NYC Man Pays 102% Tax Rate

I'm preempting Bonus Bananas today to bring you guys this story so you'll have a little something to feel good about going into the weekend. I know most of us hate paying taxes and think we pay way too much, especially in New York. But I promise you this guy has you beat, and the ironic thing is that he didn't even know it.

Mitt Romney took some heat over only paying an effective 13.9% tax rate. So much so, that he took it upon himself to start claiming he actually paid a 50% tax rate, a claim so risible that it actually set a new high-water mark in the world of bullshit, which is no mean feat when you're a politician.

It was when I was running down that story that I discovered James Ross, a 58-year old PE guy from New York who paid an astounding 102% tax rate last year and didn't even realize it until he penciled it out.


“I had no idea I was paying such a high rate,” he told me when we spoke this week. “I had trouble believing this was possible. I called my accountant, and I said, ‘Do you realize I’m paying every penny I have in taxable income? I’m dipping into savings to pay my income tax.’ He said, ‘It’s unfortunate, but at your income level’ ” — with high earned income and large itemized deductions that Mr. Ross can’t take advantage of — “ ‘that’s just the way it is.’ ”

Turns out that his high level of income (but not quite high enough) puts him in a taxation "not-so-sweet" spot where he pays more in taxes than both those who make less than he and those who make more. He is literally paying every penny he makes in taxes, and then going into his savings to pay what that doesn't cover.

Ross makes over $1 million a year - the level at which New York disallows any itemized deductions. The only deduction he was allowed to take was for 50% of his charitable contributions, and to his credit he gave a generous 11% of his earnings to charity. All the city and state taxes force him into an A.M.T. nightmare with the feds, further exacerbating his tax woes.

So the next time you think you have it bad, imagine making zero dollars in income and having to cut a check from your savings to the government just for the privilege of drawing air in New York City.

And James, if you're reading this, call Mitt Romney ASAP. You need to hire his tax guy.

Have a great weekend guys.

 

vomits

This is unreal.

"When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is." - Oscar Wilde "Seriously, psychology is for those with two x chromosomes." - RagnarDanneskjold
 

Yeah, I doubt that he is paying his entire income to the government. With that said, NYC and NY State taxes are pretty high and then you factor in top Federal tax bracket with not deductions. I\'d say his total amount paid in taxes is over 50%.

 

It\'s possible to pay more then you make. I\'m guessing he had one time over deprecation payments. One annoying part of acclerated deprecation.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 
heister:
It\\'s possible to pay more then you make. I\\'m guessing he had one time over deprecation payments. One annoying part of acclerated deprecation.

Is it even possible to depreciate personal assets?

 
Bernankey:
heister:
It\\\\'s possible to pay more then you make. I\\\\'m guessing he had one time over deprecation payments. One annoying part of acclerated deprecation.

Is it even possible to depreciate personal assets?

He is in PE, his percentage of business owned assets can be depreciated I believe.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

This is pretty much what happened. Let's say he made $100 million. From this he had 80% or $80m in deductions making his taxable income $20m. He ended up paying 20.40m in taxes. So he actually ended up only paying around 20% on his total income for the year.

The original article is misleading. This article is misleading because the journalist doesn't know shit about accoutnting, but if you read through it they'll quietly say he actually really paid 20% (paragraph 10).

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/102-tax-rate-takes-cake-160010322.html

 

[quote=McMonkey]This is pretty much what happened. Let's say he made $100 million. From this he had 80% or $80m in deductions making his taxable income $20m. He ended up paying 20.40m in taxes. So he actually ended up only paying around 20% on his total income for the year.

The original article is misleading. This article is misleading because the journalist doesn't know shit about accoutnting, but if you read through it they'll quietly say he actually really paid 20% (paragraph 10).

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/102-tax-rate-takes-cake-160010322.html[/q…] Yup that explains it. So misleading. That's like me saying "On my salary of 100K, if I were allowed to deduct 80K worth of expenses in the year, I would be paying 150% tax on my taxable income"

-MBP
 

[quote=McMonkey]This is pretty much what happened. Let's say he made $100 million. From this he had 80% or $80m in deductions making his taxable income $20m. He ended up paying 20.40m in taxes. So he actually ended up only paying around 20% on his total income for the year.

The original article is misleading. This article is misleading because the journalist doesn't know shit about accoutnting, but if you read through it they'll quietly say he actually really paid 20% (paragraph 10).

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/102-tax-rate-takes-cake-160010322.html[/q…]

How the hell are taxes calculated?

Total Income - Qualified Deductions = Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) - Deductions / Exemptions (Schedule A) = Taxable Income - Tax Credits (Charitable Contributions, etc..)

So it seems like the $1MM salary only limited the Tax Credits he could receive and nothing to do with Qualified or Schedule A Deductions. Therefore, McMonkey is correct. Then again I didn't do so hot in Individual Tax Accounting. Boggles my mind how people can do that for a living and not want to throw their dogs off their own roof.

 
Best Response
ProspectiveMonkey][quote=McMonkey:
This is pretty much what happened. Let's say he made $100 million. From this he had 80% or $80m in deductions making his taxable income $20m. He ended up paying 20.40m in taxes. So he actually ended up only paying around 20% on his total income for the year.

The original article is misleading. This article is misleading because the journalist doesn't know shit about accoutnting, but if you read through it they'll quietly say he actually really paid 20% (paragraph 10).

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/102-tax-rate-takes-cake-160010322.html[/q…]

How the hell are taxes calculated?

Total Income - Qualified Deductions = Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) - Deductions / Exemptions (Schedule A) = Taxable Income - Tax Credits (Charitable Contributions, etc..)

So it seems like the $1MM salary only limited the Tax Credits he could receive and nothing to do with Qualified or Schedule A Deductions. Therefore, McMonkey is correct. Then again I didn't do so hot in Individual Tax Accounting. Boggles my mind how people can do that for a living and not want to throw their dogs off their own roof.

Heh. I did a tax internship in my sophomore year of college. Wanted to toss myself out the window.

Never again.

 

Aspernatur magnam eaque ex voluptas. Veniam aperiam eaque laborum expedita optio. Rem quam tenetur iusto magnam eum aut et. Deleniti rem perspiciatis asperiores quidem iusto dolor saepe. Sed voluptas eos voluptas sint dicta ut itaque.

My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 

Sunt accusantium ut sit. In quis illo mollitia. Non occaecati ducimus quaerat.

Ratione ipsam qui reprehenderit eius id. Ipsam quis omnis minus deserunt mollitia. Aut sed porro nulla.

Voluptatibus non ut ad laborum sapiente inventore. Optio quidem explicabo deleniti repellendus saepe. Animi voluptatem amet illum ad. A laboriosam ea totam omnis dolores sint.

Eos nostrum hic autem. Distinctio quos minima quo magnam quam iure possimus. Maiores ut voluptatibus nihil optio porro. Molestiae et rem dolor.

I think that we are all clinging to a great many piano tops...

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”