Can someone explain the math here?

Here is the problem from BIWS: The buyer is worth $1 billion, has 100 million shares outstanding, and
its current share price is $10.00. It wants to issue 10 million shares to acquire the
seller for $100 million.
But if the market believes that the seller is only worth $80 million rather than
$100 million, the buyer’s share price might fall to $9.81 (implying a total value of
$1.08 billion) to reflect this lower value.

I am confused because based on this math, the seller is still receiving 9.81*10mm, which means the seller receives 98.1 million dollars despite the market valuing it at 80 million? Why?

 

I am confused b/c in the same BIWS guide, it says: A buyer pays $100 million for the seller in an all-­‐‑stock deal, but a day later the market decides that it’s only worth $50 million. What happens?

and the answer is: Depending on the deal structure, the seller would effectively only receive half of what it had originally negotiated.

in my original post, the seller does not receive half of what they originally negotiated. They received 99%.

 
Most Helpful

Goodwill has more to do with book value than market value, though you're right about paying a premium in the hopes of achieving synergies.

The example shows what happens when a large buyer acquires a relatively smaller target and values the target more than the market. The logic:

Buyer believes its worth $1B alone and target would add $100MM of value if acquired, bringing its total net worth to $1.1B. Buyer says to seller, "we believe the portion of value you'd contribute to the combined company would be $100MM, or 1/11th of our total $1.1B. So we will issue you shares that total 1/11th of the new combined company."

The seller accepts, believing the value of 1/11th of the combined company is worth more than 100% of its own company as a standalone. It accepts the risk that the market value of its shares will fluctuate.

Because these shares are publicly traded, the market weighs in on the deal. If the market only believes the acquired company adds $80MM in value, it will value the combined company at $1.08B.

Now, instead of: $1B/100MM shares = $10/share Or what the company hoped: $1.1B/110MM shares = $10/share We have instead: $1.08B/110MM shares = $9.81/share

So the seller's 10MM shares fell from $100MM to $98.1MM. It didn't fall all the way to $80MM because it also got 1/11th ownership of the legacy company, which the market still values at $1B.

Put another way, the seller expected to receive: 1/11th of the legacy buyer @ $1B = $90.9MM +1/11th of its company @ $100MM = $9.1MM =$100MM

Instead, it got: 1/11th of the legacy buyer @ $1B = $90.9MM +1/11th of its company @ $80MM = $7.2MM =$98.1MM

 

this makes a lot of sense, but can you explain why in the other example, the author says the seller can expect to receive half of what it negotiated? I will repost below:

A buyer pays $100 million for the seller in an all---stock deal, but a day later the market decides that it's only worth $50 million. What happens?

and the answer is: Depending on the deal structure, the seller would effectively only receive half of what it had originally negotiated.

 

Iure qui aliquam saepe quis dolores labore vel. Unde a velit et ab sit voluptatem natus.

Autem animi expedita illo similique natus a. Quaerat labore aut minus sed nihil.

Repudiandae natus rerum nesciunt quasi vitae eveniet amet et. Cumque et maiores culpa sed. Sapiente praesentium quia ea. Fugiat et ducimus accusamus eius tenetur. Pariatur alias perspiciatis beatae in sequi quia asperiores quos.

Dolor iusto repudiandae at qui iusto. Magni assumenda dolorem aliquid enim. Similique aut voluptatem quibusdam dicta. Voluptate qui at voluptates deleniti ratione impedit. Laboriosam vel quod porro exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”