Can PE Firms Distribute their Own Debt?

Recently, as PE firms have had difficulty gaining financing, some firms like Blackstone have suggested that they are trying to bypass the Ibanks and syndicate debt directly to buyers like hedge funds. I was wondering what people on the sell side and buy side think the likelihood of this actually happening is. I can see how the large PE firms would have cost saving and more flexibility to raise financing, but it also seems like the expertise of banks and their relationships throughout the financial markets are crucial for syndication of debt. Do you think PE firms should circumvent the traditional system?

 
Best Response

Avista did it on one HFs, not sure which ones. H&F has done a couple deals combining "non traditional lenders" and HFs - barcap, RBS greenwich capital, GE, Farallon (unsurprisingly), GSO, etc. The guys who founded GSO were doing buyout financings at CS before going out on their own, and with Blackstone buying GSO there's some potential to put together financing for MM deals there. I think the most nimble firms will be able to pull of putting together their own debt on small deals where they can get enough binding commitments up front, but as soon as you get north of to 1B I don't think it's practical to cobble together it all up front so long as sellers are still insisting on committed financing. I know there was some talk last summer with the KKR ipo docs that they were going to build a capital markets business. Could large buyout firms do what banks do and write commitments for the debt finance themselves in advance of the MA and then place it prior to close? Sure, but that would take them setting aside some amount of capital for underwriting (whether firm capital or raised from investors) and I think after seeing the banks get burned this bad in the current crunch no one will want that much risk concentrate in those few hands.

 

For right now it can only be done for small - midcap deals. If you need to tap a large instiutional or pro rata base though, you have to go through the normal bank process.

Sponsors have been doing this for awhile for arranging mezz / 2nd lien pieces, where they will drag one or two investors through the diligence process. No way is Blackstone going to be able to bring 200+ investors though data rooms and management presentations though.

 

Direct debt placements of this sort are nothing new - often times, the hedge fund(s) will turn around and try to syndicate a portion of these debt securities anyway. As Ginntonic pointed out, the traditional third-party syndication process will continue to serve larger and more senior placements though, since this would just be a headache for financial sponsors.

It's not a question of whether sponsors could place their own debt, but rather why they would ever want to spend their time doing so. Aside from niche placements, it doesn't make much sense.

 

Running a debt syndication takes time and money. Banks keep a large in house staff of people with contacts and time on their hands to do this. Where is the value for a PE shop that won't be distributing debt all the time to pay for this infrastructure. Sure, for a one off deal they can call up their friends and syndicate some debt.

You might as well ask, can they do all their own M&A advisory, IPO themselves, etc, etc. They can, but it doesn't necessarily make sense. Paying the fee to the bank who can build and maintain the infrastructure necessary to do these thing and to keep a small team to sanity check or run first approximations is all they need.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

Sit saepe natus fuga. Vel in atque aut placeat et. Dolorum necessitatibus qui nulla rerum sed voluptatem id. Fugiat rem aliquam numquam placeat odio ut nostrum. Reprehenderit quos tempora non ut voluptas quia necessitatibus vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”