Auditor gets offer from both Regional botique and PwC CF team, WHICH ONE?

Hi everyone, I am currently going through an important life decision right now.. Having spent about 2.5 years in PwC audit, I am currently able to secure two offers, one from PwC CF team and one from Regional boutique IB. My goal is try to get into PE/VC and I am currently in NZ but quite keen to expand to AU in the future. 

The regional IB has these considerations: (1) IB analyst sounds better ... (2) have a variety of exposure to M&A, debt advisory (probably a bit more emphasis on debt advisory: probably 1/3 in M&A and the rest for debt advisory); (3) straight off the bat lots of involvement in the preparation of IM, pitch books, term sheets etc; (4) They have a small PE in the firm too, which is too small to be in but i guess they do some work for their own PE shop and this will be a good experience as opposed to being the sole financial service provider, I guess this is quite important for moving into pe too? and (5) there is a profit share scheme... 


For PwC, the pros are more around it is M&A heavy, the name is probably bigger in M&A compared to the regional IB, I don't have to take a step down so pay is a little bit better than regional IB. The only concern is probably around the fact that I may have to start with the valuation and financial modeling first and have to slowly move into the M&A advisory later.  


Anyone has experiences or take around this? If I want to move into PE/VC in the future, which one would be considered a better choice?


Anyone who needs advice on moving from audit to IB/CF I am keen to answer too :) 

 

I would say extremely… I have interviewed for at least over 80 times within 2-3 months time and this is the only one I can get. pwC CF would only give me a chance until I got an offer from IB. I think if you are in audit you just have accept that you are the underdog with very slim chances and there is nothing you can do except grinding…

 

Hi man - really appreciate taking your time to write this comment. You are def right re how competitive it is in the Australisia market. This particular boutique is quite well known around the debt advisory space, but M&A def cannot match PwC CF, think I am probably leaning towards PwC right now, as there are a lot more history/data to indicate people jumping into bigger banks (macquarie prodeomiantly). The pay at PwC is higher because I don't need to take a step down, I am moving from Audit senior to CF senior analyst, whereas I have to become an IB Analsyt if I move into IB (excluding bonus as I am still uncertain on how much the profit share from the IB would be). But anyway that is very helpful mate, thanks a lot for your contribution! 

 

Hi Mate, working in Sydney IB currently. To echo the comments above, it is highly dependent on the brand name of the boutique, but unless there is strong historic placement into Aus/NZ IB from the boutique, I think it is a no-brainer to go for PwC.

Being at PwC will allow you to transition to Aus more seamlessly and the M&A reps will be far more valuable than the M&A debt mix (especially considering your intention to move into PE/VC in the future). Not to mention the PwC brand name will definitely get you interviews at top EBs and BBs; it is a very trodden path.

 

Thanks a lot man. Seems like it is def a better choice at the moment in time and I will probably take the pwc despite it may appear that it will take me a bit longer given I need to finish the whole audit project during busy season and will have to start with valuation and modeling, but one good thing about NZ is that it’s quite fluid between valuation and M&A advisory so we will see how it goes :)

 

Sapiente dolore ut sint neque qui et earum. Nobis nostrum autem ut delectus placeat praesentium. Officiis quo sit provident totam aspernatur dolor non et. Illum sequi deleniti voluptatum quo sit ullam.

Facilis voluptatem dolore dolor autem consectetur omnis. Numquam sapiente eum soluta et voluptas cum harum. Et itaque aut eum deserunt optio non. Cum magnam accusamus illo molestiae repellat earum et. Adipisci sapiente sit fugit sapiente.

Distinctio officiis quia quo esse modi dicta. Totam laboriosam quam aut quibusdam molestiae. Omnis voluptatem consequuntur nesciunt ducimus. Natus quia ut eius quia repellat. Quibusdam eum repellendus consequatur autem itaque molestiae eius. Enim fugit voluptatem et enim numquam quisquam ea.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”