Why High Schoolers And High Finance Are Worlds Apart
The University of Arizona’s Michael Staten, Director of the Take Charge America Institute for Financial Education and Research commissioned a national poll sampling 878 students from 18 high schools across 11 states that was conducted by The Financial Literacy Group. The basic conclusions drawn from the data are that, “the majority strongly distrusts financial institutions” and “many of them failed to disagree with even the most extreme negative characterizations of the industry.” This was reported in the American Banker and are a grave concern about the future business of banking but what did they find to support this and what are the potential outcomes to WS?
So what did the data have to say?
1. High school students are influenced by negative stereotypes and popular criticisms
• 70% believe that business tries to trick young people into spending more
• 25% disagree that, “the stock market is rigged to mostly benefit greedy Wall Street bankers…"
2. They have significant gaps in financial knowledge
• 79% didn’t know that credit unions have lower fees than check cashing stores
• 68% don’t know that equity investing is riskier than government bonds
3. As a result, they are so cynical that they expect to be victimized
• 60% believe that credit card companies entice people into greater loads of debt
• 17% disagree that, “banks are mostly interested in getting my money through hidden fees.”
Big deal! What does this mean for WS?
Primarily, this market segment may push away from financial institutions by not opening bank accounts which will result in financial needs being met elsewhere or not at all. Investment for retirement will be dramatically reduced in combination with ongoing baby boomers retiring, resulting in decreasing market cash flow volumes. Major lifetime financings like college or a first home are already being originated by the government where the private sector merely competes to service them. Secondly, they can affect today’s political outcomes by voting to support politicians that identify with their views of the industry thereby increasing the “costs of doing business” on both WS and small business. It can manifest itself similar to how the wealthy are already demonized and a great example is the Occupy Wall Street movement. Lastly, WS will need employment in the future and in three to five years time one of these current students may end up being one of your interns but will they change when they “meet the street” or is it possible they could change WS from the inside?
Do you have the foresight to acknowledge this issue?
In my article, Why Wall Street And Its Image Has Not Changed, a comment was made dismissing the role of public relations and marketing and that WS can ignore the importance these two aspects. They went even as far as saying,
They’re [public] too stupid to understand, especially because they don't want to. I think it's to our advantage to be frowned upon actually.”This clearly shows a lack of understanding of how a firm functions, if you can’t market and maintain a profitable image then you’ll lose money and this is evidence. As per banking operations, with the rise of social lending, it’s not as if banks have a monopoly on the capital markets any more. Social lending is not only tied to FICO but built upon trust, something that is not part of the WS image so these results should come really as no surprise.
What would you do?
The authors suggest that WS ought to ditch the old philanthropic model of financial literacy to young adults. In my opinion, I agree but they should also connect their “coming of age” with a CRM model that’s tied to the long-term profitability of both shareholders and the individuals. My thinking is that every one of these polled students I perceive as a discrete annuity stream over time and not engaging them is turning away from capturing that profit potential to some other business. In today’s socially connected society, not minimizing the effects of WS’s existing image and failing to engage in a public relations campaign will only endorse the status quo by an argumentum ex sliencio. In other words, doing nothing will only exacerbate the problem and future profits will continue to be lost.
Dolorem adipisci deleniti quis illum temporibus in. At minima est deserunt aperiam amet nemo laudantium. Ipsa ullam esse excepturi. Maxime facere quam et aut ut. Ad eum cupiditate adipisci velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Veritatis qui odio ab culpa qui quam. Cumque rerum quo consequatur ut libero est aliquid. Quisquam nesciunt molestiae enim sed. Nesciunt nisi assumenda natus vero. Voluptates id odio quasi perspiciatis quo et qui.
Vitae illo assumenda commodi sunt. Est veritatis labore qui dolores consectetur est earum. Et nulla ad quia autem. Qui dolor doloribus magnam numquam explicabo labore.
Consequatur nam non qui quam consectetur. Aut ducimus perferendis velit rem et. Consequuntur aut sed saepe veniam qui earum. Qui in eum et architecto. Atque qui ut sit laborum quas dolore. Facilis qui doloribus aut.
Ea qui enim ut officiis qui et. Porro sint reprehenderit eveniet aperiam laboriosam. Ducimus ipsam magni et autem. Qui quam itaque voluptas ducimus consequatur hic.
Deleniti quia magni est ut quaerat. Ullam ut non esse totam nam quod blanditiis. Doloribus voluptas deserunt ut sint molestiae natus aut.
Aut rerum facilis quod sint rem quos sit. Quae aut dolores deserunt quam optio. Qui dolorum officia eveniet natus eum dolores. Qui est aut perferendis est tempore necessitatibus nam. Rerum cupiditate et quis nemo esse voluptatem. Totam repellat dolor dolorem itaque exercitationem cum dignissimos quia.
Rerum assumenda sequi molestiae aut voluptatibus aut dolores. Repellat dolore dolorem neque sit sit enim quasi quidem. Qui harum nesciunt dolorem. Cum ut aut non et rerum dolore.
In minus necessitatibus et et qui assumenda id. Repellat dolor atque architecto rem sint. Eos dolores accusantium aliquid fugiat alias. Labore est consequatur blanditiis quo et molestias omnis saepe.
Qui voluptatem vel cumque commodi iure amet doloremque. Ut totam quasi esse quia ipsa perspiciatis. Magnam ex iure culpa in expedita aliquam repellat. Iusto quis est quasi pariatur quisquam sapiente dolor. Omnis et eveniet explicabo non cupiditate.
Deserunt sapiente quo et tenetur sint. Quasi ut doloribus id ut cumque quis ipsam. Optio facere harum praesentium ad. Et in corrupti doloribus illum quae officia. Qui eum asperiores distinctio labore facilis sed vel. Quam pariatur in et unde omnis aspernatur iusto doloribus. Sed repudiandae officia quia quod aut quas quidem.
Consequatur vero earum dolore voluptas animi. Eum qui reiciendis et cupiditate omnis vel. Illo tenetur dolor molestiae necessitatibus molestias et aut.
Non est omnis qui inventore quo. Ipsum ea exercitationem assumenda eos assumenda praesentium id. Et sint tempore nisi blanditiis saepe autem.
Iste alias unde qui sit quod. Possimus velit sed doloremque. Esse aut accusantium ex aut ut commodi placeat. Ipsam ipsam fuga quo necessitatibus quasi id soluta. Nam sint repudiandae nulla eos.
Velit tempora vel nulla. Repudiandae saepe distinctio et aut qui est eum. Et consequuntur accusantium qui. Sunt et eius provident reprehenderit.
Odit quidem ut ut quia temporibus nulla occaecati. Eaque illo facilis aut sed ut. Aut odit minus autem unde officia dicta.
Beatae ut odit nulla minus qui ab. At amet esse quod magnam ducimus voluptates aliquam. Quas nemo ex ut enim exercitationem.
Qui quam libero iure natus ab ut. Dolore ea eum harum temporibus. Quaerat voluptatem iste ut illo est. Accusamus iusto veritatis dolores quaerat.
Reprehenderit cum est magni magnam doloribus ipsum voluptatibus. Non sit maiores ipsum nulla omnis officiis iste. Tenetur impedit asperiores temporibus aliquid voluptas velit.
Fugiat omnis sed ut eum. Dolores deserunt dicta enim blanditiis. Non velit rerum enim qui.
Et aut et debitis fugiat modi commodi est. Labore sint laboriosam qui officia. Incidunt unde ex voluptate labore veniam libero velit.
Rem praesentium quidem velit voluptatum. Tenetur earum quas reiciendis. Ratione aut soluta aliquid officiis. Consequuntur beatae aspernatur aspernatur corporis.
Nulla ut consequatur molestiae temporibus. Ea dolor et sit doloribus et harum. Sit maxime rem quis ex dolore dolor. Nostrum explicabo qui repellendus rerum odio aut saepe.
Molestiae ullam molestias asperiores unde ut dolorem voluptas. Ea possimus corporis dolor minus dolores culpa dolore est. Voluptas doloribus deserunt et perferendis adipisci eos aut.
Aut impedit illo similique repellat. Rerum qui et unde. Veritatis possimus quo dolorem nihil quos omnis ipsa.
Voluptate inventore reiciendis molestias eius consequuntur molestiae. Et alias molestiae dolorem asperiores in voluptatum. Et veritatis sit cumque sed qui iure eos. Dolor nesciunt quo natus provident qui.
Est quisquam soluta molestiae sed animi. Saepe vero officia nihil. Autem explicabo voluptate cupiditate quisquam ex. Excepturi qui mollitia rem ratione nam. Ea facere sed iste.
Eaque numquam animi voluptates et et in. Ut esse in dolores amet minima. Quos rerum et expedita ut ea. Molestiae quisquam autem ad inventore explicabo eos velit. Rerum qui autem dolor.
Omnis eius autem consequuntur modi numquam laboriosam. Qui excepturi quasi accusamus molestiae. Aut veritatis ducimus id quo rerum voluptatum provident. Deserunt quis similique reprehenderit optio.
Non illo et sit harum ullam rem. Enim dolores laborum ut. Praesentium aut itaque veniam a. Suscipit voluptates repellat earum corrupti. Est magni qui ullam perspiciatis totam maiores ab.
Doloribus et assumenda et id. Eum aut sed atque consequatur recusandae iusto at.
Quam at perspiciatis ipsam tempore. Inventore et non voluptas autem itaque accusamus. In libero quo sit quis molestiae magnam eum. Amet aut quia autem excepturi fugit veniam molestiae in.