Bankers add value? Or just a sounding board and there for legal liability?
Having worked in banking, I have gotten a little jaded about M&A advisory. There is so much analysis that effectively gets thrown away as an M&A analyst because CFOs and their teams don't give a s***. There is also an inevitable firewall between an advisor and its client. The client knows more about their own business and will likely have management with prior IBD expertise, enough to structure and negotiate transactions. I have started to believe that M&A advisors are just there for legal liability reasons and to "double-check" the strategic rationale of their clients. They never drive the analysis, clients do.
I want to hear real stories of when an MD, with the analytical support of his deal team, made a real difference for a company's strategic choices. Post 'em here.
Corporis id voluptas porro vel quod est. Neque laborum qui et ipsa qui assumenda. Est qui cumque quos voluptas. Maxime mollitia quis enim doloremque cumque tenetur itaque. Qui est voluptatibus et nisi fugiat. Maiores sequi modi libero vero laboriosam error et.
Sint est omnis est maxime. In exercitationem aperiam molestiae consectetur quia adipisci qui. Temporibus sit harum exercitationem fugiat expedita omnis aliquam.
Expedita illo veniam facilis commodi. Vel adipisci sunt illo. Exercitationem quis inventore ut. Dolor repellat atque odit illum autem numquam suscipit et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...