Baird vs William Blair vs Piper Sandler vs Harris Williams
I know I want to go middle market. After doing research on tons of mm banks, I came down to these four. What are your thoughts- which one do you favor the most out of them?
Thanks!
Trending Content
| +162 | The "Not So Obvious" things that get you a return offer? | 19 | 16m | |
| +89 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 20 | 39m | |
| +61 | Best IB group on the Street | 26 | 1s | |
| +52 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 13 | 11h | |
| +46 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 24 | 1h | |
| +41 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 22 | 2s | |
| +36 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 22h | |
| +35 | Georgetown Placement for 2024 and 2025 | 21 | 6d | |
| +31 | Highest Paid Bankers in Toronto? | 50 | 1d | |
| +30 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 2d |
Career Resources
Blair
seconded
what is the street’s view on Baird?
In terms of culture, there are some threads here talking about how awesome it is and some talking about how horrible it is. In my own experience, I have only spoken with two people and one was a great guy while the other was, while not mean, kinda douchy.
Blair with Baird at a close second. Don’t know much about piper post merger, but still known for their HC team. Would say on par with HW, and offers a greater variety of work. Surprised HL isn’t in here. They have a very competitive C&R and industrials team (maybe HC?). All great places to work though.
why Baird over HW?
Honestly, pretty group dependent. Can't provide too much detail but Baird is known for being an industrial powerhouse. In addition, I think there is a greater emphasis on retaining talent than at HW. Both offer a great M&A experience; however, you might see a greater variety of work at Baird, as HW is strictly sell-side M&A. In my eyes, HW/HL/Baird and Piper are all very reputable MM players - with Blair slightly edging them out. Again, all of this is group dependent.
Does it matter if you have no offers? It's going to be highly group dependent, along with a variety of other factors.
This exactly. And all the above posts are useless for the most part with no explanations as to why they view certain banks as the "best."
At the end of the day, these are all very reputable MM firms and exits are comparable. Really depends more on group and each individual person's performance / preferences (do you want pure M&A, location, industry preference, etc.).
to make it more specific, if you were looking at all offices in the midwest (no preference between minneapolis, chicago, or milwaukee), wanted to work in consumer, and were interested most in pe placement how would you choose between the four.
Blair without a doubt
Blair Hl Baird HW Piper
Fix my ranking then
someone's salty
I have a fair amount of experience with all these guys from a MM/UMM PE perspective (buying companies from them, engaging them to sell companies, hiring their analysts, etc.) Keep in mind that these are my experiences with a relatively small subset of bankers at each of these firms and your experience may vary dramatically from mine, but I've interacted with each of these folks enough to have a sense for each banks "personality"
Blair, Lazard MM, and Houlihan would be my picks. My fund has hired all three of those groups for sellsides and I came away very impressed with all of them (both at the junior and senior levels) - very smart and efficient, actually added value throughout the process vs. just processing documents and handling administrative BS. Their analysts I've interviewed have also been solid. Anecdotal, but I believe Blair is less open to recruiting than the other two. I know Lazard MM has had very solid exits (at least out of their midwest offices).
Baird seems like nice guys, but can't really opine on the experience there. I would avoid Piper - shitty culture and I'm not super impressed with their senior guys (this might piss people off, but their MDs reminded me of the worst caricatures of bankers, a la Monkey Business. We hired them on one sellside and regretted it).
I'm not sure how I feel about Harris Williams. On one hand, their sellside process is like a well-oiled machine. They've got a very solid playbook, know all the sponsors really well, and really go to bat for the analysts (their HR sends an email to their sponsor relationships every year encouraging them to hire their analysts, which is kind of insane). On the flip side, I have been consistently underwhelmed when interviewing their analysts. Maybe it's the "machine" aspect to their process, in that they generally seemed incapable of independent, unstructured thought (which is kind of important for this business), but could rattle off prepared vault guide answers like no one else.
Do you think this is a more a byproduct of the way they’ve been taught to think or the qualities they look for when hiring analysts? My point being, would I be hindered by going to HW for my analyst years, if the goal is to get in, but also to succeed in mm PE
Can’t really comment on succeeding in pe as I’m just a prospect, but I can say that HW places lights out into mm pe. This is largely because they want their analysts to continue on to pe and will help facilitate the process — MDs making calls on your behalf, etc.
This is great insight. I would love to hear your thoughts about another MM bank on a similar tier to these guys. Would you mind sending me a message?
Which groups were you working with?
blair/hw > baird > piper
Just out of curiosity, what made you exclude some of the other top MM like HL, RBC, Jefferies
Jeffries is in a different league from the others at the very top of the MM space. RBC is a BB.
Rbc is not a BB. They’re on their way there but not yet. If RBC is a bb then Jefferies is even more of a BB
Agreed. RBC is NOT a BB. Love how there's always an RBC employee on every thread saying it's a BB. Get a life!
They all have active balance sheets, whether they are BBs or not is irrelevant
They are all solid shops, but the "better" bank depends on what group, location or product you want to focus on. It also depends on what you want to do (stay in banking? buyside? corporate?) I know HW's motto is getting their junior staff into the buyside, and turning that into future opportunities. Some MDs on the Piper Energy team will get you a job in PE locked up your first year, but you have to promise you'll work your ass off during your analyst years there - that makes sense to me: MDs know you want to go buyside, they have the relationships and can give you recs, you don't have to sneak out, study your ass off and stress, they get your commitment to work hard while you're there. Baird and William Blair are great firms too.
Sincerely, Someone who has actually been in the field and interviewed with 3 of the 4 firms you mentioned.
I think I would agree with others that all of the shops mentioned are great firms, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. A few things I have seen in the market over the past two years: -Baird and Blair both continue to be leaders in the space, particularly in Industrials -Piper Sandler seems to be moving upstream. I think this board has historically shit on them pretty hard, but their HC, Consumer and Industrials (most recently) teams are doing extremely well. Sandler is certainly helping on the FIG side -Harris Williams was likely near the top, if not the top, a few years ago. While they are a highly-respected shop without a doubt, their reputation in the market has somewhat declined over the past year or so. They have had numerous busted processes and can't seem to get out of their own way at times
Again, we are likely splitting hairs here as they are all really good shops.
bump
Piper Sandler's healthcare team is very good in the middle market, probably one of the best banks in the medtech space. The FIG's team which is everyone from Sandler O'Neil is also one of the best in the MM space, more M&A deals than any other bank over the last 7 years. FIGs team is a small step above KBW.
Might be different at the analyst level, but perspective among my peers (top 10 MBA) it was widely considered:
Baird/Blair were the top: Baird advantage in Industrials, Blair advantage in Tech/Healthcare. Both have "larger bank" support and resources. Strong focus on culture which for post-MBA associates who are not jumping ship in 2 years makes a huge difference. Both also use A2A promotes fairly regularly.
Harris Williams: as mentioned above, well-oiled sell side M&A, but no real exposure to capital markets (if that matters to you).
Piper: More group and location dependent than the others, as they have simply been buying up other small banks like crazy. Good deal flow, more mixed reviews about culture from alumni.
All of these are top MM firms, good luck.
(Recruited and interviewed at each, know friends at 3 of the 4
How would you rank HL’s C&R group amongst this list?
if chicago office - super duper sweat
Sorry a bit unrelated. How does a Stifel compare to those four? Thank you in advance
They are like Lincoln international
Thank you. You'd say below Harris Williams and Raymond James too?
Definitely
Do satellite offices at these firms affect opportunities for pe recruiting.
this, and comp
Comp is the same across all offices
Above have mentioned that differences among these MM firms are often group/location dependent. Could anyone speak to NYC specifically?
If you know you want to be in NYC, I wouldn’t target these firms- all of Baird/Blair/HW/HL specialize outside of NYC. Can only speak to Blair but NYC is a tiny office, don’t even think they hire SAs there.
What about location specific rankings. HW Richmond vs Piper Charlotte vs Blair Charlotte vs RJ Atlanta vs HL Atlanta?
Other than HW Richmond, I believe these are all smaller offices and curious if anyone knows much about deal flow/culture at each
I'd also add Blair Atlanta at this point. New office.
Also curious
These banks all have good placement to MMPE from their hq offices. Do satellite offices affect pe placement at all?
Harris Williams has the highest comp of this group
Do you know if bonus figures were given out this year for hw
I don’t think this is true? HW is owned by PNC so profits are getting eaten up there, whereas Baird/Blair are private partnerships so all earnings are paid out to employees. This may be the case at the junior level, but I don’t see how it’s possible across the board.
I can't speak to Director+ level, but it is definitely true from Analyst to VP. I'm pretty sure he was referring to junior level as well, because who on this forum is really a senior banker..
PNC comment doesn’t check out. M&A bankers won’t take less comp for their work just because their group is a subsidiary of a larger commercial bank. They would just leave and go to a bank that pays market comp. When you buy an investment bank you are buying the people that generate revenue. If you don’t pay them accordingly they will and do leave.
This is a very group specific question; it's pointless otherwise
It’s group specific in that each of those banks except hw only has one maybe two groups in those offices. Regardless I would choose HW richmond over all being that it’s the HQ office compared to various satellites.
Quod nemo totam et eligendi amet qui. Rerum qui libero omnis perferendis rerum.
Iure qui laborum esse explicabo voluptatibus aut. Mollitia saepe maiores quos aut. Itaque quos ducimus eum. Eum et iste et temporibus ea ipsa blanditiis. Libero enim minima et ut. Hic labore non non aut incidunt veniam ex. Eaque voluptate fugit rem.
Velit modi quia est totam ut odio. Sunt et quam minima dicta itaque ipsa voluptatem. Distinctio quis et fuga voluptas placeat fugit rerum. Laborum fuga laboriosam consectetur.
Optio officia consequatur voluptates est non enim. Voluptas blanditiis ipsa laborum autem consequatur amet sapiente.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Magnam quasi sit possimus velit harum. Quia et saepe et rerum id. Natus minus odio nesciunt sint quia et ratione sapiente. Ut voluptate aliquid autem maiores modi. Quia asperiores et ipsa reprehenderit nisi soluta impedit aut.
Sed fugit omnis tempora velit voluptatem quis aut. Minus eum iste aut eum eum sint deleniti sapiente. In ut at at sed hic nesciunt quibusdam molestiae. Illo odit laborum eum voluptates. Pariatur eos sunt temporibus rerum omnis pariatur. Quia voluptates sit assumenda animi nam sapiente.
Nisi distinctio aut quis iure molestiae placeat tempore. Eveniet repellat dolores molestiae adipisci quod ut totam. Unde natus inventore eius velit. Aspernatur impedit sed officiis corrupti. Necessitatibus nulla qui aperiam doloribus in.