If there was a Mount Rushmore of the most corrupt companies, who would you put on it?
My votes would be:
- Enron (This site is a huge fan of their former CEO)
- Scientology (Self explanatory)
- Bayer (Recently acquired Monsanto)
Trending Content
| +106 | When you can’t measure up | 13 | 1d | |
| +82 | Zoomers are doing life wrong | 25 | 1d | |
| +52 | How to get rid of prestige obsession | 24 | 1d | |
| +44 | How to develop a thick skin? | 22 | 3d | |
| +36 | Analysts & Crying | 13 | 2d | |
| +33 | Insurance as High Finance? | 10 | 8h | |
| +29 | Would you rather live alone in an outer borough or with roommates in Manhattan? | 21 | 11h | |
| +27 | Framed Photo of CEO on desk. | 14 | 2d | |
| +23 | BO -> ??? | 14 | 3d | |
| +20 | Anyone ever invest in a gym? | 10 | 6d |
Career Resources
Theranos, Drexel, the Clinton foundation, university of Phoenix
Drexel the University?
No - Clyde Drexler
No Drexel ala Michael milken
Yeah I mean you can't get more corrupt than destroying half of all life in the universe....
IT WAS FOR A GOOD CAUSE, THANOS WAS RIGHT.
The most corruption will be seen in any industry that hinges mostly on government making a decision (permits, patents, permission, or direct subsidy) rather than the broad population. Real estate, infrastructure, chemicals, power, natural resources extraction, healthcare, financial services would be good places for starters.
Dow Chemical (see Bhopal Gas Tragedy cover up)
Actually it was Union Carbide, not Dow. Dow acquired UC about 20 years later.
But I still remember images from this. I was in high school and one really tragic image was of a young child's face, dead, with their eyes still open, surrounded by rubble. Haunting, to say the least, to think of the thousands that died and the 10's of thousands that were impacted over the years.
Ah right, thank you for correcting me. Just associated with Dow nowadays since they acquired UC, but important to note that Dow never owned that plant and did not assume UC's liabilities for those reading.
Thank you for the correction!
Drexel the University?
Unfortunately, there's more corruption than many of us will ever know. Money really is the most important thing in the world to many people.
He's referring to Drexel Burnham Lambert, Michael Milken's old firm.
I can't tell you how old I feel seeing this question asked twice.
Enron Worldcom Theranos Allied Capital
This is more like "best of the worst." In reality the world's most corrupt companies will be ones that haven't been caught, or have been caught but there are no consequences. Gazprom, Sinopec, East India Company, etc.
Equifax
+1 to this, Equifax is the worst.
As it relates to the data breach I'd call Equifax more negligent/stupid than corrupt. Otherwise they're really no worse than the other two bureaus.
Agree with you. Read an article on Equifax regarding its corporate governance issues during/after the breach. Apparently they tried to fix it and did not disclose for a long time. Also their tech committee on the board is basically a place for new directors (no tech background required) to learn and get up to speed. On top of those, there were also allegations of insider trading where some directors sold their EFX share after the breach and before the announcement.
Milken was not corrupt. Look at him in the context of what was going on back then and it's easy to see the SEC wanted a scapegoat. Milken funded American companies like CNN, and has since done amazing things for cancer research. The guy pretty much single handedly funded huge deals. When you build a firm that quickly shit happens and unfortunately the SEC (AKA lawyers too dumb to work anywhere real) had a hard on for him.
No he was definitely corrupt. He essentially stole millions and millions of dollars from his employer through giving himself warrants and other trading abuses. In addition he convinced a few savings and loans and insurance companies to make extremely reckless gigantic investments in his bonds, bankrupting them, and bribed other fiduciaries to invest in his bonds. There is nothing wrong with high-yield bonds or his creation of them per se, his corruption is all about all of his other abuses. In addition, he was more prosecuted on relative technicalities that his actual main crimes simply because it was easier to do so.
That firm was worthless before him. He was the firm. He didn't steal anything.
I haven't looked at it in depth but surely natural resource firms operating in Africa, or most third world countries, would be right up there?
Swedbank are looking seriously dodgy at the moment, but that's money laundering so depends if we're counting that under corruption.
I'd argue that money laundering can be separate but still just as bad as corruption. As a financial institution you're basically looking at someone else's crime or corruption and saying, "Let's facilitate this and make money off it ourselves."
Odebrecht, the Brazilian construction and oil company, would be a serious contender. They admitted to having paid bribes to politicians in 12 countries and more cases are under investigation.
The FIFA organisation was/is involved in multiple corruption cases too. But we don't have to worry. They removed corruption as an official misdemeanour from their latest code of ethics. And clearly something that doesn't exist can't happen.
Enron PetroBras/PDVSA/GAZPROM Theranos 1MDB
SAC Capital; Steven A. Cohen
In my line of work we keep up on the bad news that comes out about other FIs. I feel like at this stage it's really unusual to find a national or multinational bank that isn't getting caught doing sleazy shit.
Nevertheless, fuck HSBC in particular.
Based on recent discoveries, there are definitely a few freshly minted contenders for the crown: 1. 1MDB. 2. City of London Corporation. 3. Bitcoin Exchanges.
Check out American Greed. I know I can’t be the only one on this site that watches the show.
There are plenty of smaller firms and people that have caused immense pain to Mom and Pop investors (the type of people who are in their sixties who will never recover from a loss of a million dollars), cheated the government, and abused the poor. I have an unhealthy obsession with that show.
Oh, and a side note, the people who invested with the optionsellers.com guy are technically worse off than those that invested with Maddoff. The madoff investors actually recovered SOME money while I believe the investors from optionsellers actually lost everything and owed money.
I'll add Salesforce after the news that broke yesterday...
salesforce did nothing wrong
Goldman Sachs , Lehman Brothers have to be up there
Really? Why would that be? There’s certainly nothing fraudulent that happened at Lehman. Bad risk management, sure, but not fraud.
Goldman: 1MDB, misleading central banks of quality of Greek sovereign debt...forget it just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs_controversies#Stock_price_m…
Lehmans: because you worked there you nefarious MOFO
Royal Dutch Shell. The stuff they've done in and to Nigeria is nuts!
Liberal Arts Colleges
1- Big Pharma companies (thousand of reasons...high drug prices meanwhile the ceo's compensation is 100+ millions ) oh and did you know the inventor of insuline did not patented it to make it accessible and saves lives but big pharma is making a killing out of it?
2- BB that operates in financial havens : during the credit crunch it was stated that those banks stayed in the game because they had liquidity from crime money (drugs, laundering, stolen...)
3- Defense companies ; they give you the illusion that they protect your country but in fact they sell weapons to everyone including your ennemies and they overcharge you both
4-Elite universities : recent bribe admissions scandal....
Enron, HSBC, Odebrecht, McKinsey
Laughed - people in ‘developped’ countries talking about corruption. Go to emerging markets to truly observe corruption. ‘How did he get this deal? Well he paid X person’ applied to ME/Asia/South America - seen it happen first hand.
Sahara Computers
Provident corrupti eaque nostrum qui iste quo. Voluptate a consequatur iste repudiandae nesciunt. Repellendus nisi in sit mollitia. Blanditiis molestiae qui earum aperiam perferendis in.
Sint aut accusantium voluptate. Repudiandae aspernatur voluptate suscipit iure minima ex impedit soluta. Animi minima est omnis cupiditate tempora omnis ab sunt. Corrupti maxime illum eaque eveniet necessitatibus enim aut. Optio nemo delectus deserunt deleniti blanditiis.
Voluptatem natus ea quis. Laudantium quam pariatur et nulla. Quia vero eius non qui et. Perferendis iusto distinctio qui amet. Sit a quis ipsum eum dolore.
Ducimus molestiae autem consequuntur omnis nostrum earum qui. Sint ut illum tempore fugiat vel eaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestiae quia maxime cumque libero voluptates. Maxime aperiam sapiente odio commodi repudiandae. Cumque molestiae iusto repudiandae perspiciatis qui. Animi debitis doloremque hic et vel corrupti. Quasi in quis molestias dolor quis.
Ut blanditiis alias consectetur deserunt autem. Vero adipisci fugit consequatur. Libero voluptatem aut qui ad officiis. Deleniti enim sit dolorum quisquam incidunt voluptatum numquam.
Corporis accusantium consequatur magnam laudantium cum vero rerum. Dignissimos et aut a perspiciatis est voluptatum facilis. Iusto cum est hic molestiae ipsam dolorum. Recusandae perferendis rerum sint voluptatem aspernatur sint. Quam accusamus dolores aut veritatis mollitia nihil numquam.
Voluptas cum rerum itaque quas est incidunt fuga. Asperiores eaque rerum impedit voluptatem reiciendis aut recusandae.
Ducimus et a corrupti sed expedita nisi sed. Et et reprehenderit eligendi est rerum. Et nihil aliquid dolor non maiores ipsam.
Consectetur et dolores libero odit expedita. Cumque illum quia sit minus qui totam reprehenderit repellendus. Dolore earum eum vitae molestiae error. Earum eum sequi est saepe dolorem eum. Doloremque delectus officia modi earum et.
Aliquam deleniti ea non illo quam esse aut sequi. Velit delectus nulla sed. Qui quasi illum nulla ut aliquid molestiae nesciunt.