JPM vs. CS offer decision

Hey all, I am lucky enough to have offers from both on the table. JPM is (most likely) with one of their “lesser” coverage groups and for CS I have a pretty good indication I’d get sponsors. I’m leaning slightly towards CS because I really want to do PE and like the group, but it’s really tough. Don’t want to reveal the exact JPM group because I don’t want to give away too much info. Would love any advice. Thanks in advance.

 

CS Sponsors is a top group. You should still get a great experience even though LBO activity has slowed. There could be a rebound by the time you hit the desk. Is this for SA or FT?

 
Most Helpful

CS sponsors in a heartbeat. The way that group is structured is unique to CS in that they do the execution. Very good group and would be hard to get experience like that at most other institutions. CS is known for being very aggressive in trying to get the best pricing for their clients in the lev fin world. 

 

It's basically sponsors or bust at CS, at least when compared to JPM. Also, CS isn't the only sponsors group that does the execution-- I know for a fact Barclays, BofA, and MS  do too. Not sure how OP has a "pretty good indication" that they'll get sponsors, it's the #1 group on almost everyone incoming SA's list. 

I wouldn't risk that and would go for JPM, especially for the PE exits. Sure you might have a good shot at MF PE exits from CS Sponsors, but the same candidate will make it there from JPM Sponsors (but also JPM M&A, HC, CRG...and so on). 

CS Sponsors is starting to get slightly overhyped (too much legacy association) these days, especially since they've dropped their place as the #1 FSG on the street. 

 

I think this and the comments below are fair. If you don’t know for a fact you’re getting sponsors, I’d go with JPM. That said, if you know your CS placement would be sponsors, I’ve seen that group work on some very interesting edge-of-the-market type deals and for someone set on PE it’d be a unique opportunity. I’d call analysts at both banks and ask them about what type of deals they’ve worked on. Try to get a feel for the culture beyond the positive marketing speak everyone uses with recruits. At the end of the day, future career success will be driven by being successful in your first role and getting to do meaningful work on interesting transactions. 

 

I have heard that getting into CS Sponsors is basically a shot in the dark and JPM would surely be the better brand name in general.

 

CS sponsors is a group a lot of interns are going to gun for. I’d go with jp. Most of their groups are top 3 in their respective industry or coverage.

 

As other people said, CS sponsors is a shot in the dark. What gives you indication that you will get it? Unless it's a very good chance, I would go with JPM since the majority of the groups there are good and not as top-heavy.

 

If OP is a frat/srat-star at UVA, then I can see the FSG thing being pretty likely.

 

haha seems more likely, but know a few from UVA that didn't get FSG. I would bet at least 80% of the incoming intern class puts FSG as their #1 or #2 choice. 

 
Funniest

I will pay you to take JPM. Let me know if you are interested

 

He better be paying you lol. What noob would take CS with the chance to be in sponsors over JPM. CS sponsors is way overhyped nowadays. Heard from a VP there that people are jumping ship.   

 

Can confirm this, if you want better prospects and a return offer go JPM, if you really want to go CS sponsors transfer for FT.  Also heard from a source that CS has already filled its sponsors team off the book, so unlikely you'll get that opp. 

 

I'm a second year analyst at CS. I don't know much about JPM, but I would definitely take JPM over CS. One of my roommates works at JPM and their candidates do well, but they hate it there. I'll give a rundown on CS though: 

- Sponsors is a great group, but M&A is better than Sponsors for MF exits. This has been true for at least the last few years. For the class of '18, M&A, TMT, and arguably GIG beat Sponsors in terms of placement. That was a particularly weak class for some reason, but highlights that it doesn't have consistent placement. Sponsors may have just taken a lot of weak candidates recently, but that highlights how it is more up to the candidate and less about the group.

- At CS, my personal belief and anecdotal evidence suggests that the best candidates get offers, and group has little to do with it (unlike, say, PJT RSSG or Goldman TMT where you can be a less than stellar candidate and probably get interviews / offers at top firms). Some anecdotal evidence: TMT this past year (class of '19) had arguably the best placement, followed by M&A, then Sponsors, then GIG / Healthcare. GIG / Healthcare had 1-2 analysts in each going to MFs (I heard GIG had an Apollo exit or two, not sure if true though).

- As a general rule, yearly M&A is the most consistent / best, followed by Sponsors, then TMT, then GIG, then Healthcare. I don't know much about Energy but I heard they do well. RE / FIG I know nothing, I think RE does OK and FIG not well, but someone else should fact check me. C&R does not do that well.

- Lastly for CS, as you can see above, the rankings tend to change year to year with the top 4 or 5 groups moving around a bit. The candidates I know going to MFs / UMMs from these groups were all individually strong, and I know people from non-Sponsors / M&A groups who were able to get MF offers because they were stellar candidates (great schools, personable, and knew finance well without being uninteresting) and not because of their group. Interviews are not a problem for people to get if you have a decent GPA / Undergrad / impress the headhunters / are in a coverage group. You may not get KKR and Blackstone and Apollo and Carlyle, but it would be pretty shocking if you were in a coverage group at CS and couldn't get an interview for at least one of these firms -- these places interview a lot of candidates. 

 

Exits come down to the candidate themselves a lot more than people realize. If you're at any mid/top BB you will get similar looks and just so happens to be that top talent concentrates in groups like GS TMT/MS M&A etc. but I would say it is the people in those groups rather than the group themselves. 

In regards to CS, M&A, Sponsors, TMT, REGAL, GIG Will put you in a good position to get quality looks. I would stay away from other groups.

 

Agreed. REGAL recruits separately, FYI. If you're an absolute stud at CS v. some idiot at MS M&A you'll get a better offer, but by self-selection and reputation the best candidates tend to be at MS M&A. PE firms don't really care what bank or firm you're at once you're at a certain threshold -- there are certain indicators (like historically TPG growth liked MS Sponsors, and so asos at TPG growth could call and find out who was good at MS Sponsors etc.) and headhunters play a role, but beyond that it really is the candidate (which includes GPA / undergrad, how "chill" or "likable" you are depending on the culture of each firm, ability to talk about deals, LBO test, etc.)

 

what sort of deals are Sponsor bankers working on with no LBOs happening at the moment? 

 

Nesciunt similique doloremque earum provident qui eos. Cumque repellat et sit voluptates. Recusandae sed provident dolorem temporibus. Pariatur sapiente laudantium et quia qui provident consequuntur. Itaque amet eos tenetur quia excepturi veritatis. Ratione nostrum qui et culpa ad. Quae ad unde dolorem harum ut.

 

Iusto dolor cum occaecati ut veniam. Doloribus eum inventore et officiis esse error similique explicabo. Nihil reprehenderit nisi qui in reprehenderit eos voluptatibus velit.

Illo sunt reprehenderit reprehenderit libero explicabo numquam et quas. Possimus rem nihil eos ex quod. Laboriosam nam est ex omnis ut doloribus accusantium placeat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”