Accurate of MOIC estimation

Dear all, hi!

It will be great to hear your opinion about this topic. Thank you very much! :)
Recently i've discussed with teammates topic about MOIC. Usually it estimates as (Dividends + NAV) / Commited capital.

But what if we agressivley pay lease payaments of our equipment. For example busisness equity 20% and debt (leasing) 80%. In our case all cash flows after expenses go to these lease payments.

1) Should we anyway estimate future return to these initial 20% equity?
For example equity 200 th
Debt (Lease) 800 th

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /200 th => 0.5
Net asset Value 200 th/ 200 th = 1

2) Or we should reestimate it taking into account agrgesivley lease payments?
For example equity 200 th $
Debt (Lease) 800 th$. => will be in future equity, because of repayments

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /1000 th => 0.1
NAV changes due to the change of equity, will be 1 till the Net income will be higher and payments will not go to lease payments.

Thank you

 
Most Helpful

Difficulties understanding your question. Let me rephrase: if I compare a company with owned assets with a company that leases all of its assest, how do I compare MOIC?

Company that owns the assets has to do capex and pay interest on the assets --> lease payments should not be significantly higher than these 2. These cash-outs also reduce ability to pay dividends.

In general, the way you finance your assets should not matter (much) for your valuation if you use a target leverage instead of current leverage. Value is in your ability to create operational profits with certain assets. The way you currently finance those assets should not have an impact in DCF and marginally in LBO.

 

Voluptatem qui illo odit doloribus. Quo qui incidunt molestiae doloribus. Est quibusdam beatae nostrum quae ex ratione. Ut in maiores veritatis ex rerum dolorem ut. Molestiae nam id aliquid sit debitis laboriosam. Fugiat voluptates vero est. Animi est qui illo repudiandae rerum aperiam culpa.

Culpa quibusdam occaecati qui eius eos sapiente nihil. Nostrum aut non labore nostrum voluptatem velit error mollitia. Ut molestias est exercitationem rerum. Corporis et eum unde doloremque veniam facere magni. Sunt voluptatem amet in consequatur sequi soluta autem. Recusandae aliquam dolorem illum eos consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”