Is grade inflation at target schools really a thing?
So I'm a senior at a relatively good public university that is a non-target for anything finance-related and I was looking into average GPAs per department and at my school the Economics department curves to a 2.7 (B-). I was talking to my other buddies who go to target schools and they tell me their business/finance/economics related classes generally curve anywhere between a 3.0 - 3.5 on average (B to A- range).
If this is the case, does that make people who go to schools that curve lower even worse off (generally non-target schools)? Never have I seen anywhere on an application where I can input the average curve or anything so this is generally not even taken into account.
I guess a counter-argument is that since these top target schools have so many smart kids, the curve is higher too to match that and the harder classes in general. I don't know too much about this but I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts!
Target schools are harder tho, so it makes sense
non-target speaking
to some extent, yes, but over 90% of Harvard's 2004 class graduated with honors, which can presumably be meant as 3.5+ and that's an actual joke
Are we sure about this? Cause I've compared my curriculum in a non-target university in Europe and I have plenty of overlap in the material, the resources etc. And from what I know/have seen, there is also a tendency for kids to also purchase solved homeworks / have tutors for a lot of it.
Facts. Lower tier university grades are inflated because the classes are not as rigorous and there is less competition
False. The kids from ivy leagues who are known to grade inflate in my SA class were probably the dumbest kids in our class. The Non-Targets/Wharton-esque kids were the real performers.
I also go to school down the street from one of the top ivies, besides a network, there's not much more to gain with there degree versus mine.
Im sorry but I just find that hard to believe
Definitely disagree and you would have to be very smart to even get into Harvard compared to a random non-target
No they aren't. Education is so standardized throughout the United States that the course material is basically the same.
Definitely inflation, but like what you said, all your peers are incredibly intelligent so your competition is on another level
Yes and no; the better GPA does help people in undergraduate business schools (especially targets), but most recruiters know that the average GPAs in those programs should be higher as well. From my semitarget, you'll need around a 3.9 to be competitive in recruiting.
If you are doing econ at a HYP etc. or even a non-target that doesn't have a business program, you can get away with a lower GPA, but even here, higher is still better.
I think it is more dynamic than the target vs. nontarget debate, it really depends on what you're trying to do. If you're an econ major, they won't hold you to the same GPA standards that they hold a business major just because of how hard the programs are.
That said, you will need a higher GPA from a nontarget because you have to be at the top of your class, because the school is inevitably worse than the target.
a 3.9? that seems ridiculous for a target cutoff. Can you give a general idea of what type of school it is? I'm guessing brown/dartmouth, but could be like georgetown or notre dame or something too
U would need a 3.9 from brown/Dartmouth, even tho they have grade inflation??
Also, not a cutoff - the mean
I woulda been so fucked
Does your school's grading scale go above a 4.0? I know some schools like Cornell and Vanderbilt offer A+ grades that make the scale go up to 4.3, and MIT goes up to 5. Otherwise I can't believe you would need almost straight A's at a target
Business school outside of the NE - Think USC/UT/Indiana
Econ is considered hard now? oh boy
Lower tier university classes are easy and they have worse talent
Been to both types of schools. Tbh both might be still ‘hard’ (material wise) but if you switched the populations and both took either ones classes a class with 5-10% A’s would turn to like 70-80 for a target school and those top 5-10% A’s would turn to like 1-2% would get an A in the target school version of the class (this means out of 100 kid lecture, 1 person would be able to get an A in the target school class. Someone who might have attended this university on scholarship but competitive for target schools; however, still questionable).
Additionally, you have curves in both schools still lol. And the tests will quiz with a much higher capacity in target schools e.g. stupid questions that pull from one sentence in one slide vs doing their best to make the test straightforward at a nontarget (but still the subject might be tough, so it’s hard to judge unless you’ve sat in both environments).
TLDR not only are tests way easier the kids literally are in a different planet when it comes to work ethic, school smarts and habits, intelligence, etc. There is just such a small tangent of similarity. Also consider there are 10x the amount of students in non targets vs. small targets. This is if you control for major and class e.g. calculus at the community college vs MIT. But yeah even for those super tough majors like EE or CS it’s tough anywhere usually, and a kid from target school would have to still study and learn but the expectations are just so much lower.
Tldr as long as your original post
Didn't even realize it was a TLDR because it's so long and covers something totally different instead of summarizing previous paragraphs
And barely legible, wtf did I even write
Yes, grade inflation is big at HYP, you gotta be a dumbass or take the worst possible class combo to get below a 3.0
Do you go to one? If so, does that mean you need a higher GPA to standout among the crowd, or would you be fine with a 3.4 because fuck it it's yale/harvard. Apparently princeton is harder
Harvard it's piss easy heard something like 3.7 is the average; they are notorious for dishing out As. Princeton is the opposite - depending on the major you'd be looking at 3.0 average or even 2.8 for CBE majors. I imagine Yale will be somewhere in between but closer to Harvard.
Harvard released then quickly pulled data that the most commonly issued grade was an A Penn has A+'s that count as 4.3 I think Princeton inflates less
I had friends that went to Boston University, not a target per se; however, they used to complain about grade deflation. Apparently there was a maximum amount of 4.0's a course could give for that specific section. I don't know if anyone else can confirm that.
That happens at my school too
isnt that every school lol
Fmr BU student, grade deflation is terrible in some departments and just bad in others. Average is generally 2.9-3.1. Chem, bio and math depts are notorious deflators.
Current BU student here, Questrom (Business) and Engineering school have the highest grade deflation. I think there were few ranking were BU was ranked #1 for grade deflation. The administration thinks it makes it more “rigorous” and “challenging” and wants BU grade to mean something but it really doesn’t since it’s non target af
BU students love to complain but in reality their school is a joke. I transferred out with a 4.0 and know numerous successful alumni who graduated with 3.9+ GPAs. There’s a widespread victim mentality at the school, if a BU student complains about grade deflation to you just know they are not a high achiever.
Agreed, transferred out and the school I transferred to (not known for grade deflation) was multitudes more difficult
Victim mentality is widespread in Questrom, classes are easy as shit and students softer than baby shit...nowhere near as difficult--either in coursework, grading, or course hours--as, say, CAS Chem dept where there is a quota of F's to give out
ENG grade deflation isn't that bad, somewhere around a 2.8 - 2.9 avg but keep in mind it's not a top program so you're not competing against a bunch of geniuses
I went to Florida State and grade inflation and deflation occur. Our business school mandates a normal distribution for grades so you can either get bumped up or bumped down depending on how close you are to a grade letter classification on the bell curve. Example) I'd be sitting on a 92.9 about to get an A- and would be bumped down into a lower A- while someone else would be bumped into a higher A- from a B+.
I hate the US system of grading with letters. If you are a good student and have a 92.9 but the cutoff is a 93 for an A, you're getting lumped into a grade group with people who could have been on the lower side of the A- scale. IMO a pure number average is the best.
My high school used to do a system from 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest and just averaged your grade score over the difficulty of each class to weigh grades differently.
Using the exact number as a grade would create too much variability. Also, I dont agree with the idea of a weighted grade score based on difficulty. I had that back in HS, but it makes no sense in college when people in a university are in different schools, getting different degrees, and studying different majors
The "difficulty" weight was based off of hours of class a week. Harder classes were longer. For example, Algebra was lets say 6 hours a week vs Calculus of 9
Go to a state school and generally speaking classes are curved to a B-/B (2.7 - 3.0) median. I have personally had higher (A-) and lower (C) a few times but if you factor those in together it works out to the above. Grade deflation isn't a policy at my school, but I've had professors who ramp up the difficulty on the next exam to bring the averages down.
Yeah that'w how it is at FSU also. Some teachers will see that everyone is getting a good grade so they will hit you with an extremely hard exam to bring the entire class average down.
Just having this discussion about State Flagships especially in engineering. Easier to get into and hard as woodpecker lips to get out of. Flagship Econ and Finance professors have something to prove and purposefully make classes tougher. I have an Ivy League Econ type instructing Econ and the school has restrictions on A's, B+'s and B's. Like wise schools like G-Tech and your Technical schools like Rochester Poly can be like this as well.
People really think FSU classes are hard? Well, maybe they actually are for FSU students
I went to a “top 10 school,” whatever that even means aside from justifying tens of thousands on tuition per year. There was probably some grade inflation going on but that’s not the most worthwhile thing to note when it comes to recruitment.
We knew that we would need very high GPAs to stand a chance in the recruitment process. As a result, upperclassmen communicated this to underclassmen and a lot of kids took the easiest course load possible for freshman/sophomore year. I’m talking two years without many major-specific classes and deferring acceptance of any special (read: more difficult) academic programs or hard majors.
It’s not that hard to get a 3.95 when you’ve mostly taking general education courses.
Went to one of Dartmouth / Cornell / Brown / Duke and can confirm that finance recruiters care a lot about GPA and academic performance via oncampus recruiting. 3.8 will be hit or miss with ultra competitive places passing on you but a 3.9+ will pretty much guarantee you first rounds everywhere you apply.
I went to a semi-target (top LAC) and always thought my school had some problematic grade inflation. Then I took a graduate-level mathematics course about pricing derivatives at a state school nearby one year. That course was the easiest course I took in college, by a long shot. Other students complained that the material was too difficult so our exams were just homework problems we'd already seen, but with different numbers (don't ask me how a graduate math course required calculation). One midterm, the student seated next to me was clearly cheating - his blackberry was on his desk, screen on with what looked like solutions on it. It vibrated at one point and I shot him a nasty look, to which he whispered "sorry, bro". This course was so easy that I was legitimately concerned that there wouldn't be enough differentiation between students such that making a minor calculation mistake on an exam would be enough to drop me to an A-.
I'm not concerned about any grade inflation at my school.
B-school preschool
~from an econ major
As an econ major who went to a school with a top business program, I relate hardcore to this lol. B-school curve is a joke
Yeah I just switched out of an undergrad business school to a more liberal arts school, and the difference is pretty huge. The business school classes are so easy pretty much everyone gets a 90+ on every exam, so they have to curve down to a low 3 so everyone doesn't get 4.0. Taking econ classes this year, they curved the classes up to a 3.5, but man, did I have to work hard.
Non target competition is so bad it is a joke to get a good gpa
I transfered from a non-target to a target that curves to a 3.0 in the business school. The school I was at for my freshman year was a joke comparred to where I am now - the curve is definetly there to compensate for harder classes
I'm guessing Stern. Most other top b-schools have grade inflation.
not true lol
went to a non target, studied engineering. while competition wasn’t great (although def not nonexistent) the professors/curriculum/testing/everything were all total fucking garbage. certainly made things much harder
for context, the non target was Rutgers. lol
Went to a super non-target and our try hard professors are ALWAYS using curriculum from honors classes in harvard. ive been in 2 econ classes where ~70% of the students did NOT pass. hilarious. one of the professors was fired
lmao. They should've know you guys wouldnt be able to handle that. Tbf tho I went to W and we used cases from HBS, so sometimes may just be professors being lazy
Wharton is a joke.
Absolutely a real thing. Also real within schools, where undergrad business schools are curved to a higher grade than other colleges at the university.
This is not to say that targets are easier. Some just know that their standing will continue to be high if they take care of their students with good GPAs/placements.
Quidem voluptatem cum aut illum. Perferendis veritatis qui aut. Quidem dicta est itaque quae ea accusantium nesciunt. Et est natus iure nihil.
Distinctio aut recusandae ratione similique. Voluptatibus quaerat sit ducimus quas aut nihil. Reiciendis ut sapiente ut soluta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Excepturi consectetur magni quia et velit modi soluta. Nam laudantium voluptas dolor maiores nihil neque voluptatem. Et perspiciatis culpa dicta voluptas. Fugit in quam nemo eos esse ut nesciunt. Cumque placeat nostrum ut nihil facere.
Facilis placeat sit quis rerum. Eaque in dolor commodi reiciendis sint nam neque. Deleniti quam quod accusamus maiores dignissimos corporis saepe. Totam molestiae cupiditate rerum quo.
Eos et blanditiis doloribus beatae. Esse amet sequi eos optio. Eveniet aut alias autem saepe neque sed. Suscipit voluptas nostrum aut eum est. Deserunt aut fugit autem harum. Sint iusto repellendus iste voluptate harum dolorem. Sapiente dignissimos autem sit perspiciatis voluptatem fugit in.
Dolor qui aut eligendi ipsum quisquam consequuntur. Et est et sunt optio quos. Quod animi beatae dolore nam. Voluptatem repellendus delectus enim doloremque dolor. Est quis et earum consequuntur nemo incidunt. Adipisci quia quam hic dolores nobis quibusdam nostrum. Unde ex explicabo est saepe praesentium vero unde.
Dolores facere nisi facere ea iste et suscipit. Eius qui quasi perspiciatis modi.
Quidem molestiae provident corporis debitis assumenda. Quam ipsa voluptas in velit suscipit earum et. Facere aliquam inventore dignissimos est assumenda impedit ullam quae.
Quia aspernatur quia et accusantium a ipsum possimus. Placeat error porro sed qui eum voluptatibus. Sunt velit dolores ut rem quo commodi et.
Ut sequi et in qui eligendi in maxime nam. Debitis suscipit nihil quis aut error molestias quibusdam. Quia repellendus dicta accusamus nisi et soluta dolor. Soluta id ea quia pariatur aut debitis enim quos. Sit dignissimos doloremque ut repellendus aliquid.
Vero nihil molestiae ratione rem sed ipsam velit. Perspiciatis sit eum quis aut. Ut fuga et magnam expedita labore sint sit. Cumque alias asperiores omnis ratione omnis ratione. Iste id ducimus ratione sapiente. Ut molestias ab nisi inventore ipsa error.