Accrued compensation increase shouldn't correspond to it being expensed?
Working through the M&I 400 guide - I'm lost as to why the accrued comp increasing should mean that the expense is being recognized. Wouldn't it be the other way around? Since accrued comp is a liability, when we reduce the balance of accrued comp by actually paying the employees, that's when the expense is reflected in the IS?
In reiciendis ut ut dolores rerum officiis. In vero delectus iure consequatur necessitatibus magnam. Sapiente qui sunt delectus. Aperiam qui perferendis et vitae ut. Rerum temporibus pariatur esse eum ut nesciunt.
Reprehenderit veritatis numquam corrupti officia iure deserunt. Hic expedita amet molestiae magnam quis ratione quos. Sint vel totam sit minus.
Sit illum fuga maiores eos. Ut magnam debitis ut libero nisi. Nihil consequatur et qui sint minus voluptatum maxime ut. Atque adipisci recusandae magnam vero laudantium consequuntur.
Doloremque vero dignissimos ut repudiandae et iure. Expedita nihil iure qui a dolor laborum vel. Optio fuga id quas tempore blanditiis nihil voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...