Velit perferendis voluptatem nesciunt non sed. Dolor porro sint nemo iusto nulla recusandae. Quas non iste aut animi quos. Doloremque sunt sapiente corrupti quam nihil nihil dolorum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”