Ummm... Did you actually read the article? Citi is the highest paid based on these criteria due to its debt underwriting business, which comes as a result of its balance sheet. Just going off of M&A advisory fees, Citi is number four, which isn't all that impressive given how many bankers it has under its roof and its ability to provide such a shitload of financing to clients.

 

Can anyone explain to me how universal banks such as JPM, Citi use their balance sheets to issue debt? I've always heard that big balance sheet helps these banks when it comes to debt issuance. However, I never understood how it works in practice.

Also, #4 in M&A, #3 in equity (after GS/MS), and #1 in bonds for Citi are not bad at all. Clearly, these numbers are better than those of its competitors excluding GS/MS.

How come Lehman is behind CS in every single category?

 

Citi/JPM can underwrite more debt (and afford to take on more risk) because of their huge balance sheet.

Firms like Citi/JPM are strong in financing, which in turn can bring in M&A deals as well (stapled financing). That's their competitive advantage - leveraging their balance sheet.

Bear in mind that Lehman is weak on the global scale. It is only strong in the US, in Europe and Asia, its presence is small.

 

Not entirely. Underwriting would mean that they incur the initial risk of buying over the debt, and then finding ways of getting the debt off their books by selling it at a higher price.

Citi/JPM can do higher volumes of underwriting because they can take on more risks and do more financing deals (buy more debt).

 

Citi is huge in terms of people as well, which is another reason why they're number four. Someone should research profitability per banker, as I believe that would be a much more accurate measure of the quality of the business and the experience one could get as an analyst there.

 
Best Response

I agree with Citi being a fee machine. But you have to consider they have more people on the ground too and they have an advantage when working with clients (balance). All I think everyone is saying is don't discount the revenue / banker metric when evaluating firms because it'll have a large bearing on how much deal flow you get to work on in your analyst stint.

Look at UBS for example -- top 5 M&A fees; but like somewhere between 6-8 or so in Thomson league tables. They tend to do a lot of sole advisory jobs for their big deals (ie. sole advisor to Univision; Harrah's (kinda had stephens on there); Petco. etc.

At the end of the day banking is a fee generating business and this should be the most important metric. League tables and size of deals are important as well to guage how often you can get on those industry changing deals.

Looking at these rankings should help you understand why some of the more senior guys on this board always talk about a certain group of banks being respected for advisory work even though they don't dominate league tables.

 

Saepe error minus eaque modi. In officiis est blanditiis voluptatem commodi illo dolor. Quia iure dicta deserunt est velit et. Molestiae qui adipisci labore.

Ipsam dolor nesciunt quaerat aut et sunt. Provident quisquam cupiditate qui dolorum assumenda voluptatem. Quia et minima consequuntur modi explicabo. Explicabo minus facilis vel cum sunt vitae impedit. Molestiae qui nulla modi provident qui aut vel. Fugit et culpa dolorum in doloremque. Recusandae est repellendus facilis omnis.

Voluptatem cum assumenda non provident eius ipsum. Et et quis libero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”