Bonds vs. Loans

What are some of the key differences between bonds and loans? Is it primarily that bonds are tradeable on the market whereas loans aren't? Also, are there any differences in seniority (or secured / unsecured) at all? I've searched this on google but was hoping to get some better clarity from the community here. Any insight would be appreciated

 
Most Helpful

Should be a section on M&I guide on this. 

But generally (may differ for certain cases): 

- Bonds - fixed. Loans - floating

- Bonds - require public ratings. Loans - don't necessarily need to esp for MM< companies

- HY Bonds - call protection 2/3 years (5NC2, 7NC3). Loans - Soft call protection 6-12m.

- Bonds - tradeable securities. Loans - much more illiquid (bid/ask prices on illiquid lev fin loans lol)

I may have forgotten to write up a few more

- No significant difference in seniority - mostly they are issued pari, unless indicated otherwise, and terms have converged to the point where they are more similar than different. 

 

Thanks so much for your comment +1. Could you provide some insight into how bonds and loans fit within bank debt (revolver, term loans, etc.) and high yield debt (senior notes, sub notes, etc.)? Because of the names of the different types of debt, I was originally under the impression that bank debt was the same as loans, and high yield debt was the same as bonds. You mentioned they're issued pari passu so does that mean there are "revolver bonds" or "senior notes that are loans" - how does that work lol

 

Sure - although with the caveat that I'm still junior so the following may not apply in all situations. Also Europe based (US may be different).

Generally the revolver is held by banks primairly only for working capital purposes - usually you'll not expect it to be drawn (but obviously in covid companies did draw them). In Europe you'll want the RCF to be super senior ideally - this in effect means you'll get priority in enforcement (payment is pari). Generally most terms align with the senior unsecureds (whether it's bonds / loans), with the exception of a springing financial covenant (i.e. a leverage covenant applicable when you draw above a certain % of the revolver), and associated EBITDA cures.

The senior unsecured is generally either TLB / Senior notes. Both are generally held by institutional investors (AMs, pension funds, etc.), with the exception that the TLB market has a higher depedency on the CLO market and bonds on fund inflows/outflows. From experience HYBs are issued primarily for general corporate purposes, while loans are preferred for acquistions. Banks (except those that are yield-hungry) don't generally hold a portion of these and will try to seek to underwrite the majority of it but will hold on to the RCF as no investor will want to hold the RCF

The subs are generaly an extension of the above - they can be done either through an intercreditor (agreeing to be suboridnated), or just simply structural (i.e issued at the parent without guarantees). Typically because there's limitation on how mch senior debt you can issue (too much means dilution of value which makes investors uncomfortable) - you will then have a sub layer if that's not available.

To be clear - bank debt doesn't mean the same as loans as there are institutional TLBs that are held primarily by investors. High yield debt generally refers to the rating and encompasses both loans and bonds. No revolver bonds exist as most will be a bullet repayment structure, and senior notes means senior bonds. 

 

Let's break down the difference into the major categories, before going into the specific parameters.

- Sizing

- Seniority

- Security

- Use of proceeds

- Public ratings requirement

- Tenor

- Amortization/prepayment

- Covenant structure

- Pricing

- Lender/investor base

I work in leveraged finance. Shoot me any question on specifics, and I'll address them individually.

 

Consectetur magni aperiam rerum eos sint rem autem sit. Corrupti voluptas occaecati perferendis cumque eius recusandae in. Sed quo ad ut. Voluptatem et porro ea nisi.

Quasi non magni est qui est a. Et et est ut voluptates maiores. Consectetur ipsa ipsa qui in error.

Nostrum consequatur voluptas quam vero. Minima est cum facilis fuga error nostrum alias. Sint error mollitia in eius tempore inventore. Et doloremque quis est sequi aliquid qui. Laudantium aut ea animi officiis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”