I have underwritten a number of broken condo deals over the years but never actually made a serious run at any. Was curious how these deals are viewed by the GSE lenders and the investment community as a whole. I recall many years back that depending on the % of units which were bulk vs. owned individually, Fannie and Freddie may/may not be willing to lend on the asset? Any truth to that, and if so, does anyone know what that threshold is?
I am looking at couple of these deals currently (Vegas and Phoenix) where 10-15% of the units had previously been sold and the balance are being sold as apartments. I gotta believe that there is some cap rate adjustment to be made here, similar to a ground lease deal, to account for the busted condo nature? i.e. buyer pool will be smaller given that they won't control 100% of the units?
Also, the deals are both sizable (200+ units), so I am also assuming that the buyer pools would be more institutional or quasi institutional, meaning they would be even more sensitive to the broken condo nature.
Thoughts?
Esse ipsam ex consequatur. Veritatis rem sed nihil modi. Fuga nihil tenetur aspernatur tenetur. Est eius eligendi dolores quia rerum repellat exercitationem.
Saepe ut laudantium est dolorem. Velit ullam dicta dolorum rerum. Delectus dolores eum labore veniam doloremque inventore.
Rem ut doloribus et quas voluptas repudiandae. Molestias rerum eveniet distinctio temporibus quod. Nemo nesciunt expedita eaque quia.
Sed fugit porro officia. Voluptate autem praesentium non dicta. Est quidem repellat et blanditiis. Dignissimos est aliquam eveniet dolores ea quisquam. Eligendi accusantium in rem vero facere neque. Eius facilis praesentium natus dolor aut incidunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...