peinvestor2012:

LBO model using acquisitions. Pretty standard.

Not trying to be a douche, but I think I'm missing something b/c I said Acc./Dil. - would you mind explaining at a high level why LBO vs. Acc./Dil.?

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 
BepBep12:
peinvestor2012:

LBO model using acquisitions. Pretty standard.

Not trying to be a douche, but I think I'm missing something b/c I said Acc./Dil. - would you mind explaining at a high level why LBO vs. Acc./Dil.?

Private equity firms usually engage in rollups, not strategic buyers. I think that peinvestor is making this assumption.

 
Best Response

PE Perspective: You should start with an LBO, since that is how you are acquiring the initial platform company.

Then, in your going-forward projections, you have the P&L and CFs of the platform. For each target acquisition, modify the cash flows for the amount that is internally financed and add in the interest expense for any new debt that is taken on. Then add the financials from the target beginning from the date where you expect the transaction to close. Do that for each potential acquisition.

Then, you should have consolidated financial statements that include the platform and all acquired targets. Assume an exit multiple off the consolidated EBITDA and calc your return.

Strategic Perspective (I'm taking a crack at this based on intuition, but haven't had to do a rollup for a strategic. This is how I would approach this): You have the acquirer's standalone financials, cash flows, and balance sheet projected. If you are financing with balance sheet cash and raising straight debt, then shares outstanding shouldn't change. Thus, many of the points I mentioned above will apply here (pro forma-ing the financials for each target acquisition and affected cash flows and net debt appropriately). You'll end up with a consolidated net income number, and then calc EPS based on the shares outstanding you assumed before.

 
watdo:
BepBep12:
peinvestor2012:

LBO model using acquisitions. Pretty standard.

Not trying to be a douche, but I think I'm missing something b/c I said Acc./Dil. - would you mind explaining at a high level why LBO vs. Acc./Dil.?

Private equity firms usually engage in rollups, not strategic buyers. I think that peinvestor is making this assumption.

Partially. Generally rolling up is synonymous PE. But, we will run an LBO even as we advise strategic clients on the buy side to assess the value of leveraged returns. If a strategic is planning to buy and hold and use debt to fund a significant portion of the acquisition, we want to see what the returns look like for a given transaction value (and exit value) or inversely what valuation range to target given return expectations.

BepBep, you are right that A/D is one way to do it. If the acquisition involves debt though, we will likely run both. However, the LBO has built in acquisitions that make roll-ups easier to analyze. But, what happens if it is funded with 100% debt, as CaliBanker alluded to? A/D is rather obvious at that point, though the degree will vary. But, your client wants to see how quickly they can repay debt (or make another acquisition) and the returns the acquisition(s) will provide.

 

Deleniti est dolor enim ipsam. At est qui pariatur. Mollitia distinctio ipsa provident.

Inventore doloremque velit omnis voluptates iure error atque culpa. Rem maiores harum sint porro. Totam temporibus possimus enim sed et. Maxime perferendis velit deserunt. Accusantium possimus iste officiis enim.

Consequatur ducimus explicabo in eaque enim voluptatem. Assumenda quae molestiae corrupti sequi cum. Voluptatem expedita eum fuga aut.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”