Analysts - Pay vs WLB

What is your trade off point between pay vs WLB? e.g., "I'm happy to work 80+ hr weeks but pay better be minimum $150k + $150k" vs "I'll take $75k + $25k to work 40 hr weeks". What's your number and/or what would you trade off / require for the mix of pay vs work life balance?

 
Most Helpful

I mean its tough to say. I like the people I work with, the clients I interact with, and some of the work that actually makes me use my head. That being said, a lot of it sucks too and WLB takes a hit. So there is more that I think about than time in and time out. I tend to be happiest around bonus season obviously, with an immediate dip after when I think "damn gonna be another year until that happens again." Then kind of neutral through the rest of the year. I try my best to make time for life shit, and while sometimes I gotta cancel, I am able to see ahead far enough to know if I can make things. Maybe that comes with having earned some MD trust and being at the more senior level among analysts. Plus I imagine at the associate level, I can start passing off some of the most menial time consuming stuff. I know it doesn't get that much easier and is still a ton of work, but I'm sure it helps. But I guess for your question, I couldn't really go below where I am currently at financially because it's what I am used to now. Maybe down the road I'll dip, but for now I'm gonna hang around. Even if there was a job with a better WLB for the same salary, I am not sure I would jump just yet because I like the growth prospects and salary upside in the future that I have now. Doesn't really answer your question, but thought I'd offer my perspective. For context, my bank pays absolute middle of the road. 

Dayman?
 

Think its important to consider future earnings too... Some will slave away earning 150k because 300k is right around the corner, not because 150k is their trade off point.

 

So without over thinking it, the same company you like, same people you like, they say look you can work 80+ hr weeks doing shitty tasks and we'll pay you X, or you do 40 hr weeks (8 hr days, no weekend work), more meaningful tasks, more advisory, deal strategy type stuff, but we'll pay you Y instead. And your earning trajectory is scaled accordingly also. So your next level promotion is X x2 still doing the crazy hours or Y x2 with the better work life balance. I suppose I'm asking because I find it is always just the $$$ that wins out. Everyone talks about the value of WLB, but in the end they go for the higher $$$ anyways. So what is peoples' number that is the break even point between pay vs WLB?

 

I hear you. I'm the same way. I'm the guy always trying to say to HR "just give them more money and they'll be fine." And then I always have to listen to them telling me that isn't what the young generation wants, it isn't about the money only, it's aboutnl experiences, work life balance, etc etc reasons why we won't pay them more. But I am still yet to see any concrete examples where someone passes on the extra $$$ for the WLB instead. But I figure there has to be some break even point for this trade off.

 

I think COVID taught us all that there is a breakeven point, hence the mass exodus at the junior levels. Most of us won’t get comp’d for the additional ~10-20 hours/week that’s being put in, but as long as there are people willing to work it, and put those firm stickers on their resume, banks will pay what the market accepts. (Including my dumbass self.) Do most people plan on doing IB for life? No, not at all, but our breakeven point has much less tail-risk at this point in our lives than when we’re in our young thirties and trynna start a family.

 

Nihil corporis consequatur nulla ipsam molestiae perferendis saepe. Dicta ducimus voluptatibus ea dolor quidem et. Nisi nostrum temporibus animi est ipsum. Dolorem et sed quasi natus voluptatem molestiae voluptatem. Nulla dolores id non sed eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”