Converting British grades to GPA?

Hi guys, I'm an American who's looking to returning to work in the States after graduating from the LSE.

So far I have a 2:1 average score, and I was just wondering if I should put that on my resume, post my individual grades, (I did better than a 2:1 in econometrics but worse in micro) or convert my 2:1 to a GPA. Thing is, I looked all over the LSE website and couldn't find a definite equal GPA.

Thanks for any help!

UK Grades to GPA



British Class American GPA Secured Marks Level(%)
First Tier 4.00 70+
Upper Second Tier 3.7 65-69
Upper Second Tier 3.3 60-64
Lower Second Tier 3.0 55-59
Lower Second Tier 2.7 50-54
Third Tier 2.3 45-49
Third Tier 2.00 40-44

This table is the standard for The Fulbright Commission. However, that does not mean that this table should be used for reporting on applications or CV's.

Recommended Reading

 

I had the same problem and I just wrote my UK degree classification but really unless the person reviewing the resume is familiar with the different grading system I don't think there is any way to accurately convert it. In the UK, 2.1 or above just acts as a threshold thats usually good enough for all but the most competitive places but really it covers a huge spectrum of students so a conversion to GPA would be misleading. Having said that, I think the link below gives a reasonable idea what the range should be like and a good 2.1 should be more or less an A- in the US.

http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-education-advisors-us-study-abroad-FAQs.htm

 

Also at the LSE.

I would just put the class you graduate - distinction or merit. Correct me if I'm wrong, but a 2.1 is equal to merit and a 2.2 is distinction.

 

2.1 could be anything from 3.0 to 3.7, since basically anyone in roughly the top half of the class gets a 2.1. For graduate programs the requirement for UK students is a 2.1, while the requirement for US students is 3.5. So perhaps that's a reasonable rough equivalency.

 

I read awhile back after scouring the net (as I am in the same position, studying in UK), that roughly speaking a low 2.1 (60-64) is considered to be equivalent to 3.4/3.5 and that between 65 and 69 takes you up from 3.6-3.9....70+ is a 4.0. Now to me this all seems a bit quacky, but to guide you this is what it seems to be. You're original estimates weren't too far off, just when aiming for that 2.1 try to top 65.

Of course, you have to account for difficulties of school and courses taken, which is a calculation beyond the abilities of most i-banking shit flingers. Hope this helps

 

Its a screwy system, where they take your four highest grades and take the average of those. That way, if you can clench 4 2.1s in your second year, you only need to pass your final year (or work on getting higher grades), but that safety net is there.

 
Best Response

Yes, 65 means an average of 65%. However, (with the exception of sciences and maths) essays and exams are discursive rather than YES/NO questions so 65% means producing a good essay rather than getting two-thirds of the questions right.

In the UK you are awarded degree classes (all degrees are honours) rather than a percentage. The rule of thumb is:

less than 40 = Fail 40-49 = Third Class 50-59 = Lower Second (2.2) 60-69 = Upper Second (2.1) 70+ = First

However, the method for calculating degree class varies from university to university. Some take the top 5 (out of 12 modules) from your final two years. Some take a simple average from the last two and others take an average from all your three years. Also, if you get 68+ the department can push you up a class at their discretion (they look at your overall marks and your tutor's assement of you).

Although a 2.1 is equivalent to a 3.6 and 1st to a 4.0 in terms of its position on the distribution (i.e roughly as many students get 2.1s in the UK as they do 3.6 in the US) I'd just put your degree class (2.2/2.1/1) without trying to convert it since the quality of British degrees are MUCH higher than their equivalents across the Atlantic. Some US universities consider the last year of secondary school to be roughly equivalent to the first year of American university - and most UK universities make transfers from the US repeat the first year. The main difference is that British degrees are incredibly focused, based almost totally around end of year exams and give little or no credit to gimmes like multiple choice tests, class discussion etc (or what we Brits would refer to derisively as 'continuous assesment').

I'd even go so far as to claim that you could reasonably get away with 2.2=3.6 conversion in absolute terms(though a 2.1 is considered the minimum for UK BB's). Having done postgrad work with graduates from top liberal arts colleges and the Ivy League I found that they were usually 6 moths behind their British colleagues when they started the course.

 

Getting a 1st class degree in the UK (70+ average over 2 or 3 years) is about the same difficulty as getting a 4.60-4.80 GPA (out of 4.00) at a US High School. If you're doing all AP classes and getting straight A's in HS, you will average above 70 in the UK (above 80 in a Science or Engineering degree).

And yes, you can average 60% on all your exams and coursework for 2 years and get a great job at a BB. It may be difficult to comprehend, but that is how huge the cultural difference is in the education system. It is a deep-rooted difference that makes neither system better nor worse.

 

You mean in relative terms don't you? I doub't even the stanchest defender of the US system would claim that American HS are better than UK Degrees (though I know a few people who would make comparison between A-Levels and degrees from less prestigious US universities).

 

Et error voluptatum sit enim debitis iure. Ipsa quam minima non et dolorem dolores. Dolore aut voluptas molestiae unde. Suscipit ut sunt ab qui in mollitia pariatur. Sunt dolores voluptas inventore omnis repellat.

Illo veniam illo blanditiis aut natus quos modi. Ab non nulla tenetur et ipsam in voluptas et. Est consequuntur nesciunt ut non.

 

Aut aliquid nihil enim earum perspiciatis. Itaque ab iusto explicabo officia qui. Hic et harum excepturi magni rerum. Pariatur quo neque sed nemo qui voluptatem rem.

Cupiditate et fugit error dolor. Dolor facilis et ut dolores inventore.

Eos dolorum recusandae nemo quo in voluptatem. Cupiditate provident alias voluptatem et repudiandae quos.

Quaerat sit itaque perspiciatis. Doloremque occaecati dolorum neque consequatur quia rerum. Et accusantium voluptas modi et rerum ratione. Sit voluptatem praesentium laboriosam fugiat ut et. Modi dolor sapiente pariatur amet mollitia eos aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”