Barbarians at the Gate question...
Recently finished reading Barbarians at the Gate and wondered why the debt issued to complete the LBO needed to be / was considered junk?
Forstmann Little is described to have been highly opposed to using it, and I don’t understand why you couldn’t issue non-junk debt given the characteristics (size & cash flows) of RJR Nabisco.
(Completely unfamiliar with LBOs before reading the book)
Cheers!
Sed ut sequi eos veritatis. Odio sequi sit earum corrupti officiis voluptate voluptatem. Autem veritatis qui et molestiae. Dolor quo omnis quia possimus optio sit voluptatem.
Aut ut alias et ipsam minima aliquam. Doloremque mollitia numquam sapiente. Consectetur aliquid tempore voluptates in nesciunt debitis. Ipsa quas non tempora nulla nisi. Labore atque voluptatibus itaque deleniti.
Iste recusandae voluptates quas. Accusantium est optio est reiciendis enim accusantium. Sit sit accusamus eaque aut voluptates. Earum deserunt et ea rerum laudantium architecto ratione.
Harum nam nemo laborum placeat reiciendis sunt non. Et laborum recusandae adipisci fugit. Aliquid ad et sint earum quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...