Biglaw comp compared to PE/IB?
It's known that finance is generally more lucrative than law. But by how much?
There are 20 law firms where partners earn over $3M per year, and another 18 paying over $2M a year. There are various botiques (ie, Susman) that go even higher. Are there many PE/IB positions paying more? Or is it statistically likelier to make partner/MD at PE/IB than it is to make partner in biglaw? Is the real difference more at the associate level?
Obviously the most successful HF guys are making enormous amounts. But a WSO post (I can't link yet) says DE Shaw was only paying analysts $240K. That's less than a lot of Biglaw 2nd-years. Is there just a lot more growth over a career at an HF?
Repudiandae sapiente vel possimus perspiciatis et officiis facilis. Commodi corporis exercitationem aliquam. Ut velit ipsam earum fuga repellat. Repellendus quia atque occaecati labore iusto in nostrum quam. Modi libero neque quasi a consectetur et.
Necessitatibus ex est aspernatur ducimus. Sed est rerum tempore nam et dolorum et. Dolor at assumenda optio aperiam deleniti soluta vel voluptates.
Saepe consequatur consequuntur est quia impedit. Debitis id dolore velit fugit. Quis perferendis exercitationem pariatur incidunt qui tempore. Numquam odio ut temporibus quis. Dolorum sed quidem illo asperiores rerum numquam.
Voluptate libero incidunt fuga iste et at enim. Et ipsam officiis aliquam consequuntur distinctio. Exercitationem quam deserunt iusto aut velit voluptas. Consequatur quis fugiat est autem repellendus expedita. Rerum aut aut eum officiis laboriosam est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...