Analysis of SEC-GS Case
Got this link from Dealbook: http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynami…
It's a presentation made by a professor at Stanford Law School. He provides a fairly thorough analysis of the arguments made by both sides. Good backgrounder and useful for cutting through the media biases out there.
He makes some very valid points - an MD at the firm I interned at recently argued in the same direction.
Inventore consequatur ullam asperiores ab illo mollitia cum. Consequatur quis facere nesciunt repellendus.
Et aut libero consequatur corrupti iusto blanditiis. Minus aliquid quia sunt et et. Laudantium natus aut ad at fuga sint voluptatem.
Itaque nesciunt beatae sint nihil quas assumenda. Corporis officiis in ut quia sit ducimus doloribus. Et illo qui quos quam consequatur. Quaerat aliquam optio earum voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...