Would You Sell An Equity Stake in Yourself?
I want to share a topic off the Internet that discusses an alternative way to pay for higher education.
Last week, a blogger (on another site) referred to the idea of equity financing for college students. So basically, instead of obtaining student loans and potentially getting into debt to pay off tuition, students would sell equity stakes in their future earnings and pay a percentage of their annual income to their investors.
This idea is derived from the perception that humans can be viewed as ‘start – up’ companies: both need capital for growth and are uncertain about future earnings. Start – ups usually have the choice between equity financing and debt financing and many choose to finance through equity due to the large potential of earnings. The logic then goes, since start – ups have the choice between debt and equity, why can’t humans also receive outside equity financing their future?
The suggestion for what is termed “Venture Capital investments in humans” or “Human Venture Capital” is actually not new. Nobel Prize economist Milton Friedman first conceived the idea in 1945. His reasoning was that education is a risky investment and loans are not best suited for such investments since interest rates must be extremely high to offset the risk. However, private financing of education would be a viable option if investors “participated in a student’s financial success the same way that they participated in a company’s success if they had acquired an equity stake in it.”
There have been several references to this proposal of human venture capital throughout the years in media outlets such as newspapers, journals, and magazines as a possible route for financing college. In the 1970’s, Yale actually tested out a variation of the concept when it initiated a program called Tuition Postponement Option, which offered income – contingent loans. In this program, the university had a vested interest in their students, which allowed them to take out loans in return for paying a percentage of their future annual income as a cohort to the university. This program failed miserably and was later ended due to the cohort setup so repayment for a graduated class became a huge burden. However, many proponents of equity financing believe that using private investors as the source of capital would work.
Whether private equity financing for humans could work is very uncertain. There are many arguments against this practice though. First of all, there may be an ethical issue: for a student to sell an equity stake in themselves, they would have to enter into a contract with the investor to set up a payment plan for x number of years. Would that make them an indentured servant?
Then, there is a legal issue: What happens in the event that a student defaults on their promise to pay part of their income?
Finally, as Josh Barro of Bloomberg points out, the effectiveness of venture capital financing could be hindered by adverse selection. That is, while most students strive to graduate college and make lots of money, they are the only ones who know about their future plans and could mislead investors about their earnings desire.
While I personally think this idea of equity financing shows promise, the issues raised are definitely major concerns. What do you guys think about the idea?
Interesting post
I think that is an interesting concept, but not for the purpose of student loans. I would sell an equity percentage stake in myself (something in the region of 10%) to a career mentor, someone with at least 20 years of experience in the fields I want to enter, for their free advice, contacts, introductions etc. for life. Obviously this makes it much harder to commercialise, you are not just getting cash for future potential cash, but on the upside it means that the "investor" has far more engagement with you and is likely to take more of an interest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unincorporated_Man
So nobody has heard of Bowie Bonds?
This is a horrible idea, primarily because you're talking about a 17- or 18-year-old literally signing away his or her future. I don't think most teenagers are mentally capable or experienced enough to understand what the ramifications are long-term. It's one thing for a 20-something to sign away future earnings for the career coaching benefit that Asatar suggested, but it's an entirely different thing for a teenager to enter into a long-term repayment arrangement. This is also why I think it's foolish to take out significant undergraduate student loans for anything other than engineering or accounting degrees from state universities or degrees from the Ivy Leagues with the intention of going into high finance or law school.
I've heard that Buffett asks college students if they would take $100,000 in exchange for giving him 10% of their income for life. He basically calls anyone who would take the $100k an idiot.
Well, the government gets 30% and I get $0 under the current system.
Interesting way to diversify
As mentioned in the bottom of the article, adverse selection could very well cause the student-equity market to collapse. Think about it: Every student obviously knows him(/her)self better than any investor possibly could (i.e. asymmetric information). So those students that either know or have a very good feel that they will become successful financially later in life will take on student loans to leave the upside for themselves, whereas the equity market will be flooded with history majors and future stay-at-home moms.
It's pretty much Akerlof's lemon case, but with students instead of cars.
Agree. It's too bad too cause it's a pretty cool idea
Buy 90% equity in african teens for $200k, ship them to HSW, make money. Arb.
Exactly what I thought when I read this.
You gonna get someone to work for 10 cents on the dollar?
This sounds crazy and potentially dangerous.
An idea I had a while back, was devising a way to buy equity ownership in your friends. So e.g. I own 70% of my future earnings, and trade 30% for 30% total ownership in a mix of different driven friends of mine. Would immunise layoff and market risk a bit, and could work out great if it was someone you trusted.
Problem is how to implement it.
Dolorum minima cum autem aliquid omnis illum labore quaerat. Est officia fugit explicabo eveniet provident omnis. Nam iure atque tempora et voluptatibus voluptas earum sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...