Thanks for doing this. What was your recruiting process from the BB? How did you navigate conversations with HHs and prepare for interviews? Is there "on-cycle" for L/S HFs like Tiger Cubs or do you have to be ok with opportunistically waiting for the occasional hiring need throughout the analyst stint?

What is the typical background for analysts at your current fund?

 

How much does current valuation / actionability matter vs simply having a good pitch? i.e. if I have a name I wrote up 6 months ago, and the valuation ran away from me, did you use names like that, or were the names still relatively attractive on a valuation basis when you pitched them for interviews?

 

Thoughts on L/S industry and your long-term career plans?

 

tell us about the most typical activities you're doing on the job. my largest concern with HFs when I was thinking about this route is how much time is spent translating the revenue > cash flow lines from 10Ks and Qs to an excel format before getting to the analysis.

VS say in PE, where there is less granular info, so you can get to the meat of the evaluation fairly quickly. I've done PE but im less familiar with workstreams at a HF, correct me if im wrong...

 

On the spectrum of “go find and show us an idea” to having a formalized standard set of analyses / presentations, what has been your experience at the tiger fund? If you have the context, how does that compare with other hedge funds?

One of the big things I’ve noticed transitioning from IB to PE is that there is much less hand holding and you’re not necessarily structuring analyses in the same format over and over like in banking (pretty much every CIM was the same on a structural basis). With that said, there are some standard things we tend to include in all of our IC decks, but I’m curious if that’s also the case in the HF world, or if it’s really much more open ended on what you think is important to include in a pitch

 

Good question, there's much less hand holding than banking. Almost everyone struggles with this initially. So very similar in that regard.

The work varies depending on the idea you're considering. You need a broad tool box that you can reach into, depending on the circumstance. There are certain "essentials," (esp. when it comes to modeling) but that said, each firm/PM likes to see certain things in inv. proposals, so you have to feel that out

 

How would you rate your investment skills on day 1? Did you feel capable of legitimately adding an idea to the book entirely on your own or more like you could flesh out a thesis that was handed to you? If more of the former than the latter, how did you develop these skills beforehand? Alternatively, if you feel like you've grown in the role what have you learned and developed since being in the investing seat?

On the modeling side of things, how did your abilities from IB compare to the types of models that the fund uses on their positions? What were some of the biggest learning curves to tackle on a technical side?

How would you describe your allocation of time between modeling, reading Q's and K's, reading sell-side research, talking to company's, talking to expert networks etc.

What's the average duration of the investments in your fund? Did anything surprise you about how they executed on their investment philosophy? What do you think sets apart your fund from others?

Lastly, what do you feel are some of the bigger misconceptions about the role/industry for all of the people that "want" to get into hedge funds but don't really know much about them (watch too much Billions probably)?

 

I was competent coming in (could run with anything given to me), but came up the rest of the learning curve quickly. People will like you if you can add value day 1, though no one expects you to be an expert.

Every fund approaches modeling differently. IB prepared me well for my fund. The biggest learning curve isn't on the technical side of things. People that arent in the industry worry about that too much.

Research time is allocated differently depending on the idea. The basic public info is step 1 of every process.

We like to take a 2-3 year view. The quality of our research sets us apart. I didn't buy that argument coming in, but it's a real advantage.

Biggest misconception is that this is a get rich quick scheme. Public markets are brutally competitive and even on your best ideas, you're going to be wrong 40-50% of the time.

 

Thanks for the response! Just a couple other questions to run by you if you don't mind.

What do you think enables you guys to have better research? Smarter people? A greater willingness to commit money to research? A longer timeline letting you build theses over a greater period of time?

And I find it interesting that you say that people who aren't in the industry worry about the technical side too much, because every shop I've interviewed at/talked to seemed obsessed with it. Do you think that might come down to the differences of a tiger cub that gets to do the 2-3 year horizon vs the majority of funds chasing quarterly performance these days?

 

From my own research on LinkedIn (and anecdotally) it seems that most investment professionals at Tiger cubs and other top fundamental HF are generally recruited after IB and then 1-2 years at MF PE.

Obviously you were able to skip the PE step; would you say that most funds like (but don't require) PE experience? I have wondered if the prevalence of the 2+2 track is due to the early timing of PE recruiting; it seems possible that many top candidates are swept up early by PE and then decide to pursue HF after that.

Thanks for doing this, would love any insight you have. I'm very interested in L/S HF and about to start my summer in IB; would love to hear that PE isn't another necessary step.

 
Most Helpful

If people are really interested in what matters (investing acumen), subscribe to this thread. I'll think of a way to help the most people with the smallest time commitment on my end

[Addition after the initial post given feedback below]: Too many people worry about technical skills for way too long (that said, there's a certain base you do need to break in, FD). Investing acumen is a lifetime goal and will set you apart. Most bankers (that I know) don't think like shrewd investors because they don't have to. I've now gotten ~10 DMs about this point and ultimately won't be able to respond to everything. I consider my time valuable, as you should yours, and I'm trying to be efficient. This advice (and outlet) is free/open to view and, considering the below, may be more credible if there's some gating/paywall. Something I didn't consider before; behavioral economics is weird like that

 

Hi thanks for your q&a.

Why did you choose the HF route over traditional long only asset management? Ignoring things like comp.

How are you dealing with the COVID-19 situation, what factors were implemented to reduce your risk and deal with the situation or did you sell and cut your position sizes as quickly as possible ?

If you could turn back time how would you hedge your portfolio against something like COVID-19

Thank you

 

Hard to ignore things like comp :)

Can't discuss too much about us (compliance, call me paranoid), but generally firms are and had been adjusting net and gross exposure to deal with COVID. Firms generally also cut exposure to COVID impacted businesses in March. This was a big shock to even the most experienced guys: some of the businesses we considered safest got hit like a bus. Some decisions to sell are even controversial today and I'm sure we'll be discussing the initial COVID response at our offsite.

If I could turn back the clock, I'd run the Bill Ackman trade. If you haven't read about it, you should.

Will answer anything else for the next 20...

 

Do you focus on the same industry group you covered in IB at your fund?

 

A lateral move is absolutely not a must. I know many people that started off in one IB coverage group and landed in another in both PE/HFs. However, the onus is on you to be well prepared for the interview / competitive. You can't walk in day 1 without a great understanding of the TMT vertical you're interested in and enthusiasm for the space. IMO, the whole "I can learn on the job" tale isn't convincing in the interview room, if you even make it there. I'd have something on your resume that connects the dots for the interviewers ahead of time.

If you do want to lateral, that's a different conversation and hard to answer your question. I'd prioritize best experience + name brand.

 

At your fund, what's the (approximate) percentage mix of people who went from BB IB, EB M&A, EB Rx, and PE?

 

Worked at a HF last summer and working this summer at GS/MS/EVR IB. Really interested in making the leap to HF. Two questions:

When did you start recruiting / interacting with HHs? From what I have heard anecdotally, it seems like it is more bespoke than PE recruiting, along with some IB analysts leaving for a HF before their two year stint was over at a bank. What did your process look like?

I have been doing my own research work since being sent home from college in March-- do you think there is any value in polishing up to submit to VIC and other similar sites? Not sure my work is up to par but doesn't seem like there is huge downside.

Thank you for doing this-- really helpful thread so far.

 

Hi. Thanks for this. I have a few questions I'd really appreciate your input on: I am a 27 yr old Math/Finance student at european university. Previously I've been working in a small business(VP) in the consumer services industry. I quit my job for university at 26. So, I have work experience before pursuing a bachelor. At the time of graduation, I'll be 29/30 y/o and I would like to become A PM. I love research, investing and math. I like to understand the competitive dynamics, understand the needs of advertisers, understand user behavior. The ability to understand how the world economies are intertwined, thinking through what instruments will be impacted, and the complexity of keeping it all together is a great problem to be solving. Also, I love to investigate Datas like a Detective to get the answer of the question. I've done some value investing of my own. I want to get into it, and I'm a quick learner. After graduating I am planning to apply for a target Master in Finance or math. Do you think it's possible to break into HF? Am I too old? What would be the best way to break into the field?

 

Thanks for your note. FD I'm not familiar with many European funds, so there might be a difference from the US. As promised, here are my thoughts.

You're definitely not “too old,” but I don't think a masters in finance or math will help you break in. You're better off spending your time on the side in self-study mode + networking. I think you have a few options post-graduation: sell-side, AM, try to backdoor your way into a HF, or go corporate. Yes that's everything and the kitchen sink, but that's also my point. It really doesn't matter what you do as long as you get good experience (can craft a story) and can self-study on the side (the later note goes for pretty much every job outside of the role itself, including ER). Ultimately you'll need to get smart on what matters (valuation, business analysis, etc.) and get to know people in the HF community.

If you haven't read Damodaran's online class notes on valuation, start there and finish them within a few weeks. If you DM me after, I'll give you what I'd consider to be a good next step.

Cheers all. This is the last from me on this thread. Best of luck to everyone. Still thinking of a way I can help in a scalable way. Subscribe to the channel / banana the post if you're still interested and sorry if my answers bored you ;) Stick with an index fund

 

Hey - I recently jumped to a Tiger cub as well after a stint in banking. Definitely have struggled at first with being more productive / self-guided. Wanted to ask for some best practices / things you found useful as you started ramping up (e.g. one of the things I’m planning on doing is hopping on the phone with other analysts to learn more about their processes) Thanks for doing this!

 

Which Tiger cubs take people with only 1-2 years of experience (either in banking or PE)? Ik Tiger Global, for instance, takes mainly people who've done the traditional BB/EB -> MF route, but no analysts there come directly from their banking gig.

It would be great to get a comprehensive list, or just a few examples you came across in your recruiting process. Thanks!

 

can you share typical investing style of tiger cubs? From what I know they invest 2-5 years long term fundamental based analysis and they avoid cyclical sectors such as semiconductor and commodities. Would you say there is anything more in addition to these?

 

Ratione quidem quis porro voluptas. Deleniti et libero fugit sint laudantium. Vel sit ut ex consequatur aut et. Quod accusantium et est quia sed rerum. Ut amet non sunt illum veritatis quia.

Ut suscipit ipsa eligendi culpa. Non voluptatem quaerat quas. Est nam doloribus deserunt numquam facere.

 

Et aut officiis sint tenetur. Qui et vero voluptas sit ex qui placeat velit. Aut esse consequatur distinctio quae dignissimos.

Provident consectetur esse asperiores ratione nesciunt. Excepturi ut eum enim illo. Maxime molestias placeat placeat quis et cum. Sequi omnis sunt minus hic.

In voluptate voluptatem eveniet accusamus et quaerat eum excepturi. Sunt culpa veritatis quaerat vel laudantium consequatur. Quis est non ipsam eligendi perspiciatis voluptatem. Nam consequatur qui earum. Ut aut asperiores consequuntur qui enim minus laborum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”