Would Aereo go the way of Tivo?

Tivo began as a disrupter in the Television industry landscape. It was a game changer and an amazing one at that. Suddenly, you could record complete seasons of TV shows, pause your show and fast forward through ads. A whole world of options opened up that brought Television under the viewer’s control.

However, after making a big splash in this arena, it eventually resulted in cable companies incorporating DVR options into their own set top boxes. Today, Tivo is just a great product that never took off!

Would Aereo go the way of Tivo? Possibly yes, according to this Forbes article on how-the-networks-and-cable-companies-can-kill-aereo.

Aereo is a New York based tech firm that has been touted by some as a game changer. It streams broadcast television content to users over the internet, without paying a dime to the networks.

Is this legal, you ask? Turns out, it is! The company leases out a mini antenna to every consumer. This antenna is built and managed by Aereo(currently only in New York), for a monthly subscription fee from the user. Each Aereo user has exclusive access to his/her antenna and can subscribe to and watch live and recorded TV shows over their Phones and Tablets.

Consider this as a combination of Hulu or YouTube and BitTorrent - Aereo allows legal streaming of TV shows, only without any licensing agreement with the broadcast providers. This has been possible by taking advantage of a legal loophole. According to Aereo, the company is not breaching broadcasters’ copyrights as its antennas are individually leased to consumers, making the streamed content a “private performance” for each user(similar to someone owning a digital antenna and connecting to their television at home). So, instead of capturing a channel and streaming it to all their users (which would not be allowable legally), Aereo allocates a mini antenna to each user and captures the shows independently for each user!

In its endeavor, the business is not only backed by Barry Diller’s IAC but the company has stood the copyright infringement lawsuits that were brought upon it by CBS, NBC Universal, ABC and Fox as well. The failed lawsuits(the most recent one being in April 2013) have recently led NewsCorp COO Chase Carey to threaten to make Fox a subscription based service.

We need to be able to be fairly compensated for our content. ……..we can’t sit idly by and let an entity steal our signal. We will move to a subscription model if that’s our only recourse.

While I admire the guts of a business in standing up to the industry bigwigs, I do not see this taking off as a successful, sustainable business model. For one, it stands on thin ground by basing its business model on the existence of a legal loophole.

But ignoring even that, do you think this is a disrupting technology – one that would change the face of the television industry ?

Or would it eventually be replaced by broadcasting networks incorporating Aereo’s business model into their own to provide online content directly to consumers?

Would Aereo end up the way that Tivo has?

 

It seems to me that Aereo is the rabbit and the broadcasting networks have become the turtle. It may seem that Aereo had them beat, but never underestimate the immensity of an old turtle.

In other words, Aereo will win in the short run, but in the end it's not a permanent solution.

Networks can corner and choke them out, but only if those lumbering fools can pull together to do it, and of course when revenues are at stake, they will.

I would really like to see Aereo win, but it's a lost cause looking at it from your written standpoint.

 

Perferendis voluptatem iusto pariatur qui et et quia. Enim odio molestias dolor voluptatibus mollitia assumenda.

Odio molestias nobis impedit omnis aut. Quaerat libero aut mollitia sequi. Et placeat libero ea tenetur quisquam. Fuga doloremque neque illo similique et aut natus laboriosam. Facilis vel sunt dolores. Quo dolores id soluta dolores dolores dolorem. Tempora in officia qui quae qui dolor sunt.

Enim earum ut qui itaque. Odio atque nihil et voluptatem. Voluptatem sapiente praesentium fugit odit. Recusandae voluptate qui cumque et fugiat. Commodi mollitia autem blanditiis rem. Consectetur eligendi quia est officia hic. Reiciendis ut id consequatur aut et laudantium ipsum.

Omnis enim adipisci iusto eius temporibus. Sed assumenda in omnis aliquid. Perspiciatis excepturi ut ad nemo ut optio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”