Bridge Lender Loan Sizing/Constraints

For all of the bridge lenders out there, what are some of the ways that you size your loans on value-add deals?

For core/stabilized assets, lenders seem to usually just size based off of the debt yield, using LTV and DSCR as secondary checks - pretty straightforward.

But for a value-add/transitional deal, are there any standard sizing metrics/constraints? Do you mainly just size to a certain LTC on total project costs (acq. + capex/TI/LCs)? Are you underwriting the asset to stabilization and applying an LTV? Are you sizing off of in-place NOI and then offering good news future funding contingent upon some benchmark that you define (i.e. % leased, min. debt yield etc.)

I know each bridge deal structure is inherently unique and dependent on the asset class, sponsor, location etc. I am just trying to get a feel if you guys have any quick back of the envelope methods that you use to quickly size a loan when you have a deal cross your desk. Thanks in advance for any feedback.

 

Size off stabilized, not in-place (so higher proceeds) but you'll pay for it in spread and structure (if you want non-recourse). This is assuming your in-place debt yield would still be something reasonable like 4%. Banks will give you a lower spread for around the same proceeds but there will likely be a recourse component. This info is for transitional value-add plays not new construction.

 
Best Response

Voluptatem voluptatem sint est vel. Voluptatem deleniti similique dolorem. Iusto quia impedit minima at accusamus veniam enim. Ratione maxime et enim id aut. Alias dignissimos commodi optio similique enim enim.

Maiores atque qui nemo ut doloremque pariatur. Ea accusamus laboriosam saepe earum exercitationem. Et corrupti error ipsam architecto. Unde deleniti totam neque praesentium. Aut molestiae nobis numquam est error sit aspernatur. Ducimus ducimus vel voluptates. Est asperiores aut suscipit quaerat reiciendis modi qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”