Best Response

Im so sick of the prestige thing around here, its quite ridiculous and childish. I came to this site from M&I which seems to take a more logical approach to banking careers, this site seems to be full of geeky ass ivy schoolers who cant get girls so instead of ranking hot chicks they are obsessed with minuscule differences between banks and their perceived prestige.

You know whats prestigious? Getting a fucking job.

We've got half a million shares in the bag!
 

it's a silly topic, really... all those firms are at the top and if anyone ever had the choice to choose between them (which has probably happened 1-2 times in the history of mankind) then it would be merely a matter of personal preference. Also, H&F and Warburg Pincus and a few others are roughly on level with those in terms of prestige.

 
chanmonkey98:
It's true that these firms shouldn't be ranked, but what do you guys think are these firms' relative strengths/areas of uniqueness?

See, THAT is actually a good useful question.

We've got half a million shares in the bag!
 

Blackstone - like exclusivity. avoid bidding wars KKR - will play in auctions Carlyle - especially strong in industrials and C&R TPG - turnarounds and operations, not afraid to bid high Bain - definitely not afraid to bid high.. dumb money

all will opportunistically tap the debt markets to extract dividends/achieve cost savings.

 
DJ Long Straddle:
zsurf nailed it.

If you dip lower, then you get CVC (actually could be considered with the other shops noted), Hellman & Friedman, and Advent.

I actually would put H&F at top tier with KKR and BX, etc... they are smaller (as a lot of PE firms should be to keep returns higher), but those guys dominate. Check out there returns on the Calpers website... that's really all that you need to do to realize the sickness.

 
oneortheother:
Why is Bain Cap dumb money? I thought they were known to have the most "pedigreed" employees (at least judging from the website)

1- "not afraid to bid high, dumb money" doesn't equate to the professionals at a particular firm literally being stupid

2- even if it did, why would Bain being known to hire pedigreed professionals somehow negate that?

 
oneortheother:
Why is Bain Cap dumb money? I thought they were known to have the most "pedigreed" employees (at least judging from the website)

So you equate pedigree with performance in the business world? If you ever start a PE/HF, please let us know. I will be sure to bet against that.

It would be funny if a young PTJ/Soros' profile was posted on this site. I bet they would be pooh-poohed for their lack of pedigree (futures broker and a stockbroker at a small firm). Here is the thing: If you want to be like Soros/PTJ/Kravis you don't chase pedigree. You chase excellence in your profession. Kravis left a really "prestigious" position at an investment bank to start a small buyout shop. Would you have the balls/foresight to do that? Ask yourself that when you dream of making it big.

 
oneortheother:
Why is Bain Cap dumb money? I thought they were known to have the most "pedigreed" employees (at least judging from the website)

because they've never seen a business they don't like. they bid on everything

 
DJ Long Straddle:
Good point int. pymp...my comment was along the lines of fund size, but either way they are nasty.

yeah... they're smaller. But I consider "top" to include a combination of AUM, performance, resumes of the professionals, etc.... and in those other categories H&F dominates.

 
acs_london:
If you're really looking to rank PE you should do it by total funds raised and funds on-hand to invest for the current year.

Thats the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You might as well rank them based on the average age of the senior partners. How about you don't rank them at all, unless you have a very specific context, which would make the rankings meaningful.... i.e. "what are the best known middle market PE firm that does large deals?" "what are the largest PE firms?" etc...

 
Marcus_Halberstram:
acs_london:
If you're really looking to rank PE you should do it by total funds raised and funds on-hand to invest for the current year.

Thats the dumbest thing I've ever heard. ...

I work part-time in wealth management. Those are some of the metrics we use to rank PE funds in order of importance to target their partners.

 
Marcus_Halberstram:
acs_london:
If you're really looking to rank PE you should do it by total funds raised and funds on-hand to invest for the current year.

Thats the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You might as well rank them based on the average age of the senior partners. How about you don't rank them at all, unless you have a very specific context, which would make the rankings meaningful.... i.e. "what are the best known middle market PE firm that does large deals?" "what are the largest PE firms?" etc...

fund size alone shouldnt be a decisive factor but the guy however has a point. the megafunds (KKR,BX,tpg...) that people on WSO salivate about, happen to have the largest funds (AUM) / dry powder.

 

bankers almost certainly rank by likelihood to play in auctions and utilize traditional debt financing. ranking depends on perspective. from a banker's perspective, the top buyout firms are those that consistently access the capital markets.

 

As I see it:

1- bankers care about how much dry powder you have to invest and to a lesser degree they care about which of your investments are ripe for an exit (incumbent banks i.e. those that participated in the LBO, typically lead these anyway, so no one is too concerned with this, since if you're an incumbent, the exit business will come to you, and if you're not, well then you're not very likely to get to participate). Actually, they also care about brand as they want to be seen doing deals with top tier PE sponsors.

2- I don't really care why or what wealth managers care about, but common sense implies they have a set piece of capital to invest in the PE asset class and they want to spread it wide and thin across top performers with an obvious longevity (i.e. SAC over new ex-Goldman trader's garage head fund)

3- as an analyst/associate, I personally would be most concerned with what types of doors a PE gig will open for me in the future and what I will learn on the job... both of which are pretty closely related... although as I see it, the brand name will open doors more doors, while what you learned and how intelligently you can talk about it will keep you there.

 

would add a top niche player category to the list. also fast growing, top returning funds are likely to be better careers long term. you want to join the next KKR not be employee #500 at KKR.

Would add Marlin Equity Partners to the list of top niche / up and coming PE shops. they invest mostly in software/tech but also in services, industrials, consumer. Think of cross between Vista and Gores (several ex heads of Gores are at Marlin now). Understand Marlin has tier 1 returns and is growing very fast which is a major positive (look at AUM trajectory of last 5 funds). They also have a flexible mandate so they compete against top growth equity funds, midmarket funds, turnaround funds depending on the type of deal, but they are also competing against the big names e.g. Advent, KKR in the upper mid market. Will be interesting to see what happens - the next fund could be $3bn-$5bn if they continue to perform as historically. Based on their website, they're also attracting ex bankers from top firms/schools e.g. wharton, yale, / GS, MS, HL, etc. They also have a highly operational focus like Vista.

 

Jesus you're an idiot. Good luck getting a position at any of the firms you mentioned - if you're lucky enough to have a choice between the two (probably

- Capt K - "Prestige is like a powerful magnet that warps even your beliefs about what you enjoy. If you want to make ambitious people waste their time on errands, bait the hook with prestige." - Paul Graham
 

Can only tell you what I know from being on the other side of the table, but Berkshire is very detail oriented in their diligence. They will go all out and really ask a lot of prying questions, but not in a bad way. They are respected as very intelligent and a top name in the middle market. Additionally, based on the interactions I've had with some of their mid tier guys (principal level), they are actually a good bunch (as opposed to jerks). Warning though: My sample size is relatively small. If you're interested in Boston, definitely put them at the top of your list.

~~~~~~~~~~~ CompBanker

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Madison Dearborn, GTCR, New Mountain Capital, Berkshire Partners, and Golden Gate Capital are generally considered to be the top mid-market PE firms. Silver Lake has a mid-market PE arm that specializes in technology (SL Sumeru).

 

i think 99% of the world would be ecstatic to make 100K+ a year as a 21 year old. wallstreetoasis' elitism and high school kids are really turning this forum from something helpful to just a douchier 4chan

 

@philliesphan, agree with you in spirit

but highly doubt 99% of the population is delusional enough to essentially sacrifice the best years of their life for any amount of money. You know those people who really don't care about money and just do what they love? They live much wealthier lives than any banker I know.

 
ibhopeful532:
@philliesphan, agree with you in spirit

but highly doubt 99% of the population is delusional enough to essentially sacrifice the best years of their life for any amount of money. You know those people who really don't care about money and just do what they love? They live much wealthier lives than any banker I know.

Haha, are you not from America? Have you never seen reality TV shows? Look at the shit people do for fortune and fame. Jersey Shore, Swan, Bachelor/Bachelorette, etc. People are willing to embarrass themselves in the age of the internet (where things are rarely forgotten and never buried forever) despite any of the potentially negative side effects, just to make some money.

I get your point that not everyone is obsessed with money but in reality that isn't the only reason people get into high finance...sometimes its about the possible freedom you gain from the sacrifices you make. I know plenty of people who would turn their nose at a job that forced you to work 100+ hours a week but I know very very few who would turn down $100k+. Although many people in finance, especially those college students who are aspiring bankers, are attracted to the money they typically stay because of their motivation to succeed and do something that many others aren't capable of (not necessarily just don't want to do).

Regards

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
 

I would say a good ranking now (2020) would be:

  1. Blackstone
  2. KKR
  3. Carlyle
  4. Apollo
  5. Bain Capital
  6. Warburg Pincus
  7. TPG

  8. Hellman&Friedman

  9. Advent
  10. Apax
  11. CVC
  12. General Atlantic

  13. Oaktree

  14. Centerbridge
  15. EQT
  16. Permira

This is of course only my impression in terms of perceived prestige in London. If you do not agree, that is understandable, and if you could contribute that would be amazing!

 

Can we leave this for the ib undergrads? Makes very little sense full stop

 

Et tempore non in assumenda sed. Ullam quisquam et velit ut. Accusamus placeat sunt dolor sed veritatis aliquam quisquam.

Pariatur pariatur maiores id doloremque non sint facere. Corporis quos neque occaecati laboriosam facere ullam officia.

Vel occaecati animi delectus in provident exercitationem. A magnam qui voluptate quam. Deserunt quia dolor aut velit occaecati voluptatibus et.

 

Velit nulla dignissimos qui est totam. Quia voluptatem animi omnis pariatur aut. Qui omnis sit aperiam quo nam. Aut qui cumque exercitationem repellendus eveniet ad ut.

Qui dolores est rerum enim non. Hic eum aspernatur est sint ab inventore repellendus. Reprehenderit repellat voluptates aliquam dolor voluptas magnam optio. Sit illo sed deserunt molestias dolorum et et alias. Doloribus nam voluptatem sed ut ex.

Quos sit modi eaque quod aut. Vel aliquam corrupti a. Temporibus aut sunt excepturi est.

 

Id sed dolore quod est explicabo. Dolorum et enim consequuntur nihil et assumenda. Aut architecto perspiciatis omnis dignissimos voluptate. Earum harum alias molestiae repellat. Perferendis voluptatem sit et aut dolorem ducimus laboriosam pariatur. Et deleniti nihil dolore sit excepturi dolorem numquam.

Sunt voluptas eveniet rerum voluptatum vero dolor. Eveniet et porro suscipit eius soluta aut. Unde eligendi dolores maxime voluptates et. Fuga officiis facilis libero consequuntur beatae voluptatibus atque veritatis. Et iusto tempora quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”