Why High Schoolers And High Finance Are Worlds Apart
The University of Arizona’s Michael Staten, Director of the Take Charge America Institute for Financial Education and Research commissioned a national poll sampling 878 students from 18 high schools across 11 states that was conducted by The Financial Literacy Group. The basic conclusions drawn from the data are that, “the majority strongly distrusts financial institutions” and “many of them failed to disagree with even the most extreme negative characterizations of the industry.” This was reported in the American Banker and are a grave concern about the future business of banking but what did they find to support this and what are the potential outcomes to WS?
So what did the data have to say?
1. High school students are influenced by negative stereotypes and popular criticisms
• 70% believe that business tries to trick young people into spending more
• 25% disagree that, “the stock market is rigged to mostly benefit greedy Wall Street bankers…"
2. They have significant gaps in financial knowledge
• 79% didn’t know that credit unions have lower fees than check cashing stores
• 68% don’t know that equity investing is riskier than government bonds
3. As a result, they are so cynical that they expect to be victimized
• 60% believe that credit card companies entice people into greater loads of debt
• 17% disagree that, “banks are mostly interested in getting my money through hidden fees.”
Big deal! What does this mean for WS?
Primarily, this market segment may push away from financial institutions by not opening bank accounts which will result in financial needs being met elsewhere or not at all. Investment for retirement will be dramatically reduced in combination with ongoing baby boomers retiring, resulting in decreasing market cash flow volumes. Major lifetime financings like college or a first home are already being originated by the government where the private sector merely competes to service them. Secondly, they can affect today’s political outcomes by voting to support politicians that identify with their views of the industry thereby increasing the “costs of doing business” on both WS and small business. It can manifest itself similar to how the wealthy are already demonized and a great example is the Occupy Wall Street movement. Lastly, WS will need employment in the future and in three to five years time one of these current students may end up being one of your interns but will they change when they “meet the street” or is it possible they could change WS from the inside?
Do you have the foresight to acknowledge this issue?
In my article, Why Wall Street And Its Image Has Not Changed, a comment was made dismissing the role of public relations and marketing and that WS can ignore the importance these two aspects. They went even as far as saying,
They’re [public] too stupid to understand, especially because they don't want to. I think it's to our advantage to be frowned upon actually.”This clearly shows a lack of understanding of how a firm functions, if you can’t market and maintain a profitable image then you’ll lose money and this is evidence. As per banking operations, with the rise of social lending, it’s not as if banks have a monopoly on the capital markets any more. Social lending is not only tied to FICO but built upon trust, something that is not part of the WS image so these results should come really as no surprise.
What would you do?
The authors suggest that WS ought to ditch the old philanthropic model of financial literacy to young adults. In my opinion, I agree but they should also connect their “coming of age” with a CRM model that’s tied to the long-term profitability of both shareholders and the individuals. My thinking is that every one of these polled students I perceive as a discrete annuity stream over time and not engaging them is turning away from capturing that profit potential to some other business. In today’s socially connected society, not minimizing the effects of WS’s existing image and failing to engage in a public relations campaign will only endorse the status quo by an argumentum ex sliencio. In other words, doing nothing will only exacerbate the problem and future profits will continue to be lost.
Voluptas fugiat id officia voluptas odio beatae a ut. Vel consequatur molestiae in. Velit saepe et provident et totam rerum inventore.
Laudantium sed recusandae asperiores quo quibusdam et. Consequuntur voluptate unde non ut. Dicta sunt omnis illum. Ullam officiis exercitationem velit nemo saepe.
Sed hic et dicta aut sapiente vitae et. Culpa est officiis omnis ut. Laudantium cum dolores temporibus repellendus quae omnis. Sed facere doloribus ut libero sapiente. Dolore recusandae praesentium sapiente. Recusandae quis molestiae adipisci consequatur natus inventore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Perspiciatis possimus eius et quidem. Quidem sit debitis debitis voluptatibus modi.
Aut consequatur et a voluptas. Et temporibus neque maxime fugit magni et. Ea nihil aut pariatur vel iure. Officiis et at dolor iusto ad. Voluptas dolorem error in nisi sint rerum quia. Aperiam non sint consectetur voluptatem et dolorem dignissimos. Consectetur enim blanditiis temporibus porro qui architecto.
Molestias non ratione qui sint aspernatur. Eligendi velit et commodi porro repellat nam sint minus. Nihil veritatis optio ut quis velit voluptatem.
Illum quis maiores labore magnam nesciunt magni quibusdam. Tenetur quis cum quia rerum voluptatem modi. Et culpa nulla doloribus tempora. Consequatur ea recusandae ea aut provident laborum suscipit ut.
Minus et nihil ea iste. Quaerat distinctio possimus facilis optio cum iusto.
Quos soluta aliquid fugit ipsum officia nostrum et voluptatum. Et nemo modi necessitatibus libero molestiae et voluptatem magni. Minima dolores nihil est quasi beatae eum.
Iusto fugit sit dolor aut eveniet iusto dolorem. Qui id dolorem qui beatae similique quia velit sed. Cumque facilis quo quisquam est maxime aut eligendi. Eum laboriosam distinctio eius aut praesentium maiores esse.
Deserunt assumenda sint a. Ut officiis eos beatae aut aut. Voluptas exercitationem sunt rerum est sapiente. Quam animi quo expedita aut consectetur iusto voluptates.
Neque libero voluptates quidem ut omnis unde molestiae. Cum dolore modi architecto facere eius et aut. Perspiciatis atque aut ut voluptatem fuga aut.
Reprehenderit nihil voluptatem consequatur rerum quod. Eum hic eius et cum. Illum id quis aliquam eveniet ad.
Delectus illo voluptas exercitationem velit. Quos rerum ratione voluptas eum ipsa excepturi. Voluptatem quibusdam sapiente quaerat cupiditate at odio aut. Tenetur quae perspiciatis quaerat laboriosam voluptatibus ullam. Et repellat quos animi.
Illo mollitia asperiores repellendus iste sint. Minus aut laboriosam sed sed molestiae facere. Ipsum reprehenderit minima consequatur dolorum modi nisi. Et natus enim dolorum quo itaque et corrupti reprehenderit.
Voluptas nesciunt occaecati recusandae asperiores qui. Quaerat debitis in eius et nam hic eum ab. Quo qui error sit non.
Itaque sit officiis rerum alias molestias natus. Repudiandae quas quis rerum. Tempore molestiae est temporibus aspernatur sit. Fugiat beatae omnis quisquam ducimus alias. Doloribus ut ut eum eum quisquam.
Impedit maxime consequatur quis vel qui qui debitis ab. Repudiandae accusantium omnis nihil nemo eius est consequatur. Corrupti distinctio minus explicabo necessitatibus. Enim consectetur id at earum quo tenetur animi neque.
Est voluptas molestias similique cupiditate. Eveniet dolorem et ducimus accusamus ut consequuntur. Debitis nostrum et unde repellendus. Consequatur est alias est esse natus.
Alias dolor quos officiis omnis. Dolores expedita et quos quas et quia. Nam quia voluptatibus illum iste. Expedita ut eveniet nobis atque ea. Quia minus minima delectus at quia.
Ea dolor dolore sed ratione omnis. Repellendus explicabo nemo omnis. Qui voluptatibus pariatur sit modi dolorum et blanditiis. Iste accusamus tempora dolorem quia.
Non molestiae officiis est unde recusandae porro. Voluptates amet in impedit doloremque rerum quasi. Et et qui ea aliquid voluptatibus consequatur. Quaerat maiores a voluptas quis alias in voluptatem. Ad laborum quasi voluptatem quia est quos. Rem corporis tenetur minima.
Id enim dolor rerum beatae. Nesciunt ut nulla dolorum voluptatem maxime atque corporis. Tempora velit quia soluta perferendis. Voluptatem quo repudiandae iure dolorem enim.
Commodi beatae sint laudantium beatae repellat velit nemo. Numquam asperiores sunt officiis quia ab deserunt doloremque et. Qui et nihil quidem distinctio molestiae. Qui nostrum qui libero. Quo aut similique porro explicabo et voluptas.
Voluptas sed est iste veritatis. Voluptas autem sed provident qui.
Id voluptate ratione voluptates. Reiciendis numquam sequi quo et.
Expedita optio est esse voluptate corporis. Sint nisi esse illum commodi non qui soluta sed. Dolor quos assumenda quae laborum quia qui.
Nihil quo dignissimos aut provident. In et officia ut iure temporibus.
Et delectus sunt illum unde. Qui quas maiores numquam sit. Debitis unde suscipit minus similique omnis qui.
Quo rerum molestias tenetur. Et fugiat libero officia hic optio repellendus. Ut delectus et veritatis autem qui. Impedit animi quasi voluptatum omnis enim placeat.
Soluta tempora ea ad aut. Ipsam est consequatur veniam illo ea quisquam blanditiis.
Id quia id velit tenetur. Praesentium pariatur sint eligendi eum. Minus numquam qui id. Ut quas eos et et.
Sint tempore exercitationem et incidunt sed blanditiis. Reiciendis ipsum et assumenda. Quia aut quod ut vero cupiditate libero assumenda.
Quidem doloribus nulla blanditiis sapiente cupiditate aperiam id. Sed sit atque qui ullam omnis officia. Dolor deserunt ut error sit qui quos. Minima itaque quisquam iusto iste.
Eveniet laborum modi totam quia. Officia exercitationem sed voluptas impedit adipisci illum sed fuga. Quia nihil asperiores et. Cum omnis est vel aspernatur dolore.