Craziest comp stories - downside

Since there has been so many threads of big payouts at Hedge funds, would love to hear any stories of the inverse - where analysts or even partners/PMs put on very profitable trades and were really underpaid at YE. Helps frame the reality of the industry

Hedge Fund Interview Course

  • 814 questions across 165 hedge funds. Crowdsourced from over 500,000 members.
  • 11 Detailed Sample Pitches and 10+ hours of video.
  • Trusted by over 1,000 aspiring hedge fund professionals just like you.

Comments (22)

  • Investment Analyst in HF - EquityHedge
May 1, 2021 - 3:33pm

Why dont we not talk about +2 or -2 std deviation events and just talk about EV(X) for a role and how to maximize that?

May 1, 2021 - 3:55pm

Let's say the role is analyst @ $5bn+ HF (top non-tiger cubs, so maybe Whale Rock, Abdiel, Light Street, Altimeter, Eminence, Holocene, Melvin etc) at age 26, and you become a PM when you're 32 -- would EV look something along the lines of this?

Analyst years: $250k (in "eh" year) -  $2m (in blockbuster year) --> a few $300-500k years with the occasional low 7 figure year

PM/Partner years: $1m (in "eh" year) - $10m+ (in blockbuster year) --> $2-3m a year with the occasional high 7/low 8 figure year

Play the game until you're 40 or so, and you could be worth $15-30m. That's a hell of a career imo. Maybe you had like 4 blockbuster/outlier years total over your time at the fund (2 as an analyst, 2 as a PM). How max(EV)? Invest your earnings in the fund and perform :) At places like Light Street, Abdiel, and Melvin (with the exception of 2021 for Melvin lmao), they seem to have blockbuster years all the time so that could also make a huge difference

Learn More

300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.

Learn more
  • Anonymous Monkey's picture
  • Anonymous Monkey
  • Rank: Chimp
May 2, 2021 - 4:28pm

Crazy comp story on the downside might just be a person getting fired and/or sued by their employer for money that the employer claims the employee owns them. I think I heard a story of an employee being let go / terminated by one of the major PE/HF/buyside firms and then that employer suing the now former employee for damages or to stop them from working again in the industry for a while

  • Analyst 3+ in HF - Other
May 2, 2021 - 7:32pm

I worked at a hedge fund and my target compensation was 200 base + 200 expected bonus. I received zero bonus for two years in a row. But don't worry boss said to focus on the long term. 

  • PM in HF - Other
May 2, 2021 - 11:05pm

Know a guy joined a firm was told 3% could happen if desk made like 50mm as an exaggerated example. They made 2-3x that # and was paid 50% above his guarantee. 
 

I think the last 3 years the trend I have seen firms want to give better salaries to analysts/jr staff to prepare them to be shafted later. 

May 3, 2021 - 12:08am

It's possible for analysts to be fired near the end of the year and get zero bonus due to that, even if the fund performance was decent. A few firms seem to be notorious for it.

May 3, 2021 - 10:39pm

It's much easier to give someone a low bonus and have them quit than deal with firing them.  Says more about the analyst than the firm - they aren't doing this with people they actually care to retain.

May 4, 2021 - 10:46am

It's actually somewhat common in SM quant funds. These funds can be run like big corporations and plan their annual layoffs near the end of the year, so it's convenient for the managers to get rid of people at that point.

  • Investment Manager in HF - Other
May 4, 2021 - 10:54am

Not sure if you have experience with this, but as someone who has had to let people go (with and without cause) I can tell you it isn't an "easy" thing to do (you should ask you legal dept). The risk firms run by firing people before their bonus pay is much higher than giving a low bonus to poor performers, and if the person isn't a poor performer and you are firing them to avoid paying bonuses, good luck. You open yourself up to reputational risk and legal risk. As much as people on this site like to say "at will employment" or "your employer will f you over the first chance they get", it isn't like that in the "real" world. It is much more complicated. 

May 4, 2021 - 11:07am

That has not been my experience, or that of several others I know (and this forum and Glassdoor have many accounts of it too at various firms). It may be more of a quant thing. People are technically not fired but their job is eliminated, with a severance that is much less than their bonus would have been. In fact, some firms plan an annual layoff round near the end of the year for just this purpose, and they may create a new job the next year and hire someone else. This is common in many big corporations outside finance as well.

Most Helpful
  • Investment Manager in HF - Other
May 4, 2021 - 11:33am

I don't mean this to be insulting, but if that is happening that is usually a sign of bad performance of the analyst as opposed to some "bulk firing" that firms do every year. There are a few reasons I say this:

1) reputation - it becomes a lot harder to hire "good" employees if you are churning through many people each year AND screwing them over. Many funds have high turnover, and I understand that people are biased to think that even if others failed you'll crush it so you take the job, but if you see people not getting bonuses, that changes the story. 

2) legal exposure - it becomes pretty hard as a firm to defend "eliminating" jobs every year and then rehiring for the same role and screwing people on bonuses. The closer you are to bonus period, the more likely firms are to cover this. You should ask your friends who have gone through this whether they got any bonus covered  

3) retention and development - it is much harder to retain talent if you are a firm that constantly screws people over. Believe it or not, the "junior" employees are not where you are getting a lot of value, most employees (even quants) are negative ROI for a while, and the more senior people have serious protections against getting "fired" (or job being eliminated). So by firing a bunch of people, senior people may want to leave (concerned firm isn't run well) and hiring new talent becomes tough. 

Anyway, I'm not saying you didn't have a bad experience (or bad luck). But I think you are generalizing a bit too much. I'm not sure how long you've been in the industry and with which firms, but I've seen many of the top firms (including quant firms) including working in the industry, having senior employees as friends, etc and I don't see this in the places I know. 

  • Quant in HF - EquityHedge
May 13, 2021 - 9:39am

Fugiat totam voluptatem dolor fugiat nemo voluptatibus architecto. Blanditiis commodi minus sequi dolor eius cupiditate et. Quidem ipsam non aliquid rerum. Molestias quasi et velit ut id.

Iure amet nam officiis ratione mollitia consequatur ullam. Voluptatibus porro est qui ex. Et dicta sunt eum officia.

Recusandae voluptates consectetur molestias iure alias suscipit cumque. Voluptas qui ut quia sed explicabo aspernatur. Laboriosam labore quo similique necessitatibus odio blanditiis.

Dolores et aliquid eligendi qui in ut. Ullam odio odio quia. Dolores iusto possimus quidem qui cum atque in. Molestiae animi dolorem quo illum eum.

Start Discussion

Total Avg Compensation

September 2021 Hedge Fund

  • Vice President (19) $498
  • Director/MD (10) $359
  • NA (5) $306
  • Portfolio Manager (7) $297
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (19) $272
  • 2nd Year Associate (28) $241
  • Engineer/Quant (51) $237
  • 1st Year Associate (64) $187
  • Analysts (188) $168
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $125
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (211) $82