Two listed companies have the exact same Financial Statements, yet the P/E Multiple of company A is 2x the P/E of B. Why?

I got this question in an internship interview recently. I listed a potential recent lawsuit, the general economic differences in each respective country and a recent earnings miss by the lower valued company as possible reasons.

I personally think that these answers aren't bad, yet the interviewer literally responded with: "That answer was rather disappointing. Next one". Can you think of a reason why he said that?

 

Well you are missing the point.. What matters is what the market was expecting. For example two companies could have announced the same earning say 100. But if the market was expecting 120 for one company (could be due to higher growth expected) and 100 for the second. So, the financial result is the same for both but the market is likely to dislike first company for the miss and multiple will drop as a result

 
artur17777:
Well you are missing the point.. What matters is what the market was expecting. For example two companies could have announced the same earning say 100. But if the market was expecting 120 for one company (could be due to higher growth expected) and 100 for the second. So, the financial result is the same for both but the market is likely to dislike first company for the miss and multiple will drop as a result

I see what you're trying to do. But if two companies have the exact same financial statements, then they should have the same growth profile.

 

What if two companies are in different industries? What if the market thinks that one company has some sort of advantage which is not reflected in financial statements, such as reputation, brand name, whatever...(and that's why is exptected to have a better growth). I don't think that if two companies have excat same financials then they should have the same growth profile. So many factors matter. Give you one more example, if topline of one company has been growing at 15% annauly and topline of the second company has been growing at 5% (but it was in the business for longer). So emagine these two companies having the same financials at some point in time, but fisrt company has shown a faster growth and achieved the results of the more mature company within a much shorter period, thus might deserve a higher multiple. Obviosuly mupltiples are not just based on growth. This is just what i am thinking and not necessarilycorrect

 
Most Helpful
artur17777:
What if two companies are in different industries? What if the market thinks that one company has some sort of advantage which is not reflected in financial statements, such as reputation, brand name, whatever...(and that's why is exptected to have a better growth). I don't think that if two companies have excat same financials then they should have the same growth profile. So many factors matter. Give you one more example, if topline of one company has been growing at 15% annauly and topline of the second company has been growing at 5% (but it was in the business for longer). So emagine these two companies having the same financials at some point in time, but fisrt company has shown a faster growth and achieved the results of the more mature company within a much shorter period, thus might deserve a higher multiple. Obviosuly mupltiples are not just based on growth. This is just what i am thinking and not necessarilycorrect

If in different industries, then financial statements are not "exactly the same". Revenue is different, margins are different, metrics are different, profitability is different, balance sheet is different, cash flows are different, literally everything will be different if in different industries.

 

Overall I don’t think that u said something wrong. Your answers are correct, but probably they lacked detail. Anyway, in my opinion there is no reason for the interviewer to say that the answer is disappointing unless you say something completely wrong

 

This is the correct answer. One company might have a new product or something else anticipated to increase its growth rate relative to the other company, despite identical growth rates (and margins, CF, leverage, etc.) in the past.

A theoretical earnings miss wouldn't create a PE disparity, it would only correct one that existed before, as investors would bid the stock of the company that missed down until that company's PE matched that of the nearest comp.

 

Think most of the answers here are very markets-focussed (relative valuation multiples etc).

I would approach this by going through the drivers of a DCF. A is worth more than B when: - Better top line growth - Better profitability expectations - Lower capex - Lower NWC requirements - Lower effective tax rate

Additionally: potential for public offer / synergy potential of such a deal

 

I believe your asnwer is correct but again it comes down to what the market is thinking. Like if the market is thinking that the company is going to need less capex or lower NWC needs to achieve the same growth of company B then its gonna give a higer multiple to company A

 

Tempora dolore veritatis officia ea ex dolorum qui. Consequatur nesciunt id quasi ipsum veritatis nisi debitis. Dolores sed enim iure et qui aut. Corrupti facere quidem id unde veritatis. Eligendi ipsa repellat dolor minima perspiciatis ut.

Expedita ut pariatur ut totam asperiores illo enim. Nihil facilis qui facilis nam et nihil. Quia repellat ipsam perspiciatis sunt. Ut occaecati ut velit dolores minus. Ut voluptatem tempore et eum. Magnam eos non repellat.

Necessitatibus et dolor laborum harum. Aut voluptatem quis cupiditate a. Minus nostrum id nemo ut magnam quaerat nulla odio. Illo porro asperiores sunt explicabo saepe facilis possimus natus. Neque quae sit rerum rerum eligendi eligendi a maxime.

Fugit ipsam dolor non fugiat id repellat. Eveniet quisquam optio in sit consequatur quisquam aspernatur. Odio et nostrum assumenda illo animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”