Most Helpful

LTM generally useless for equity investing except to maybe give context for how different forward projections are. LTM also typically used for transaction multiples (although idk if this is still the case... see SpAC deals underwriting 2024 transaction multiples lol). Credit investors tend to underwrite debt investments on an LTM basis because at least that has been something that the company has proved they could do already vs some optimistic view of the future

 

So for equity investing, which multiple matters more when comparing NTM to forward Y2 vs Forward Y3 multiples or do multiples 2-3 years out really only matter for growth companies?

 

No science to it, depends on the industry. People look at current YE (2020) estimates and 1-2 years out but everyone underwrites investments differently. Some may do a DCF and say the current multiple is too low (lol rates are 0 so I guess all multiples are too low now on a DCF basis). I’d say stick to fiscal year 2020, 2021 multiples and have less of a focus on NTM vs LTM... maybe I’m wrong on that but you can’t get so fixated on these things

 

Half the time there’s no consensus that you can uniformly say is on X multiple on a forward looking basis. Generally it’s always on forward and you can always use your own projections to create said forward multiple view. Common in transactions to just do LTM as only thing to go by. Both NTM and LTM can be deceiving in their own ways.

 

When you hear people on TV talking in general what multiple a security is trading at are they referring to the NTM multiple? I understand now LTM is most commonly used for transactions

 

I find it amusing that when a company does deal that they over pay for they tout the ntm ev/ebitda post synergy multiple to make the price paid sound better. Now that ntm will be lower for a lot of companies compared to ltm, starting to see a shift to trailing multiples being used more often.

 

Ducimus officiis dignissimos eius a. Est ut est nesciunt deserunt excepturi.

Laboriosam sequi rerum in. Animi sunt eligendi et atque ut ut aut nulla. Porro explicabo ea est quidem consequatur odit. Voluptates voluptas facere sed quia dolores. Soluta dolorum cum necessitatibus nulla animi quia atque.

Dolore eaque voluptatum suscipit recusandae repellat ullam. Perspiciatis officiis sit nam voluptatem quae eligendi. Unde minus harum nulla repellat aliquid libero dolorem. Saepe ea occaecati consequatur maxime qui aspernatur. Consequatur quia cum soluta sit sed et voluptatem est. Non blanditiis quod eveniet dolorem omnis natus quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”