If you are anything like me, you know the direction you want your career to go, and you're trying to figure out the best way to get there. You may not have the direct work experience you need, so you're in search of a program that can bridge the gap that will lead to the job you want.

In my case I work in risk management for a consulting company and I want to transition my career into trading / risk management in the energy industry (I know, bad timing to make the switch right!).

In my search for ways to bridge this gap on my resume, I came across the Energy Risk Professional Program (ERP). I enrolled, studied, wrote the exam (twice), and obtained my ERP certification.

When I began looking to enroll in this program, the first thing I noticed was information about it was hard to come by. Here are 5 things I wish I knew about the ERP program before signing up.

The ERP Designation is recognized more by Electricity Companies

Although the ERP Program covers topics applying to all parts of the energy industry, including electricity and O&G, in my job search, I am finding that the ERP program is fairly well known with electricity companies, but less so with O&G companies.

The Exam was More Difficult than I Expected

If you don't already work in the energy industry, don't underestimate this exam. As mentioned, I did have to write it twice! It involved over 400 hours of study time, hundreds of pages of notes and probably the same amount of cups of coffee. Take it from me, this is an exam you cannot just cram for!

The Program has More Breadth Than Depth

As I am new to the energy industry, this program was perfect for me as it covers the entire energy value chain. It covers physical energy commodities (oil, gas, and coal) and electricity markets, as well as covering financial energy products and risk management.

I am now able to talk confidently about physical and financial energy markets; however, as difficult as the exam is, this program is a starting point. It gives you the framework for understanding the energy value chain, but may not have the depth of knowledge that some may hope for. That being said, the program does provide you with tools and additional material to develop your depth of knowledge over time.

Apply Your Knowledge; Don't Just Memorize!

This program includes online practice exams to help you prepare. But be aware, the practice questions are simplified versions of the actual exam questions. I was getting 90% and up on the practice exams, but when it came to the actual exam, I didn't pass the first time.

Memorizing how to complete these practice exam questions will only get you so far. The actual exam questions have an added complexity which the practice questions do not. You can be assured, the exam will separate those who truly understand the subject matter and how to apply it from those who memorized how to answer a particular style of question.

Importance of the learning objectives

Now this may seem like an obvious one, but the learning objectives are truly what you should be focusing on!

The exam covers a lot of topics and there is a lot to read and prepare for. It can be very overwhelming. Many of the readings have additional information that you don't need for the exam (although great to know!). Read the additional information, but always refer back to the learning objectives for what to study.

Comments (14)

  1. Where are you based?
  2. How is the ERP/GARP network in your region?
Learn More

Side-by-side comparison of top modeling training courses + exclusive discount through WSO here.


I'm based in Calgary, Canada and the ERP/GARP network seems to be growing strong in my region. A regional chapter was formed just over a year ago and I think this has fueled more interest in the program.

Here is a link to the various chapters if you're interested: http://www.garp.org/#!/chapters/


I think your comments add a lot of value to this post. Thank you!

I'm glad you brought up the math requirements of the program because I was surprised with the level of math in the exam. It had been a few years since I had taken a math course so it took some extra time to learn the financially traded energy products section of the program.

To answer your questions:

  1. I found the time constraint a little difficult, but it seemed like some people were able to leave the exam early (good or bad?). It was the calculation problems that ate up all the time for me. The first time I wrote the exam I spent far too much time on questions I didn't know how to solve. When I wrote the exam the second time I was quick to star any questions I was struggling with and came back to them after. When I went back to the difficult questions, I was more relaxed and I was able to solve a few of them. I found this helped a lot.
  2. Since there aren't a lot of practice questions I took the learning objectives and used them as questions to answer.
  3. The first time was a bit of a surprise and I went into the exam not knowing what to expect. The second time I prepared for the exam I focused only on the learning objectives. I skimmed the readings and looked for the answers to the learning objectives instead of taking notes on the entire reading. I also broke the learning objectives into different categories. First, I highlighted any learning objective that had the word "Calculate" in it. This is where I struggled on the first exam. Second, I went through to see what lists I could learn by highlighting any "compare and contrast" learning objective. An example of this is "compare and contrast the eight key mechanisms for pricing natural gas...". I rewrote these lists over and over again until I knew them well. I found by going through these two types of learning objectives first, I was able to answer the "explain" and "understand" type learning objectives quite easily after.

Let me know if you have any other questions. I'd be happy to try to answer them.



It will be interesting to see if the pass rate increases when the exam is split into two parts, because right now when you're nearing the end of the 8 hour exam it's easy to make simple mistakes.

To answer your questions:
1. The proctors allowed water in clear bottles to be under your chair. Everything else had to be at the front of the room. I think it's also good to mention that the proctors were flexible with leaving to go to the washroom. You just have to raise your hand and the proctor will hold your exam when you leave, and will return it to you when you get back.

  1. Overall I think the ERP was worth it for me, I would do it again, and I recommend it to others. I gained a lot of confidence talking on a broad range of energy topics and improved my quantitative skills. This along with the network you gain access to with the local GARP chapters is great!

Let me know if you have any other questions and good luck on the exam!

"sittingpenguin" wrote:


p>As someone who is writing the exam this month I have a few comments and questions

How'd the exam go?

Can you provide us with some valuable insights?


I am a recent university grad student (economics and finance; and environmental studies) as well. I am interested in a career involving research, analysis, and/or risk management in the energy sector. Would you recommend pursuing ERP or FRM?? I cannot decide between the two... Considering that FRM is a more recognized designation, which i think broadens the career choices (helpful, in case of the lack of jobs in energy industry) but would still be relevant and useful if to apply for jobs in the energy sector?


Good morning, I'm in the same boat as you ... I was wondering what you ended up finding out.

  1. Any relevance to Procurement / supply Chain management in O/G ??

My situation is similar to alena113's where I am a recent grad with Economics and Finance. However, I'm currently employed as a sell-side research analyst with a focus on O&G. I've been debating between the ERP and FRM.... I'm having a hard time deciding between the two. Consider doing the ERP for work ( 95% of my peers are engineers or goe's and I was hoping the ERP would give me technical skills I lack) while pursuing the FRM to broadening my long-term career choices. So I was wondering if anyone had both? If so which did they like more? Or just why you chose to go with one over the other?


1-Click to Unlock All Comments - 100% FREE

Why do I need to be signed in?
WSO is a knowledge-sharing community that depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something.
+ Bonus: 6 Free Financial Modeling Lessons with 1-Click Signup ($199 value)