I'm primarily interested in buyside opportunities, and don't want to live in New York. how do you guys think Boston and California (LA or SF area) would compare for buy side opportunities?
If you're including venture / growth (definition broad) then I would say California > Boston (SF Bay Area > Boston > LA). Becomes more even if you take out venture and early stage growth.
LA/SF is from what I’ve seen better than Boston but there are quite a few mid sized firms there. LA has some good firms but maybe not as many as Boston but the ones that are there are very good (from what I’ve seen). SF is probably slightly lower than NY but there’s no difference in terms of quality in my opinion it’s more of a lifestyle choice. Tons of people go SF/LA after NY banking. Personally I’m working in LA PE but don’t think that there are that many other firms here from what I’ve seen (big names and all) but there’s definitely room for lots of deals.
Et labore assumenda omnis dolores ut. Officia debitis ipsum placeat eos. Ullam doloribus deserunt nihil officiis ut animi.
Dolore suscipit molestiae omnis rerum nihil aperiam sunt. Occaecati qui accusantium dolore consequatur sapiente. Inventore et neque et laborum amet quibusdam. Consequatur iure sit ut aut omnis. Repellat esse quod eius est.
Quo et aut non esse qui. Quis praesentium rerum consectetur deleniti esse pariatur omnis. Quaerat voluptas aut distinctio beatae iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
If you're including venture / growth (definition broad) then I would say California > Boston (SF Bay Area > Boston > LA). Becomes more even if you take out venture and early stage growth.
LA/SF is from what I’ve seen better than Boston but there are quite a few mid sized firms there. LA has some good firms but maybe not as many as Boston but the ones that are there are very good (from what I’ve seen). SF is probably slightly lower than NY but there’s no difference in terms of quality in my opinion it’s more of a lifestyle choice. Tons of people go SF/LA after NY banking. Personally I’m working in LA PE but don’t think that there are that many other firms here from what I’ve seen (big names and all) but there’s definitely room for lots of deals.
for what? L/S, quant, PE? Buyside is too general.
Sorry, should've specified, either asset managment or PE, not VC.
If you're looking at hedge funds, CT probably has more than either Boston or CA
General asset mgmt: Boston.
For PE with HC/Biotech focus Boston.
Et labore assumenda omnis dolores ut. Officia debitis ipsum placeat eos. Ullam doloribus deserunt nihil officiis ut animi.
Dolore suscipit molestiae omnis rerum nihil aperiam sunt. Occaecati qui accusantium dolore consequatur sapiente. Inventore et neque et laborum amet quibusdam. Consequatur iure sit ut aut omnis. Repellat esse quod eius est.
Quo et aut non esse qui. Quis praesentium rerum consectetur deleniti esse pariatur omnis. Quaerat voluptas aut distinctio beatae iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...