When did you first “get” finance? I know this is kind of a silly question, but it struck me as a good discussion topic the other day as I was plowing through an LBO model. We learn an absurd amount in school, and the majority of it ends up floating away because it has little or no relevance to our careers. But for the things that do stick, when did you find that you were actually able to apply that knowledge, draw conclusions from it, and add value?
Follow my reasoning here – take, for example, intro level finance and accounting. You learn about debits and credits, FIFO & LIFO, the time value of money, and how to (almost) always trust the wisdom of NPV analysis when choosing among projects. All interesting things, but when you’re in school and these concepts have little or no bearing on your life beyond that which you need to know for the exams, they remain just that: concepts in abstraction. Even in all those interviews you prepped for, where you could walk anyone through a DCF, track a $10 change in depreciation through the three financial statements, and explain how leverage amplifies returns, did you really get what all that means? For me, the “a-ha!” moment involved capital expenditures.
Sure everyone knows that they’re listed on the cash flow statement under investing activities, you have “capitalized” this and “capitalized” that, and you learn to dutifully subtract the CapEx as a key step to arriving at free cash flow. While performing diligence on a company back in my banking role, I noticed that the company had an extremely high amount of “capitalized” software development costs – we’re talking a CF/CapEx ratio of like .05x. This struck me as odd, but not completely off-putting as the company’s EBITDA was high, and the industry loves EV/EBITDA multiples. Regardless, I dug a little deeper, teasing out maintenance versus expansion CapEx, and trying to get a better handle on the company’s internal financial controls. I learned that the company was arbitrarily capitalizing its software development costs and amortizing them over management’s “estimation of the useful life of the software.” In other words, the company was breakeven at best, and management’s aggressive accounting painted a questionable picture of the company’s financial health. I presented my findings later that week, and my analysis was the basis for our subsequent conversations with management. I added value!
Arriving at even this tiny conclusion on my own without any guidance from an Associate, VP, etc. made me feel like a champ. Call me a nerd, but it felt great to have used some intellectual horsepower that day. WSO, when did the “a-ha!” moment happen for you?
Great Insight! Thanks
ur saying the CapEx should've been som sort of OpEx? pretty cool insight - one of my Aha! moments was truly understanding differences between net income vs. operating cash flow vs. EBITDA / EBIT vs. FCF vs. ex-cash earnings etc. and which one you should focus on for valuation.
Still waiting after over ten years.
I'm curious exactly how you went about this:
Also, were you pretty adept in reading 10Ks at that point in your career?What sector was that?
Sector: Software
@Ron Paul - The company was private and we had access to their audited financials. And it definitely took me a while to figure it out. Like I was trying to say in the OP, I conceptually understood CapEx through my classwork, etc., but it didn't really click until this particular scenario.
Ie: upon receiving the financials, the line of reasoning went something like: ok, this company has nice EBITDA margins...wow its CapEx is high in and of itself, wait - if I subtract it from EBIAT, this company is barely generating cash...and so on and so forth. I had to do a bunch of follow up research on capitalizing software dev costs vs expensing them, the rationale behind doing either, comparing this company to public companies and see if they expense/capitalize their dev costs, etc. My only exposure to this sort of thing before related to capitalized or operating leases.
All this research eventually led to the question of "ok, why would the company want to do this? Oh because it can smooth out earnings (given that you're amortizing the software dev costs over 5+ years), and also in this particular case, the company was shifting from an on-premise to a SaaS delivery model. I can see WHY they would want to do that, but the fact remains that they're barely generating cash." And at this point, I circled back with the deal team. Interesting stuff.
Don't all software companies have cap ex around that >.05x cap ex/CFO ratio?
Yup - you're correct. Although I was saying the opposite - CFO/CapEx was super low, not CapEx/CFO.
When I read Rich Dad Poor Dad
My Ah Ha moment was when I read through your article and found that capitalizing development costs complied with GAAP when the software is used for its own use, and can also be capitalized when the software's feasibility has been reasonably established...
No one ever said it wasn't GAAP. However getting a deeper view of a companies financials in the footnotes can give you a better understanding of how things are really going with a company. If they make changes that are very favorable, even if it is GAAP compliant, it may be worth looking into.
when i discovered zerohedge
This pretty much.
After I watched Boiler Room, Wall Street, and American Psycho, I had a feeling I could rake in deals left and right as a GS TMT MD.
The day I no longer needed a mouse.
Teaching my boss what R squared was and how to use it
What was the point of this?
@HarvardOrBust - It turned into a bit of a joke thread, but the original intention was to have a discussion around when people felt they truly "got" finance. Ie: you are able to apply what you've learned without prompt or guidance and make actionable recommendations and/or add value - if that makes sense.
Excellent thread.
Ullam quia rerum saepe illum. Ipsum sit qui similique at a voluptatibus aspernatur. Et quia ullam corporis tempore culpa est natus.
Repellendus et veritatis voluptas odio. Dolorum et adipisci vel. Quia ex reprehenderit consequatur facere eos numquam. Repudiandae aspernatur qui temporibus velit. Voluptates qui quia ut nihil quibusdam est animi.
Voluptatibus quo quaerat ad praesentium veritatis illo aut et. Impedit incidunt aut labore quibusdam. Nam culpa ut mollitia numquam deleniti. Veritatis dolore pariatur rerum reiciendis modi eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Cupiditate et minus sunt facere doloribus. Ea aliquam reprehenderit reiciendis cupiditate. Velit et quia ea et eligendi. At qui nihil et cupiditate consequatur.
Aperiam dolorem quia sed omnis veritatis. Totam enim omnis laudantium error enim ducimus itaque. Non perferendis consequatur unde quibusdam.
Impedit voluptate vero nesciunt et ipsa officiis qui. Assumenda autem deserunt repudiandae ea labore. Vero possimus molestias aperiam nisi dolorem dolorem inventore eum.