9/10 Startups Fail?

I just got done watching Start-Up Junkies on HULU. Pretty cool documentary and does a great job of showing how the start-up process works. At the beginning of the show they reiterate the old stat that 9/10 start-ups fail. I call BS. http://smallbusinessplanned.com/information/small…

So my question to those in VC, what has been the failure rate from your experience?

 

I could actually believe it. My team invests in 1%-2% of all the deals we see. I think the numbers are very different for failure rates of start ups over all and failure rate for start ups with VC investors. I would expect the later to be a lower fail rate.

"If you want to succeed in this life, you need to understand that duty comes before rights and that responsibility precedes opportunity."
 
Schumpeter:
You can see the failure rate of each Y Combinator batch of startups here: http://www.techgox.com/accelerators/Y-Combinator/details?sort=-failrate

It's not 9/10, but it's still fairly high (considering the fact that YC would be one of the most reputable startup incubators).

If you include all the projects that fail to get any funding or support, then that 9/10 figure is quite possible...

Looks like between 2006 and 2010 only 28% of those YC startups have failed, based on whatever YC's definition of failure is (Thats an important detail I don't have any information on)

 
Rule of thumb I've heard from the VC perspective is 5-7 companies return less than the original investment (liquidation value), 2-3 return ~1-3x and 1-2 are home runs (~10x+). Your fund return really depends on the home runs.

That's the general rule I've heard most VCs work by

 

One additional note - I have witnessed a lot of startups fail because of founding partners being handicapped by each other. When you first start a business with someone, it's always happy go lucky, but add a year or two into operations, pressing financial situations, bf/gf issues and all of the sudden everyone can have their own agenda. Things can spiral downwards very quickly, especially if at the time of incorporation you issued 50/50 equity.

 
Best Response

It really depends on the stage. If you look at early-stage seed funding, there's a lot of fluff and one-man companies that die in the egg quickly (especially in tech, with all the Zuck wannabes). Do you count all of these? Do you count getting the company registered as part of the startups? Do you count companies only after seed funding from savings, friends & family? Or after funding from an actual fund? Your numerator and denominator can greatly change by considering these questions. 9/10 sounds dramatic, but probably right if you look before institutional seed funding. If you go later-stage, odds improve dramatically. My fund does later-stage healthcare deals where the device, compound or service has been de-risked (approved/cleared by regulatory authorities) and that the company is about to launch. There, we take market risk. At that point, the failure rate is under 30-40%.

Aei ho theos geōmetreî
 

It really depends on you as an investor.

There are people who invest a little into a lot of companies. And there are investors who invest a lot into a little bit of companies. It is all about the risk you're willing to assume. Obviously, when you fund your own vc firm, you can do whatever you want. The problem that many VCs face are dealing with other partners and their own board. They don't want the money to just sit.

Every firm differs when it comes to success/failure rate. You can't really expect to hit home runs really. They just happen. The gods bless the world with some super genius who just happens to see the world differently. And if that person decides to capitalize off of the world, then you might hit a home run. But in all honesty, you could easily go years without finding that google, yahoo, facebook, hotmail.

The ideal situation is to start as an entrepreneur, exit a company, and start your own fund with your own money.

It is not about the title that you have, it is about how much money that you have.
 

Est vel pariatur sint occaecati corporis eius tempora. Sunt et laudantium amet laborum. Quas debitis reiciendis odio iure magni. Qui et magni blanditiis molestias explicabo. Maxime quia amet hic maiores. Culpa ab perferendis corrupti est aut. Itaque ab praesentium repudiandae et vel eveniet aliquid nostrum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”