Big name firms on resume?
I'm thinking of taking an internship position at a small boutique firm near home. I'm wondering how much effect the firm reputation/name has on one's resume, when getting future internships/interviews. when i apply for investment banking + consulting internships (later on) at big firms like JP Morgan, PwC, Deloitte, etc, would my experiences at unknown firms be looked down upon?
Of course not. Having legitimate finance experience is only going to help you out in your search later on down the road. Does the name of the firm make a difference? Naturally, an internship at a BB bank is going to get more recognition, but experience is always better than no experience at all.
I have a no-name boutique on my resume as well. Landed several interviews with BBs. But oddly no luck with MMs or boutiques...
Learn the art of bullshitting a resume.
I always do the "janitor/teacher" substitution. Say you get a job as a janitor at a small school, you can apply for janitor positions at a large school. Same with teaching. However, the size of the institution is somewhat irrelevant if you're trying for a pure lateral transfer from one job description to another.
There are, however, always exceptions, you just have to be smart. In your case, you're just upgrading the institution....you already have work experience in the job you want. If you're creative with how you spin your experience, however, and have actual knowledge, you may be able to do it, and good references help as well.
I hope this helps.
That is strange. Care to go into more detail? Is it for IBD->IBD or IBD->???somethingelseIBD->IBD. I have international background though so probably that's sth to stand out.
Hmm if you meant "international" as in "needs sponsorship", that could be the reason why. It's a lot easier for BBs to sponsor internationals, so MMs may have just thought you weren't worth the trouble.
Name vs. Experience (Originally Posted: 12/09/2008)
What matters more as far as an entry level job goes, name and prestige of the firm or the experience. I have two offers from firms that are not even in the same sector or industry. One offer is with a leading government contracting company, however the work is not challenging (overqualified) but the name is big and there are definite opportunities to advance. The second offer comes from a smaller firm in the oil/energy industry, but it is a front office role and I will be exposed to many things and the opportunities to advance are great.
any help would be appreciated
..oil/energy. depends on what you want to do i guess.
let me put my answer in perspective.
JPMorgan private banker versus boutique investment banker for a job at a buyout/private investment fund. banker has the appropriate skillset for an investment/deal-oriented role, private banker could be good with investor relations, each that pay significant bonuses/commission, etc.
volatility trader from a small hedge fund versus a fixed income operations staffer from Goldman for a position as another volatility trader. Who has the more relevant skillset?
its all about where you want to advance to..
"its all about job creation, also"
We're about to enter a Great Depression. Don't you want a president who's already dressed for it?
Experience versus Name (Originally Posted: 01/15/2009)
Hey Guys, I've already made up my mind about it, but I would love to get some inputs from you all (primarily the older, more experienced guys out there). What would you value more, experience or name? Let's say you were offered something from a very name-valuable company or industry in which you aren't doing anything significant and you were also offered something for the summer from a smaller, less brand-name company, but the experience is VERY significant with direct exposure to the high level execs. Which would you choose in this economy and what would you choose in a normal economy? Would the less brand name company hurt a candidate for future positions down the line - say 2 to 3 years?
depends on a lot of things - if you are more specific, can comment
would rather be at low ranked bank in ib/s&t than goldman in opps
name is important IF you can leverage it to what you want/spin it - question is whether you have a high enough gpa/stardust to get interviews without a name brand, or whether it will mean something.
also important is the summer conversion factor as in this environment, most companies/banks wont be going back much for full time hires, they'll just pick the interns they like and thats pretty much it...
It also depends on when you are in your career. At the intern level, I think its wiser to take an internship at Goldman Opps rather than lower tier IB simply because you can try to network your way into a Goldman IB spot. However, its better to take the lower tier IB over Goldman Opps so you can get tons of experience, go to a top B-school and then go into a Goldman IB spot.
i would take experience over name good luck with your decision
Yeah, with internet anonymity, I don't want to go too much into specifics, lol. It was basically...think of a banking internship - rewarding and good experience, but admittedly, it's not my passion. The other option was a corporate strategy position that makes me look forward to starting where I would be working right with the executives making significant decisions. The good name, I don't think, would have a high full-time conversion ratio - definitely leverage and contacts though - whereas the corp. position, I was basically told if I do well, I would have a full-time position when I graduate. Both in same city. Both, full-time, would have comparable base salary, and obviously, the corp. position would have little-to-no bonus, but a better work/life ratio.
Also, since I'm here, is it mandatory to put the name of the company on my resume? Can I just list it as something like "large entertainment company" or would people think I'm hiding something?
By the way, I wish you all luck with your summers and full-times this season!
Even a no-name is more well known than "large entertainment company," and they'll be suspicious that maybe you don't want them calling, etc.
In my opinion, it depends on whether the big name role is front office or back office. If it is front office and you just don't like grunt work, then maybe banking isn't for you. If it is back office, I'd say a meaningful role in a corporation is preferable. Of course, if you plan on going corporate strategy FT that's probably what your play should be here.
As an SA in a back office position (risk management) at Goldman, what kind of schedule and pay should one expect?
Risk management isn't exactly back office, it's more respected than ops. It'd generally be classified as middle office. Hours should be comparable to ops or S+T though, definitely not as much as IBD.
I took a job with a major ib that was starting a new group. So it was kind of best/worse of both worlds. Very much a start up feel.
When I was interviewing to leave I had to spin it to why I would choose such a place with no track record.
Most people did not know the name of my firm.
Name of SA internship vs Experience (Originally Posted: 05/08/2010)
Hello everyone,
It's been a long time since I posted here. As some of you already know, I'll continue doing SA internship @ same no-name boutique. Partners promised me lots of awesome experience and 72 virgins.
How much does experience matter during FT recruitment? My MD asked me to start earlier (part-time), because the boutique is getting hammered. I've already built a 900 - 1,100 line projection model (start-up) and just got new task, EPS projections for next 3 years for a public company (tiny but well known in its industry). On top of that I'll have many projects over this summer.
Does SA experience matter during FT recruitment? It seems that name of a company where monkey did his/her SA matters the most.
Sincerely, Puss.
Disagree. I would hire someone who knew what they were talking about over someone who had a name on their resume. With that in mind, if the knowledge level is the same than yes, the name matters. So in that sense, a BB/elite boutique recruit would probably fare better.
Totally agree. I suppose SA internship in no-name place within a small group of people teaches you better to handle responsibilities. Same with the teamwork experience.
Did you get the 72 virgins?
I disagree. Name matters much more than the experience you get for full-time recruiting. Thats for getting interviews. There is a similar post on M&I and he mentions a couple of good reason for that.
I agree... The name of the firm on your resume gets you the interview, and your experience will help you ace it. If you can't get the first interview because the other candidates have big name firms on their resume, they will never learn about your experiences and hear about your strengths. Moreover, I'm pretty sure the experience at the big name firms are pretty good too...
It depends on your overall resume and individual circumstances. If this is freshman summer, then name is more important. If this is a sophomore summer or junior summer than getting an internship in the area that you want for FT is more important than the name. A junior IBD internship at a no name (or MM smallish bank) would be better for FT recruting than having a non-banking internship if your goal is to get IBD. Banker's look at the name, but then they look at your bulletpoints....haveing some solid and noteworthy bulletpoints/experiences can easily beat out name.
Every situation is different however and its depends on the individual resume (GPA, EC, prior work experience, BB PWM internship, ect) and the networking range of the individual...Do you have a lot of alumni who can look at this resume, ect. Fewer alumni connections means you need a better experinece to stand out, but if you have a lot of networking connections you might be able to get by with a name brand internship. Of course, we are talking about name brand FO positions i.e. JPM AM when you want IBD. If you are a junior and have the option between a BB MO or a MM FO postions, take the MM postion without hesitation. You have no idea how many people took at MO positon at BB thinking they could switch over to FO, but no one wanted them because they did not do meaningful/relevant tasks during their internship while the guy at the MM firm did relevant tasks and got an interview.
Experience VS Name (Originally Posted: 04/01/2008)
What I am curious about, given the nature of the market, and slowdown in deal flow, along with recent posts that it is better to get 5 $1 billion deals than 1 $5 billion deal. How will PE recruitment look going forward? As what I understood is that if IB experience is sold on your experience at your firm, in terms of deal execution/overall deal exposure. So if deal flow slows down at a BB are you better off at a boutique or mm to get the deal flow, even though they dont have the name (I don't mean being at Laz or Greenhill), or is the nature of being at goldman or MS a better sell for PE. So really the question is, is it better to have 50 smaller cap deals at a boutique, vs 5 large sized deals at BB type firm?
I do not have experience with PE recruiting, but putting myself in the recruiter's shoe, I suppose their decision is a function of the level of experience you gained for those 50 vs. 10 deals. But my guess would be that greater deal exposure would be preferred.
Coming from a brand-name shop will continue to draw more attention than coming from a lesser known MM bank.
Even if fewer deals get done, there is still a ton of relevant work experience that can be gained by working at a BB.
I'm not sure your example of 5 $1bn dollar deals vs. 1 $5bn dollar deal really coincides with your question. If the question is "given the current market environment, should I work at Blair/Sagent/HLHZ/etc. vs. a bulge if my ultimate end-goal is mid to large cap PE," then I would say no. While more deal experience in a variety of transactions is very good, many analysts at bulge bracket banks land jobs at top funds without closing a single deal before their interviews. Oftentimes, one large, relatively complex transaction is all that is needed to speak to. Additionally, never underestimate the importance of building relationships with senior bankers with contacts at buyside firms. A few phone calls can help you immensely.
Thats not say that if you truly enjoy the boutique culture that you won't get a good experience and land at a great shop in 2 years. I would definitely say it's significantly harder, no matter what the economic environment. And trust me, the bigger banks are moving downstream to smaller deals, and have been for some time.
I guess to look at it from my scenario, I am in Toronto, so it's not Blair/Sagent, it is other shops, but I am working at a boutique. SO I wonder whether 1 yr down the line I should move to a large CDN bank or a BB, vs getting a lot of small M&A deals, IPO's and even VC type seed investing deals is better for me to move to PE.
BB > MM if you want to get to a top PE or even a good PE. If you start out in MM banking, you will get MM PE jobs. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it is what it is. If it turns out you want to go to a smaller PE shop, you still can from a BB. However, it's very hard to get to a top PE place from a MM bank.
Nail on the head.
Folks coming out of MM or BB banks should feel fortunate to get MM PE jobs (if that's what they're looking for).
For all the talk about large-cap PE funds, less than 100 candidates (and probably closer to 60-75, depending on one's definition of fund size) per year will actually land jobs in the large-cap buyout world.
Coming from a BB certainly opens up a lot of doors at top shops.
I have however, seen many people from well known middle-markets land jobs with firms like Carlyle. It's certainly not IMPOSSIBLE to land one of these jobs from an MM
I'm not sure that "many" people from MM's land jobs at top-tier private equity firms. At least, I haven't seen that many. For example, I know Madison Dearborn has hired 1 or 2 guys in the past from Chicago-based boutiques like Blair, but Blair by no means is a "target" bank for them - the guy just happened to be very good (or knew the right people and aced his interviews). I'd be surprised to see more than a few former MM guys that work at Carlyle (in the buyout group, not the real estate or leveraged finance), Blackstone, KKR, etc. But by all means, if you can point me to their profiles, I'd be interested.
Value of a BB name on Resume (Originally Posted: 05/01/2014)
Given the following background (mine): non target UG ==> non target MBA ===> valuation consulting w/ mid tier consulting firm...
How much value would a BB (MS/GS) brand bring to the resume for the future?
Role is MO/BO doing internal valuation review of the BB's private equity investments. So still would have/develop relevant valuation skills.
Given the lack of prestige from schools and current firm, does BB brand make up for that? And would it open SIGNIFICANTLY MORE doors that current experience and skills cannot?
Depends on the group and your future goals. If you wanna go in IBD and have PWM, not much. If you wanna go in PWM and have PWM, huge!
@"Ambani" thank you for the input! The group at the BB is in their MO/BO doing valuation review on private equity investments. So would be similar skills I currently have, just more focused. Future goals is one of the following: PE/PE valuation/Corp Dev/Corp Finance. I like the role of the BB position, just the total comp is not there.
Yes, the brand names would be of help. Won't get you a job, but might stop the interviewer from tossing your resume at first glance. Won't open huge amount of doors, but sounds like it would help in your situation.
@"HFer_wannabe" that has been my trouble in deciding. I know it won't get me the future job, but if it will prevent the interviewer from tossing my resume to the side, it might be good to sacrifice short term $ for the long term. However, that short $ would be around 20 to 40% per year over two years.
Probably helpful to have for sure.
@"notthehospitalER" so even though the role at the BB is in their MO/BO, since it has relevant skills (valuation), the brand name would give a "stamp of approval" to future employers/recruiters?
It helps - A LOT. While many people on this forum will dismiss anything that's not front office, most people in the world and outside Wall Street (some even inside) see names like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, etc. and some sort of relevant experience (even if not client facing, but acquiring relevant skills) and they think you're legit.
How much does a BB name help for a resume? (Originally Posted: 01/08/2013)
Hey! I'm currently a sophomore student at a solid target looking to get into a BB IBD internship by the summer after my junior year. I have a good family friend who could take me in as an intern in PWM at one of the BB's. Despite that, would I be better off getting a banking internship at an MM bank or even 3rd-tier bank?
Yes, absolutely. Most of the people on this site would kill for a MM SA for their junior year summer, let alone sophomore. If you can get that, you're absolutely golden junior year recruiting.
best way to get noticed for IBD is to do IBD. If you have a sophomore summer internship at an even decent MM you'll get a ton of looks for junior year summer.
The thing is, though, that I'm also reconsidering ibanking. I started college really wanting to go into ibanking. However, with all the rules and regulations on top of a shitty economy, I think my optimal career choice may be better elsewhere. Does having an ibanking in general look good for anything business or finance related?
Yeah, I'm not thinking of doing the analyst->associate->VP->MD route at the bank. I'm just doing IB to hopefully get into HF or PE. Does anybody have a rough estimate of successful analysts who go on to lucrative hedge funds or private equity?
omg! take the MM offer! this is phenomenal for someone your year, god. dont patronize the struggling juniors out there that are dying for a MM while you're considering doing PWM over IBD haha
congrats though, very impressive
I know one person who did an NYC PWM internship at a BB his sophomore summer and networked his way into an IBD SA position at the same firm before OCR even started.
That said, the MM internship is amazing for a soph and may benefit you with a broader pool of firms come junior year.
NO! I actually didn't get a MM IBD haha. I was just wondering if I should be complacent with using my family friend connect for PWM BB and not need to exert so much effort (possibly at the expense of my school grades) in getting MM IBD.
If you can land an internship at a good MM or elite boutique, that's as good as BB. It doesn't necessarily mean that you'd be exerting less effort, especially if you look at firms in the range of evercore, greenhill, lazard
Definitely go PWM BB in my opinion, I have two friends who went that route this summer, interviewed at the end of the summer for IBD at the same firm, and entered this year with a summer internship already secured.
im sorry to say but i think this is such bad advice. dont mean to start a fight/arguement but really, this is not good advice at all. The risk doesnt make sense here to take, you should NOT bank/hope for internal mobility to the most competitive department of a BB (IBD) when you're NOT even FT, you're just an intern. What if he cant get the same banks IBD division? then what? then he has to do through OCR with JUST a PWM internship which will take him nowhere.
the MM internship not only is more relevant and is actual banking, but if he gets a MM offer or loves it, can stay or if not go through OCR again after with a MM internship which is VERY SOLID on a resume and will then get him BB interviews.
OP, please use the search function you'll see im correct. if you don't, well then you're lazy and dont want it bad enough. just my 2 cents. and gwolves, congrats to your friends but this isnt very common and super risky to plan on mobility w/in a firm to the most competitive division w/no back up plan/relevant experience if you cant move
Qui in cupiditate dolore fugiat placeat. Fugit laborum dolorem labore eos magnam. Harum dolore amet consequatur omnis doloremque voluptas. Commodi beatae natus delectus. Nulla sit neque et sunt est.
Iusto illum quia et possimus quaerat. Adipisci asperiores enim sit nisi possimus et distinctio. Rerum quis asperiores animi est ullam fugiat. Et dolorem non nesciunt non doloremque.
Nihil unde est earum fugiat nihil et. Tempora assumenda dolorem molestiae esse libero. Quos tempora quia earum et sunt libero magni. Consequatur qui optio omnis deserunt.
Repellendus quibusdam quisquam rerum in aliquam. Nam eum voluptates dolor illum quas quis. Reiciendis incidunt ducimus accusamus dolorum doloremque quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestiae hic quo facere error. Occaecati ut beatae at incidunt explicabo molestiae velit facere. Repellat distinctio odio aut sed aut molestiae quia. Deserunt qui cupiditate architecto. Et voluptatum voluptas eligendi quaerat. Et vel accusamus vero ipsa.
Tempore ut nostrum quidem autem facilis et. Quod placeat molestiae in dolor earum. Eaque similique quia assumenda accusantium. Error cupiditate placeat et est voluptatem quam. Beatae officiis rem ea.