Trading Vs. I-Banking
I think it’s important for us to be clear about the pros and cons of each of the two career paths and I’d like to consolidate some of the opinions that have been floating around about this topic on this thread.
Here’s one impression I’ve gotten from speaking with people on both sides of the isle: Banking is for the typical ivy-league pencil-pushing over-achieving workaholic, while trading requires a somewhat less quantifiable “it factor” that typically manifests itself in the form of uber-competitiveness and the ability to withstand tremendous pressure.
So in an effort to stimulate a healthy flow of information, I’d like to ask anyone with any input on this topic to contribute their $.02. Some of the questions I’d personally like to see answered here are:
- What do recruiters look for when hiring bankers vs. traders? What skills, talents, likes & dislikes are a good fit for what job?
- Who typically makes more money between the two over the long run?
- Which career path typically offers better work/life balance, satisfaction and flexibility?
- What are some of the top locations for each of the two?
- Who gets more tush?
Also, when answering, please make an effort to distinguish between the various kinds of trading, i.e. prop, S&T, etc. and different banking departments.
Why Trading?
Most of our users highlighted that they liked the competitive nature of trading as well as the meritocracy of trading firms.
All I've ever wanted to do save for professional sports was to have been a trader.
I work at one of the top tier BBs (albeit in the BO, I'll get to the trading floor eventually or leave the street all together), and salary wise, most market makers (not even the hot shots that are prop guys) seem to have more fun with their job than bankers do, but again my views have shades of selection bias, as I'm only going off of a handful of bankers I know vs. many more traders.
There's risk, but rewards in intelligent decisions (most of the time) is something that draws me and most into it that go into the career. I also believe it was bondarb or revsly or one of the traders on here that said the job may be 24/7 but since you're actively using your brain, (as opposed to cranking out pitchbooks-sorry for the bias), its more enjoyable.
Let me add a couple minor but possibly important points, although these are secondhand info that i've heard/heard:
- a trader is not a trader. Even within BB S&T there are vast differences in terms of income/exit opps/hours/ lifestyle for a trader. Just because you're a trader doesn't mean you can some day move to a hedge fund and cash in on the bonanza. Some traders can never move to a hedge fund and will never make seven figures, simply because of where they started. It depends on what kind of trading, what your product is, etc.
- Of course you can make a lot, but the median is probably pretty similar to the ibanking track. Shit, remember a couple years ago when Blackstone (or kkr?) was offering $1m over the course of 2 years for PRE-MBA associates. So you're 24, here's a million dollars. I doubt that happens much in trading.
- For those who are arguing that a computer can never really replace a human trader, I have seen threads recently where guys on here were concerned about automated trading taking over a particular product or market.
Moral of the story, don't do it for the money. If you're on the fence about whether you should pursue a job in S&T, you're already not cut out for it.
I am more on the electronic side of trading, and I can't really comment on numbers for either side- trading is a lot more driven by personal performance, and if you can establish a track record of making real money for a firm, you can get someone to offer you a percentage of your earnings. Traders on the other hand tend to be from more diverse backgrounds, or really I should say have far more diverse personalities.
Why Investment Banking?
I had experience interning in both trading and banking and choose to pursue banking full time for a few reasons:
- I like the skills that I am developing in banking vs. trading which offers a more limited skill set
- I like the exit opps from banking vs trading at a BB (PE, HF, Corp Dev)
- While S&T is fast paced, your tasks a junior person are very predictable (markets may change by your day doesn’t)
- I like financial modeling and analysis
While this may be enjoyable to some, personally I would find that to be a reason not to do trading, and hence a huge factor for deciding between banking vs trading. Trading is much more of a niche career path than banking. Yes it is more meritocratic, but you will only be doing one thing your entire career. I can't imagine being on my deathbed 50 years from now and realizing that my entire career accomplishments can be written in a single line preceded by a $ sign. Yes, banking has more grunt work for a longer period of time, but you do learn more tangible skills that can be applied to other fields. For me, job satisfaction is worth much more than the amount of money I could make.
Compensation Comparison on Wall Street
Our users shared that at the junior level, compensation is fairly similar – however, in trading as you get more experienced your pay is tied to performance so if you are good you can take home large sums.
A trader with real game can knock out in a year what an MB in IBD can over a career. The typical banker, however, will clock hundreds of thousands a year after a while, no matter what. No such guarantees in trading.
Who typically makes more money between the two over the long run?: The median salary (and the correct answer) is probably the same for both professions in the long run. Too many people on this board think that 20mm+ traders are found everywhere. In the short run, bankers make more.
In terms of compensation, a good trader makes a LOT more than a good banker for the simple reason that we are getting a % of our PnL and banker pay is pretty much a fixed bureaucratic ladder system. Being a trader is a TRUE meritocracy and you eat what you kill and if you can't kill, well then you go become a banker or flow trader. In my firm, we get paid 40% of our PnL once you make a trader once you make it out of the trading assistant program.
Since banking is more bureaucratic, it's probably easier for people to keep their jobs as a banker b/c as a trader, nobody cares if you did great work analyzing and building out spreadsheets if you can't translate that into PnL.
Also, bankers may make more at the junior trader/analyst level right out of school but that's because:
- We are letting you see our proprietary strategies in exchange for you just doing our PnL and bitch work so there's no reason for us to pay you a salary but since we know you have to pay rent, we do
- The amount you will learn just by being around successful prop traders should be enough compensation; you are learning to make money, not make stupid powerpoint presentations and kiss ass although we do appreciate it very much. After a while, you can go anywhere and make that money (usually after a junior trader program is done) so firms have to start paying you what you are worth or you will go somewhere else.
Check out our Investment Banking Industry Report to learn more about compensation in the industry.
What Do Recruiters Look for When Hiring for S&T or IBD?
User @BillyRay05", an asset management research analyst, shared advice about what recruiters are looking for:
What do recruiters look for when hiring bankers vs. traders? What skills, talents, likes & dislikes are a good fit for what job?: Recruiters want bankers generally more polished (eloquent) and their traders with raw mental ability (that's why engineers do well). The trading/athlete phenomenon is due to the pressures on the job- pressures that athletes are familiar with. Nevertheless, both groups like pedigree and intelligence, and my desk is filled with Ivy Leaguer's
What Is the Work Life Balance on Wall Street?
Generally speaking, the traders work less hours in the office but will often be thinking of their portfolio outside of work. Bankers on the other hand are working almost 24/7 in the office.
Which career path typically offers better work/life balance, satisfaction and flexibility?: This depends on your personality. One forces you to work 100 hours a week on BS models while making your life pretty miserable. The other forces you to be at work at 6:30, forces you to work 70 hours a week and stress out the remainder of your free time, making your life pretty difficult. One isn't easier than the other. They are just really different.
I work as a prop trader on the International desk of a prop trading firm in NYC and I went to a target school so a lot of my friends are bankers...only a select few became traders. Personally, I only work 40-45 hours a week usually from 8 am to 4:30 pm and sometimes I'll stay late if I want to look into new ideas and build some things out. However, when I was a trading assistant/junior trader, I did work more hours just because I wanted to be the first one in the office and the last one out (as a rule of thumb, you should always be there when your superiors are there to support them and more importantly, learn) Also, I do find myself watching CNBC and reading bank research when i get home just for my own personal knowledge and I like to hear other people's opinions. When I am working though, I am sprinting the whole time unlike bankers which are pretty much running a marathon.
Each has their own misery, hours in trading are generally better, though as markets are becoming more 24x7, that is not necessarily true in all cases.
Exit Opportunities for Trading and Investment Banking
The exit opportunities are different for both professions. IB analysts typically go onto PE, a hedge fund, or business school. Working in corporate development or start-ups are also options. Traders basically need to stay in trading either for a bank or for a hedge fund.
Banking: Lot of Hours, Compensation probably a little better than trading starting off but not "real" difference (10-20k differences don’t really matter when your starting off), Work involves doing a lot of models all day and night long and preparing to sell banks services to clients, exit opportunities - hedge fund (surprisingly alot of hedge funds other than specifically quant oriented probably will be your suitor) / PE / Anything else you really want to do. 2or3yrs and most likely you will have to get your MBA (costly)Trading: Hours are less but early mornings (ie. 6-7am). Very intense trading during the day.
Compensation v. similar to banking although depends on performance of your group. Exit opportunities? continue trading, go to a hedge fund, business school (not necessary). Opportunities are obviously a lot less but if you like trading, i would argue you want to keep doing the same thing.
Read More About Trading and Banking on WSO
- Investment Banking Analyst: A True Day In The Life
- Hedge Fund Careers: Getting A Hedge Fund Job Out Of Undergrad And Beyond
- Investment Banking Interview Questions - A Comprehensive Guide
Preparing for Investment Banking Interviews?
The WSO investment banking interview course is designed by countless professionals with real world experience, tailored to people aspiring to break into the industry. This guide will help you learn how to answer these questions and many, many more.
Wondering the same thing, I'm torn between persuing OTC derivatives trading or IB.
Your boy must have been talking about sales. Most of the top prop shops (especially in the Chi) have no interest in non-quant background people. As a matter of fact, many won't even talk to the soft-skilled business major crowd. You'll see some target kids get a shop based on rep and connections, but the general preference is towards heavily technical people and there are more PhDs in the game every day. The general train of thought as of late is "give me a comp sci, stat, engineering automaton" (though I'm seeing chemistry and physics frogs pop up on the radar) and I will teach him what he needs to know. The entrepreneurial types are too likely to bolt for their own shop once you teach them a system. For the record, by faaaaaar the most handy skill for trading today...pro-gram-ming.
A trader with real game can knock out in a year what an MB in IBD can over a career. The typical banker, however, will clock hundreds of thousands a year after a while, no matter what. No such guarantees in trading.
The tush goes Alpha every time. Like everything else, it's a matter of what your risk profile is, the situation then adapts to you. Keep'em swinging.
how about s&t vs prop trading?
If banker presses B instead of M, in worse case scenario he'll get raped by MD at most.
Trader on the other hand will make the entire market go bananas for 40 minutes.
This.
-Who typically makes more money between the two over the long run? Traders can be done by 35 with a few billion, yet to meet one banker in same boat -Which career path typically offers better work/life balance, satisfaction and flexibility? depends on your goals.. -What are some of the top locations for each of the two? NYC & London for both -Who gets more tush? does not matter on job, if you got game you got game
Let me add a couple minor but possibly important points, although these are secondhand info that i've heard/heard:
a trader is not a trader. Even within BB S&T there are vast differences in terms of income/exit opps/hours/ lifestyle for a trader. Just because you're a trader doesn't mean you can some day move to a hedge fund and cash in on the bonanza. Some traders can never move to a hedge fund and will never make seven figures, simply because of where they started. It depends on what kind of trading, what your product is, etc.
Of course you can make a lot, but the median is probably pretty similar to the ibanking track. Shit, remember a couple years ago when Blackstone (or kkr?) was offering $1m over the course of 2 years for PRE-MBA associates. So you're 24, here's a million dollars. I doubt that happens much in trading.
for those who are arguing that a computer can never really replace a human trader, I have seen threads recently where guys on here were concerned about automated trading taking over a particular product or market.
Moral of the story, don't do it for the money. If you're on the fence about whether you should pursue a job in S&T, you're already not cut out for it.
agree to moral and yes 24 year old traders can be offered $$$$
look, the whole athletes make good traders thing is way overblown. yes, traders like to hire other guys that have athletics background, but it is not nearly a big deal as it has been made out to be. To be a good trader, you need to be smart, most of the products today are very complicated and have a lot of different risks and other characteristics. Even for simpler products like government bonds, there is still a lot going on and you will see very smart people on all those desks. when i was interning at a BB on the agency desk, all the younger traders that had been around for a couple years were all engineering majors at school. so even on the sell side brains > brawn. but being a former athlete definitely does help, its just not a make a break type thing that some people make it out to be
I am more on the electronic side of trading, and I can't really comment on numbers for either side- trading is a lot more driven by personal performance, and if you can establish a track record of making real money for a firm, you can get someone to offer you a percentage of your earnings.
I can tell you this though- bankers tend to be more of the wannabe old money crowd, and are the types of guys that will look at your shoes and watch when they meet you before they look you in the eye, which I personally detest. Traders on the other hand tend to be from more diverse backgrounds, or really I should say have far more diverse personalities.
Each has their own misery, hours in trading are generally better, though as markets are becoming more 24x7, that is not necessarily true in all cases.
Someone should really start a database where we can all input our numbers. Sometimes I wonder if that 26 year old sales chick is raking it in or not.
Jr. Trader @ a bank with a lot of banker bud’s. So my answers will not apply to you Chicago Prop guys (although I did intern at a reputable prop shop)
-What do recruiters look for when hiring bankers vs. traders? What skills, talents, likes & dislikes are a good fit for what job?
Recruiters want bankers generally more polished (eloquent) and their traders with raw mental ability (that’s why engineers do well). The trading/athlete phenomenon is due to the pressures on the job- pressures that athletes are familiar with. Nevertheless, both groups like pedigree and intelligence, and my desk is filled with Ivy Leaguer’s
-Who typically makes more money between the two over the long run?
Interesting question. The median salary (and the correct answer) is probably the same for both professions in the long run. Too many people on this board think that 20mm+ traders are found everywhere. In the short run, bankers make more.
-Which career path typically offers better work/life balance, satisfaction and flexibility?
This depends on your personality. One forces you to work 100 hours a week on BS models while making your life pretty miserable. The other forces you to be at work at 6:30, forces you to work 70 hours a week and stress out the remainder of your free time, making your life pretty difficult. One isn’t easier than the other. They are just really different.
-What are some of the top locations for each of the two?
I say NY, but to each his own.
-Who gets more tush?
The operation guy, the artist, and the barista probably get more azz than most of the monkey’s on this board. The fact that you used the word ‘tush’ suggests that you seldom lay the pipe yourself…
I work as a prop trader on the International desk of a prop trading firm in NYC and I went to a target school so a lot of my friends are bankers...only a select few became traders. Personally I only work 40-45 hours a week usually from 8 am to 4:30 pm and sometimes I'll stay late if I want to look into new ideas and build some things out. However, when I was a trading assistant/junior trader, I did work more hours just because I wanted to be the first one in the office and the last one out (as a rule of thumb, you should always be there when your superiors are there to support them and more importantly, learn) Also, I do find myself watching CNBC and reading bank research when i get home just for my own personal knowledge and I like to hear other people's opinions. When I am working though, I am sprinting the whole time unlike bankers which are pretty much running a marathon.
In terms of compensation, a good trader makes a LOT more than a good banker for the simple reason that we are getting a % of our PnL and banker pay is pretty much a fixed bureaucratic ladder system. Being a trader is a TRUE meritocracy and you eat what you kill and if you can't kill, well then you go become a banker or flow trader. In my firm, we get paid 40% of our PnL once you make a trader once you make it out of the trading assistant program. We also do hire a few flow traders or prop traders from the banks if we feel they have an "edge" that we currently do not have. Every trader on my desk is up at least 1.5 million this year on my desk or more and we of course have 1 guy who is up 7mm+ this year (not me =( ) However, the options desk is down this year because the volatility of volatility has been so high but that isn't their fault but yes their compensation will take a hit this year although I don't think any of them will be let go.
Since banking is more bureaucratic, it's probably easier for people to keep their jobs as a banker b/c as a trader, nobody cares if you did great work analyzing and building out spreadsheets if you can't translate that into PnL. I enjoy picking off traders who don't have a clue what they are doing and I'm sure other traders do too so you see why bad and mediocre traders must be let go (so you can pick them off when you go to another shop) Also, bankers may make more at the junior trader/analyst level right out of school but that's because 1), we are letting you see our proprietary strategies in exchange for you just doing our PnL and bitch work so there's no reason for us to pay you a salary but since we know you have to pay rent, we do 2) the amount you will learn just by being around successful prop traders should be enough compensation; you are learning to make money, not make stupid powerpoint presentations and kiss ass although we do appreciate it very much. After a while, you can go anywhere and make that money (usually after a junior trader program is done) so firms have to start paying you what you are worth or you will go somewhere else.
Just my 2 cents but I'm biased but I will tell you that I'm mid 20s and I make more than all my banking friends by a good margin and I have no ladder to climb - the market and margin calls is who I report to.
Hi, i was just wondering how you got the job you have.
shit, i should call it "azz" from now on
ahh this is some great stuff goldmansack... this is a major crossroads I am at right now
One of my friends who worked as a Trader at a BB lost 1.5 million. After that, he can never find a second job relating to trading. :(.
I d like to add my bit to this. I ve worked in trading and now I am in IB.
Meritocracy in trading
I am not sure on this one. You can quantify the result of your work by a $#, but I believe there is misconception on this among new joiners. In banks, with prop stuff not being the core of the business, the majority of the trading does not require the special talent or quant edge that people in prop shops are looking for. The whole game in both Trading and IB is incredibly political at big banks. I have seen people with very questionable p&l figures move through the ranks in a trading environment by striking the right chords with the bosses.
High-flyer pay
We constantly hear stories of some 25 year old traders raking in 7 digit sums while I have never heard of such a thing in IB.
I think this is misleading because people going in to the industry get the impression that once they get a trading job, do well, they will be in the news. This may well be the case and good luck to anyone who does pull it off, but the reality is a combination of landing in the right team, having a boss you are a natural fit with, and your desk doing well.
There is great dispersion in terms of performance among trading desks within both prop shops and banks. Consequently the culture from one desk to another can be completely incompatible. Within the same bank you may easily find rates to be the natural home, while finding yourself absolutely incompatible with people in equities.
I believe trading success is a function of finding the exact right product to trade. A great FX trader can be a mediocre performer in equities and vice versa.
Within the trading floor the quality of jobs varies enormously, most roles are not the glamorous trading roles people look for, while in IB there is substantially less dispersion, and the skills you gain are very transferable between teams.
Having said all that, if you one has a good understanding of where exactly within trading he wants to fit in, and has the interest in the business, trading is definitely more rewarding.
IB vs. Trading: Day in life, salary, bonus, etc. (Originally Posted: 07/21/2006)
Hi, I will be a junior at a target school next year. I'm looking forward to interviewing and i am hoping to land a summer analyst position for summer '07. I am quite familiar w/ the banking sector due to these wonderful message boards and from reading books. I either want to do banking (M&A) or trading (Credit Derivatives or Equity Derivatives). Can somebody with INSIDE KNOWLEDGE explain day-in-life and compensation characteristics for the two? Thanks
bump
The differences are very easy, its choosing what you want exactly thats a little bit tougher.
Banking: Lot of Hours, Compensation probably a little better than trading starting off but not "real" difference (10-20k differences dont really matter when your starting off), Work involves doing alot of models all day and night long and preparing to sell banks services to clients, exit opportunites - hedge fund (surprisingly alot of hedge funds other than specifically quant oriented probably will be your suitor) / PE / Anything else you really want to do. 2or3yrs and most likely you will have to get your MBA (costly)
Trading: Hours are less but early mornings (ie. 6-7am). Very intense trading durring the day. Forget about Equity Derivatives... its a joke - i would suggest sticking with Credit or any other fixed income instrument. Compensation v. similar to banking although depends on performance of your group. exit opportunities? continue trading, go to a hedge fund, business school (not necessary). Opportunities are obviously alot less but if you like trading, i would argue you want to keep doing the same thign.
anyways, hope this helps. for an internship, you can really do anything you would like- not really a problem as you can experiment since you dont really know. If anything, i would do a banking internship to make sure thats what you want to do.
For a 1st year analyst, what is the annual base pay & sign-on bonus(at a bulge-bracket firm) like for both trading and i-banking.
I have recently been offered a FX trading position by a bulge bracket and would like to find out if my offer package is reasonable.
Many thanks guys.
thanks for the reply by the way, why is equity derivatives a joke?
Base pay for iBanking and trading at most firms are the same ($60K this year). The bonuses will differ by $5-20K depending on performance of trading and banking that year. Banking usually gets the higher cut.
i cant speak to what the life of a trader is like but i can tell you what the m&a group is like:
the hours generally tend to be much worse than industry groups but the benefit is that you are able to work across industries because at a lot of banks you are a product group. however you will have some of the best exit opps coming out.
hope this helps and good luck with interviews!!
anyone else notice dan bush admits he's a junior in this post? looks like we've got 600 posts of bs out of him.
busted...no wonder he posts that much
Dude you're a fucking idiot. Have you ever heard of lending posts. Dumb ass.
What are the advancement opps in both? Is it much faster to make MD in S&T versus IBD? Also, how does the compensation compare at senior levels?
What are the advancement opps in both? Is it much faster to make MD in S&T versus IBD? Also, how does the compensation compare at senior levels?
so someone asked you to post something for them when you've been here for 1 week? Pretty unlikely.
Especially when anonymoust posting was enabled then.
if anonymous posting was up why would i post under my name? hmmm.
because you joined 1 week prior to that thread, and anonymous posting was indeed enabled, since someone posted that same day.
Come clean
by Dan Bush on Fri, 2006-07-21 18:36 by Anonymous Monkey on Fri, 2006-07-21 22:19
he's busted. hopefully he'll go the way of zala and roguebanker so people can get advice from real bankers.
Dan the Man...say it isn't so? I've got to be in NYC the week after next to market a private placement to some hedge funds...wanted to try to hook up for drinks somewhere in Midtown. FUCK MAN!
Hey guyz I'm a analyst at.. oh wait I'm still in school.
HAHAHAHA.....wait, wait.....HAHAHAH
If you are real PM me your bank email. I will email you from my banks email. Then I will report the results on this board. Of course I will keep you email confidential, as you will mine.
Take buysideanalyst up on his offer. Prove 'em all wrong Dan the Man! Fuck! lol.
get some real life friends, monopolisf
And honestly, Dan wrote a lot of bullshit but at least some of it was entertaining.
The regular Q&A gets boring sometimes IMO...but then again...I'm not on here looking for a gig or to receive constructive help...I'm just here for occasional entertainment. ;)
what a let down, dan
so is ECM still middle office dan?
That post sounds too friendly to be Dan.
Trading at an HF vs. iBank vs. trading firm (Originally Posted: 08/30/2006)
Which of these is the best for someone without experience (regarding compensation and learning to trade)?
a lot of people will respond that a bulge-bracket firm will give you the best place to start a career in trading; i think one reason would be that a lot of them do a rotational thing for 1st years.
but if you're at a top hedge fund, i can't see any reason not to go with that. trading is all about who your mentor is, and who's to say you'll have a more attentive, more intelligent, more compassionate mentor on a Lehman trading desk than at some hedge fund? it really depends.
i would not recommend some prop trading firm or market maker, though, for starting out.
Ibanking/Trading Career Plan (Originally Posted: 09/05/2006)
My plan is to do ibanking for two years and then try trading at a bank or hedge fund. If trading doesn't work out I will go to b-school and will have my ibank training to fall back on if I want to continue with banking, private equity, or go into an industry after b-school.
Could someone please tell me if this is a good plan? I like the idea of trading but I am afraid that if it doesn't work out I will be kind of screwed.
Also how easy is it for ibankers to transfer into trading after two years? Do they start out at the bottom again? I am assuming that it easier to go from ibanking to trading then the other way around.
http://www.ibankingoasis.com/node/706
It's pretty unusual to go from ibanking to trading. And if you ask to move internally, you might find that you've volunteered for redundancy.
you are going to suck incredibly as a trader if you are so risk-adverse that you'd waste two years of your life (two miserable ones at that) just to build a career fallback option
What happens to traders who aren't good, where do they go? Also, what percentage of people starting out as traders are good enough to continue trading at a bank or hedge fund?
seriously...
H2O: I think the fact that they get fired is obvious. The real question is - what do they do then?
if they don't want to leave the industry, they find another job on the street. for example, some traders don't make money but sometimes have good trade ideas and very solid quant skills. i don't know what happens to the ones who left wall street unsuccessfully.
Ive been told by several successful traders that it isnt a bad idea to do banking then transfer over to trading. You learn so much more doing banking for 2 years than you would grabbing coffee for someone and keeping books up to date. Also, if you have an idea of what you may want to trade, you can probably jump into that area in banking and learn a lot about it. For instance, if you are interested in trading fixed income, jumping into lev fin for 2 years wouldnt be a bad idea. You make more money, and learn much more.
Qualify as an accountant first, then become an astronaut, after which I think I want to train as an investment banker. When I have my two year banking experience I will run for the presidency, my accountancy skills will help me rig elections and stuff and if that doesn't go well (or if I mess up at the banking stage) then my astronaut skills will help me deal with the fact that my head is in the clouds (cloud 9, or outer space?)
How realistic is my plan?
From the ghetto....
Sounds realistic to me, Tier2Sta. I went from (next to) the ghetto to Wall Street, and I'm not close to done yet (nor is that close to all of the neat stuff I've gotten to do since I dropped out at fourteen).
I know it's important to distinguish between pie-in-the-sky BS and actual possibility, but it's also important to believe and act as if the greatest career you can imagine is yours for the winning if you want to make the sacrifices. Because, in general, it is.
Intro, Trading vs. IBD (Originally Posted: 02/08/2007)
Hi guys, first time poster so be gentle. Allow myself to introduce...myself: 25 male, currently working at an I-Bank in NYC. However, I am not in IBD or Sales and Trading. I am in Pricing group (we price fixed income securities), concentrating on CDS. However, I will be attending Cornell MBA in the Fall and need some advice: We have to choose if we want to do Capital Markets or IBanking fairly quickly because we get put into Immersions that specialize. Now, I think I am made up to do Sales and Trading, just because I interace with those guys daily and it seems like a great atmosphere. However, I dont know too much about I banking. I assume I would be entering as an Associate instead of Analyst after MBA, but want to know the pros/cons of Sales&Trading vs. I-Banking. Any insight would be helpful. Thanks!
yes you would be an associate. i'm guessing you know what s&t is like. what type of 'pricing' is required in a flow product like cds though?
s&t:fast paced, flat hierarchy, limited exit opps ibd:slower paced, long hours, more hierarchical, great exit opps
Jimbo, again thanks for the response. When people say exit opps, do they mean exit opportunities? Ive seen the term around this board alot. And do exit opportunities mean more in terms of salary, or placement (heddge, PE), etc.
As far as CDS pricing goes, its complicated. Due to legal and SEC stuff, clients (hedge, custodians) need independant pricing (for NAV's, etc).
Ok...I mean you can price CDS in bloomberg or just get dealer runs, so i was confused. it should trade like an asset swap.
and yes exit opps for bankers seem to be pe and hedge funds. the pay in banking and s&t are obviously both very good, but the opps out of s&t are much more limited. pay at pe and hedge funds are also very good, especially at the more established places.
How hard is it to get into b-school from a bulge bracket S&T program. I understand it's not neccesary but what if you wanted to switch careers.
Can't you just directly infer CDS prices from the underlying bond yields?
corgi, that was my comment about asset swaps. but not CDS does not generally trade at the asset swap levels, b/c there's a whole funding/trading special aspect.
junior, i know a few ppl who have done it. i think you're slightly better off than ibanking in a way b/c it's rarer to be from s&t
Junior: I think you would have an easier time than many in terms of work experience, but keep in mind, that is one aspect of the whole application. You have to know how to play it up the best you can in your essays. I just got into Cornell and I currently work at IB that is not BB, but just below (hint: first name is that of an animal). Hope this helps,
cervantes, is this the FAST group? I used to know some people at Bear
Jimbo, I just sent you a PM
Remember if you go into S&T you can always go into IM or a HF if things don't turn out that well. Hell if the worst comes to the worst you can even day trade (though I haven't personally tried that myself).
I don't understand how bankers have better exit ops to HF than traders? aren't traders more prepared for that type of job?
Traders/sales/structuring definitely have better exit ops to the buyside. IB has better exit opps to PE (commodities S&T being the exception, there it is equal with IB). That said, you're talking about completely different types of work. Most people I know in S&T (myself included) have zero interest in the type of work people in IB or PE do on a regular basis. And vice versa. That said, sales jobs on a trading floor can start to resemble IB/PE very quickly.....
thanks skins1
you dont price cds off bonds or anything else, theres just CDS pricing models . a hedge fund can have one but then needs to be verified (ie. how do auditors know it is the correct model?). thus teh need for independent 3rd party and broker quotes, especially for off the run stuff.
seems like an arbitrage opportunity then if the CDS "derived" price differs from what the market price of default risk is for a given corporate bond.
if you dont wanna be a slave for 2 years and wanna have exciting work and get paid, go into s&T
why do you say that commodities S&T has equal exit opps to PE as IB?
corgi, in theory yes, but good luck sourcing the bonds sometimes...cds should trade similarly to the asset swap but not right on top of it.
iambateman: I was saying S&T has equal exit opps to energy PE. I'm mentioning it because PE firms focuses on energy are growing by the day, and unlike other PE firms, energy PE don't just go and recruit people from IB, they recruit a lot of people from commodities desk as well. For two reasons. First, you need both skill sets. Second, at some banks the commodities desks tend to "lead" energy deals because they have a large chunck of the contacts and expertise.
thanks for the clarification...that makes sense
i was thinking u were saying commodities s&T has equal opps to typical p/e buyout firms which wouldnt make sense...
If you're leaning towards S&T but aren't floored there are plently of groups in "capital markets" that are banking oriented. Most BB firms have capital markets separate from both IBD and S&T, right in the middle. Thus you interact with traders on daily basis if you're in Debt Capital Markets as well as with bankers on acqusition financings but less so if you're in a flow group like FIG for example where most underwriting is originated with the capital markets professionals and their relationships with client's treasurer.
Trading vs. IBD (Originally Posted: 12/02/2007)
I'm planning to transfer to the finance industry after I attend business school, but am having trouble deciding between trading and investment banking.
Background: I'm in the military, military academy grad (top 5% of class, 760 GMAT) I double-majored in Economics and Chinese (I'm an Irishman from Detroit; Chinese wasn't a purposeful GPA booster) I don't do anything quantitative in the military. I have the time to take all three CFA exams before business school and some extra calc/linear algebra. I have straight A's in econometrics, stats, finance, and accounting. I earned A's in all my calc-requiring engineering courses but only B's in calc freshman year.
I'm trying to figure out where I'm more likely to succeed and which division will pay me more. I know a few military folks who've gone into S&T, but they're all in sales. (I think) I wouldn't like sales as much as the IBD or trading. My goals are to live in Manhattan, enjoy being around my colleagues, and retire to a beach house in Duck, NC as soon as possible. Thoughts?
First, you're a military man. You probably go to West Point or the Citadel which are both amazing schools. You most likely have ridiculous self-discipline plus from what I see in your course load you are at least slightly quantitative. These two are probably the most important personality traits for a trader. You should go into trading, even think about foregoing B-School. It's unnecessary for you to be a superstar trader and since all you want to do it retire to a beach house ASAP, the sooner you learn to trade and the sooner you become proficient at it, the sooner you can leave.
Good luck man.
to become a superstar trader u need x factor and maybe a little luck. discipline will get u a lot farther in ibd
How would one qualify this magic "x factor"
I think you have better "skills" for IBD
good explanation
Sounds like you are doing great now (and as a US citizen I thank you for serving in the military). Business school could work well for you as you will meet lots of people who had been and will be on Wall Street. Go to the best BSchool you can and keep your eyes and ears open to see what people are telling you were their experiences. See what may be applicable to your skills and experiences. From a 50,000 foot view, x13 above is right, that IBD if you have the right attributes could be somewhat less risky as a career path. But my bottom line recommendation for you is don't pigeonhole yourself. Plenty of people will try to do that for you. Be flexible. No need to preordain your career path now.
IB or sales/trading? (Originally Posted: 04/25/2010)
I am currently pursuing my MBA at UofM Ross's evening MBA program. I will be done in summer or winter 2011...just depends on when I want to finish. Main reason for pursuing an MBA was to switch careers to i-banking. I've been doing a lot of reading (this forum, vault/wetfeet guides) trying to get a good gauge for which role(s) I will be best suited for.
I've been in sales (mortgages) for the last 9 yrs, 5 in management...so I initially was leaning towards institutional sales. I'm very confident in my sales abilities and feel that I can succeed right away in this role. Plus the work/life balance for a sales position is one that really appeals to me...I am married with a new born. However, exit ops seems to be limited...can you even make a transition to HF/PE coming from sale?? and once in sales, it seems like it will be difficult to make moves to areas within the same firm if you desired. And income potential isnt as high as other positions.
Going the IB route will lead to higher income potential, better exit ops, etc...but I basically wont see my family for the 1st couple of yrs. Plus I will be 36 when I graduate. Will i even have the drive/energy to pull all nighters regularly alongside twenty somethings?
Thoughts/advice??
You basically answered your own question. You have a family with a newborn, like the work/life balance of S&T, hate the work/life balance of IB, are confident in your ability to sell, and don't know if you have the drive to make it in IB. It's S&T for you, my friend.
As for exit opps, getting into PE isn't the holy grail. If you're good at S&T, sticking with it will still make you a good amount of money down the stretch.
my understanding is good sales guys make 1mm+ per year--getting in at 36 as an associate I think sales is a better option
also its less structured than banking which means you wont be surrounded by peers in their mid 20s...
I would pick whichever you want to make a career out of honestly.
Thanks all for the feedback. Good/top sales guys making $1mil+ per yr...I'm assuming that that these are the guys handling the top tier accts...curious typically how long it would take to get to those levels. While I feel sales is better suited for me, the biggest dilemma is how much longer do I want to be in sales....doing it for an IB will just be selling a different product. The things that I've enjoyed the most in my course work so far have been modeling and valuations stuff...
Are there any sales ppl on this board who can chime in? I would love to hear your view point.
Are you against considering the trading side?
I dont think I want to deal with the pace/stress that comes with trading. Plus I'm not necessarily sure I have the quant skills to excel in trading.
Dude, in general, there is no chance of an "exit opp" to PE for someone in your situation. I'd run hard after the job you want and make it your career.
It's a tough thing. Even in undergrad I remember people struggling with the question "IBD or S&T!?". Worry about it when that problem presents itself. 95% of people get neither.
sales is less glamorous at most bb's and is considered lesser front office
^^ Don't listen to iphoned, she has no idea what she is talking about and was retarded enough to start the "Rank every IBD group regardless of bank" thread. Sales guys make a lot of money. I know a lot of people that chose sales because they were better at it and did not like trading everyday.
goldman sales/trading vs baml ibd (Originally Posted: 02/09/2011)
as an sa which is better place to have more options full time
I would go with IBD, cuz you clearly live only for the exit opps...
...I assume you want IBD considering S&T at Goldman is amazing for many groups, choose the division over the name in this case. What if you don't get a FT offer after interviewing in the fall, but have a return offer. Choose where you want to be.
Goldman Sachs OMG ITS Goldman Sachs SERIOUSLY GO TO Goldman Sachs OMG ITS Goldman Sachs HOW COULD U TURN DOWN FREAKIN GOLDMAN SACHHHHS
Who cares which you would give you more FT options? Pick the one that is the route you want to go. Having a ton of S&T FT options doesn't really matter if you would prefer to do IBD and Visa versa.
Agree with nb84, decide if you want to do S&T or IBD first, then its an easy choice.
UCLA Medical Center or Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP?
haha clever
S&T Goldman you don't want to do banking...
Unless, of course, you DO want to do banking.
Differences between trading, PE, IB, HF, etc. (Originally Posted: 09/17/2014)
I spent this past summer interning, and I was amazed at how much clearer an industry becomes once you work in it. So I was wondering if anyone can enlighten me on what the important differences are between these industries. I don't care much about salary differences; I'd rather know where are entry-level employees doing the most research? How do exit opportunities work between these industries? How do the players in each of these industries interact with each other (for example, maybe a prop trading firm needs to be careful about huge institutional/HF orders, or maybe a PE firm is taking the investment recommendations of an IB)? Or anything else that seems to be helpful for someone like me, who hasn't had too much finance experience. Thanks!
If you do some digging on this site, you'll come across some very insightful posts in the comment section about every single one of those industries. Often times those are far more insightful than any answer to a post like yours because they are often in response to a very specific question which lends a much better insight into their world.
I've found it fascinating. Particularly the comments about restructuring.
Investment Banking vs. Fixed-Income Trading (Originally Posted: 12/26/2014)
I haven't made a decision yet over whether to work in investment banking division or fixed-income trading when I graduate from university. Which summer internship is better after freshman year. I guess a summer internhip in IBD will be better for learning financial modeling etc. What do you guys think about?
IBD->S&T easier than S&T->IBD. Get an IBD internship if you can.
IBD vs Trading for exit to HF (Originally Posted: 08/23/2015)
deleted
I think this is highly dependent on investment style. I haven't worked in any of the stated professions, but just wanted to point out that number 2 above is wrong. It does not take someone 3-5 years to move from IB to HF. It can actually be done in less than a year in some cases and typically in 1-2 from what I've seen.
It depends what you want to do at the HF. Bankers usually become Analysts-->PM. Traders stick to trading. Both analyze companies, but in different ways. It also depends on the size/sophistication of the fund because there can definitely be overlap (at small funds the PM is usually also the Trader).
I would say banking without a doubt -
I have seen probably less than 3 (out of probably over a hundred) former traders at an analyst position at a fundamental equity or debt fund. Every single one has been banking, PE (usually banking plus PE) or equity research. Traders go into trading at hedge funds or into more macro funds
It keeps doors open for other paths like PE, corp dev, business school that are either impossible (PE) or tougher (MBA) out of trading. Note that PE is also a large hunting ground for hedge fund analyst positions
Obviously banking. And many top analysts can leave for a top HF after 1 year of banking, there's no set recruiting schedule like there is with PE.
Go talk to any of the top 5 headhunters and they'll tell you.
About 3 months ago, I would've agreed with you and wso_user, but after talking to several people within ibd, trading, ER, and the buyside, I'm pretty sure the hype for ibd is all groupthink. Just a quick LinkedIn search of people at HFs such as Bridgewater and DEShaw will show a handful of people with trading backgrounds. Furthermore, is it even safe to say that a HF trader has a worse shot at PM than an analyst? A friend of mine interned at a large fund and said PMs were split half and half with their backgrounds.
Look at the strategy first.
No one at Bridgewater is actually doing real meaningful work, which is quite well known. DE Shaw recruits from ugrad, 90% for back office. Did you look into what type of strategy it is?
No PM I've ever met was a trader (long/short fund). Don't know why I bother responding to these threads, go talk to anyone at Dynamics and ask for yourself.
If you want to do fundamental equity/credit investing (including distressed) then IB is almost assuredly your best bet.
If you want to be a global macro PM then my (slightly educated) guess is you'd want to start out on a buyside trading desk and work your way up.
are you suggesting starting at a prop shop for GM? I've always found the idea of starting out at a prop shop to be very interesting (and risky). I'm not convinced however that's a good idea out of undergrad (unless its Jane Street Capital or something). From my searches (mostly linkedin) and conversations with traders at BBs, HFs recruit sell-side traders actively for trading positions.
Ok, let's think like a trader. Which option gives you the most upside? Which option is less risky long term? Are you 100% sure that you'll NEVER change your mind about HFs? You sure trading trumps banking for recruiting?
Take DickFuld for instance, he went into trading as his end goal, why? Because it's a pure meritocracy, where a very concrete scoreboard determined his cash at the end of the year. Not to lateral into a different field. Hopefully you're picking up what I'm putting down.
If you want to be a PM at a global macro fund then the skills you'll learn in investment banking are fairly useless.
If you want to be an analyst/PM at a fundamental L/S Equity/Credit fund then sell-side flow trading is not the correct path.
Period. Full Stop. The End. Fin. Fade to Black. Audience goes fucking apeshit.
Bump
Bump. Sorry to bring it up. But need to make the same choice in this week. Anything change in 2017 with the prospect of trading going more automatic?
The Difference Between Investment Banking (Originally Posted: 04/19/2012)
Hey everyone, I know this is a really simple question, but I was wondering-- what exactly is the difference between Trading and Investment Banking? How do their workloads, education/training, etc. differ? Thanks!
//www.wallstreetoasis.com/frequently-asked-questions
For some reason the links don't work for me on that FAQ page but try them and see if that works for you. Otherwise, you will find all of your answers by using the fucking search.
Maybe I just haven't noticed, but there seems to be an immense influx of new users with very little common sense.
Isn't Google easier for this kind of shit?
You're a horrible person for bothering us with such muppet speak
You're all arrogant fucking assholes. Go suck a chimp dick. This guy has an honest question(possibly)and you fuckers cant give him a straight forward answer. So an investment bank sucks to work for and trading is considered a much more highly desired job in the industry. Investment banking is seen as a rite of passage in the world of finance which is what many traders have to go through before achieving a somewhat desirable position such as a trader. Hope this helps.
Agree with this.
Excuse Me Sir,
Could I interest you in the x90 tranche of the IG9 index? It will add great downside protection to your portfolio.
CrashIsOptimistic......get a fucking life and stop trying to talk down to me through you arrogant esoteric jargon.
No need to get hostile...
It also appears to me that I am a senior chimp and you are only a chimp. This clearly makes me more of a man. Have a nice life living in the shitholes of many BB IBDs.
Excuse me Sir,
Those "BB's" are some of the most elite institutions in the history of the world. They recruit and maintain some of the smartest and most intelligent people in the world. Working for one should be the goal of any self-respecting human being.
Someone's got serious jokes. Good luck in your hard quest associated with being non-target fucking scum.
Ehouse, I will answer your question without arrogance. Trading involves the active involvement in financial markets. This entails trading all types of securities to fill the needs of the bank and its clients. Workweeks are similiar to that of a "normal" job, 40-60 hours a week. Investment Banking includes, but is not limited to, a bank advising two companies on a merger or acquisition. This requires investment banking analysts to do extensive modeling and do other client service tasks. The workload is tremendous, 100+hours per week at some banks.
Connor. If that helps you sleep at night. Non-target scum im guessing?
O really. Name your alma mater good sir.
I'd rather not, but I can assure you that it's ranked higher than Duke, which is where I assume you went.
Well large assumption there sir. How do i know your're not blowing wind out your ass.
Does it really matter? I'm sure I'll see you in the trenches one day.
Unlikely, already a partner. Good luck.
No but really, go fuck yourself. No offense.
Quite welcome.
This was actually an entertaining battle...
traders trade and bankers bank. its kinda like that one song, something about haters hating and ballers balling..
IBD4LIFE, non-target scum really? dude, you definitely got Connor good with that one. especially because he goes to a target. However, you did manage to indirectly take a shot at a good portion of this sites members.
take the dick out of your ass before you speak next time. or better yet, dont speak anymore
simply enjoying the trolling in this thread
What division do I fit into: S&T or IB? (Originally Posted: 05/28/2014)
I am currently interested in a career in both investment banking and S&T. At the moment, I am unsure which division best fits my personality and strengths, and where I might have the potential for success (if finance is for me at all). I do prefer the look of IB slightly more than S&T, I would also like to know what skills you would say are the most important for investment banking.
I have strong analytical skills
Very good at mental arithmetic
I have quite good instinct, I can tell whether someone is trying to rip me off or I straight away know what type of person someone is straight away as I meet them.
Lastly, I like to think of myself as quite sociable. (I'm assuming this fits more sales?)
I don't mean to come off as conceited or anything, I'm just trying to see whether a career in finance is for me or whether I should look at another industry. Any comments will be appreciated, thanks.
Based on the information provided, you could probably swing either choice. It really depends on which area piques your interest most. It would probably help if you networked more with professionals in both areas to help you make up your mind.
You should ask to shadow someone in S&T and see what you think. Dont sit there like a mute deaf. Ask questions about things that will really give you a good idea what the job is about.
I'm not sure if there's real shadowing in banking other than meeting people, shaking hands, and spending a few minutes or getting coffee. Either way, do the legwork and put in some effort. No one here knows you so it's pretty useless to ask us.
Of course, I guess I don't have to tell you this, since you're so good at reading people. I was just a little worried, since you thought it was worth mentioning here.
What's more math based: IB or S&T? (Originally Posted: 12/09/2009)
I'm fairly good with numbers, but I'd prefer the division that is less math intensive.
This is a gross generalization but I think IB is less math intensive then S&T, but it really depends on what you are trading. Either way I hope you are not solely deciding between IB and S&T based on the required mathematical aptitude. Which division you pick should really depend on your interests and future career goals.
Excel does most of the math in IB
Quisquam distinctio recusandae illo molestiae. Consequatur placeat nostrum et ea dolores molestias. Inventore itaque sint necessitatibus. Expedita aut nihil laboriosam quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptas esse nesciunt vero nostrum autem et similique sequi. Vero ducimus odit ea aut nihil eos quasi. Repellat est est consequuntur repellat sit soluta et.
Dolores aut nisi officia quis quibusdam. Sit eum quis quibusdam nobis recusandae quibusdam nostrum commodi. At dolor totam laboriosam assumenda modi. Asperiores rerum et nostrum totam. Unde ea rerum autem aut quasi.
Est doloribus aliquid et rem eos quos. Aut distinctio ut unde laudantium rerum eligendi. Omnis vero voluptatem dolor dolor et.
Animi voluptas aut veritatis ut. Velit pariatur inventore error in nam eos vitae. Alias qui amet excepturi numquam dolor vel similique. Voluptatem aut at quo incidunt molestiae voluptatem. Nisi minus esse aut minus impedit.
Impedit ducimus facere autem et rerum tempore beatae. Distinctio aut laudantium quia sequi. Illo quas debitis ut sed. Perferendis laboriosam asperiores dolorem minus. Aut eius necessitatibus laborum corrupti est quasi in.
Id fuga cum aut quisquam minima. Nemo impedit qui magni molestias. Sit expedita omnis nisi illum doloremque.
Qui ullam natus error et. Quia quis consequatur aut culpa vero aliquam nesciunt ea. Vitae quisquam dolore minus quia ut est veniam. Rerum eius modi dolorem alias corrupti et aut.
Omnis ratione impedit qui similique est cumque. Consequatur recusandae sint et error accusantium a. Quas saepe omnis illo iure optio. Sequi exercitationem ut nostrum voluptate. Laboriosam quisquam eligendi adipisci rem dolor ea velit. Voluptate ea iure ratione in possimus facere qui.
Voluptatum incidunt aliquid et voluptatem amet et. Totam natus quia ut quae repellat voluptas. Nihil voluptatem pariatur quasi quod. Expedita sed officiis nesciunt distinctio. Laboriosam dignissimos ut consequatur consequuntur eius quo vel.
Asperiores tenetur sit voluptatem similique aspernatur accusantium consequatur omnis. Voluptatem recusandae quo nisi voluptatem qui.
Cumque iure illo voluptate. Exercitationem hic optio non dolorem non ut.
Id ipsam ipsam suscipit et in autem laborum. Cupiditate consequatur vel ratione officiis perspiciatis. Odio ab sed dolores tempora neque. Ratione rem quod eveniet officiis perspiciatis ut et. Tempora dolores hic quis rerum. Velit accusantium ad quia et porro adipisci expedita.
Quibusdam quas placeat omnis et impedit ut magnam. Non soluta earum ipsa. Dignissimos aut assumenda quia facere eveniet deserunt aliquam. Qui voluptates blanditiis iure molestiae ea eos.
Molestiae incidunt expedita nesciunt totam sint. Enim culpa eius cumque repellat provident. Dolorem omnis natus id doloremque laboriosam dolores aut quos.
Non officia quo dolor et ullam quisquam facilis cum. Modi reiciendis est consequatur aut et tempora.
Enim ut quasi excepturi voluptas nam nihil. Non dicta vel ullam qui quo aut.
Non iure voluptas aut earum quia ut. Optio doloremque hic magnam debitis illo. Atque tenetur quia aperiam minima earum ex vel. Consequatur quibusdam sunt harum aut amet ut. Qui quos nihil non est debitis quisquam. Suscipit et quas eligendi pariatur eaque. Amet ut eveniet veritatis adipisci rerum.
Ipsum non odio ut commodi. Ut quisquam amet a et.
Sit molestias porro natus. Iure rerum aspernatur numquam dolor unde ipsum sit consequatur. Tempore quisquam est aliquam. Tempore iusto error est et. Voluptatem quae quisquam illo omnis laborum consectetur minus.
Necessitatibus aspernatur reprehenderit id provident. At velit molestiae sit saepe ex esse. Qui et est iure rem ut unde. Est quod sed id explicabo blanditiis qui.