Can you tell the difference between a 6 and a 10??
I can't tell you how many times I heard someone say "she is a solid 9", "she is a bombshell 10", and then found out it really should be a 6 or 7.
Blake Lively is a 9, Ivanka Trump is a 6. Agree?
Trending Content
| +95 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 24 | 4h | |
| +37 | Interviews Are So Fake | 24 | 2h | |
| +33 | 2024 UK Election - Tories finished? | 20 | 13h | |
| +29 | Being Christian in investment banking | 14 | 7h | |
| +26 | Is my boss gaslighting me? | 3 | 6d | |
| +24 | Non-Competes Banned | 16 | 59m | |
| +22 | Ideas for things to do with a free semester before starting ft? | 9 | 1d | |
| +20 | Sabotaging Peers to Get Ahead? | 34 | 3d | |
| +18 | Best NYC neighborhood for single 30M | 12 | 1d | |
| +17 | Moelis has the cutest Analysts? | 4 | 4h |
Career Resources
Blake lively is not a 9 lol
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think Ivanka is better looking than Blake Lively but what's great is that we're all allowed to think different things.
I disagree. You are not allowed to think this.
Your view will likely change over time. For her age, Jennifer Aniston, has it all going on. Most women do not look like her at 51. She must be doing something right or has very good genes. She is also worth about 200 million.
A couple of my faves are Katharine Mcphee and Selena Gomez.
I just looked up Kathrine Mcphee, apparently she’s into older dudes, which works in your favor.
I think that I am too young for her, haha. I had such a crush on her when she tried out out for American Idol a long time ago.
Beauty is subjective. What looks a 10 to me might be a 7 to you. IMO Blake Lively is more beautiful than Ivanka, but she isn’t a 9. Another example, Ive never found Angelina Jolie to be as stunning as everyone says she is, she’s still beautiful just not all that IMO. On the other hand Alessandra Ambrosia is gorgeous much more beautiful than Angelina.
Alessandra is my girl, +1
Diminishing marginal utility as the girls get hotter... pick someone who’s above a certain hotness threshold and treats you well and makes you a better person, an 8 who’s a good human being who wants to see you succeed is light years better than a 10 who’s a mentally ill leach
Of course, you’d be an idiot to go for looks alone (for a serious relationship anyway) girls who have nothing but looks get old after a while.
Words of wisdom here, although my threshold is 6.
There's no point of comparison when two people are linked to many different things now than their appearances in your mind. (however, do search Ivanka at Wharton, that was a hottie if I've seen one in college)
Although I don't mean to generalise, I've noticed that a 10 is the stuck-up bitch that plays hard to get. A 6/7 is the girl that rides you like a train and puts your dick to sleep for a week. A slutty 6 is much better than a stuck-up 7.
I don’t about you, but I like pretty girls with issues, like daddy issues and shit. They’re the best, I’ve only dated one girl like that for like 6 months, but damn... she was an easy 10 and absolutely insane.
Y’all are weird
More like crazy
Why? This is what young guys do...
.
Guys often grossly inflate ratings and most girls end up in the 6-9 range. If you think about it, that’s pretty high and most people likely aren’t in the upper bracket of appearance.
Of course looks are subjective so everyone will rate differently but the guy rating every girl a 7 probably doesn’t have very particular preferences and would settle for most girls, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing either.
Very subjective. I’m honestly surprised by how many people are ok with butterfaces. In no way does a girl with the face of a horse or another dude become an 8 just because she isn’t fat. Have some standards kids
.
Haters lol.
? They both look extremely photoshopped
This was a screenshot from a 10 min video. I know you can photoshop videos too nowadays but I doubt it did much here.
Anyway it further proves my point that there is a material gap between 6 and 9, even if both are photoashopped.
They do be looking photoshopped. I prefer natural beauty, not too much filter/makeup. Anyone can go up 2-3 points on the 1-10 scale with makeup and shit.
If this is the best you can do for a 9, you are not looking in the right places.
Well... beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. I guess to this dude a 5.5/10 is a 9. Lmao. Either that or he doesn’t get out much.
What??
Lol all you monkey sitting haters.....at least provide some photos. Don't give me names of celebrities as if they don't have the most tailored and professional makeups in the world.
girl on the left is a 4
girl on the right is a 5
what crank you smokin?
I'm smoking this crack called "i need to move out of my city" cuz I never seen anyone here better looking than the chick on the right lol...
Nah people just don't like the fact that you're trying to impose your version of beauty and get people to conform to it?
OG Authorian Chinese move btw.
Look up Dilraba. This Uyghur girl is a 9+. If you don't agree you need to go to aesthetics re-education camps.
You just proved the above commenter’s point about gross over scaling where most girls are put in 6-9. What you have here is a 3 and a 5.
Lets turn this thread into something else!...
Here are some easy ones we can all agree on:
Emma Watson (Deathly Hallows part 1) - 8
Margot Robbie (Wolf of WS) - 9, that one scene is still common yank bait.
Cindy Vortex - 9
Megan Fox (1st Transformers) - 9.5 , millennial twinks idolized this wench for half a decade b/c of that movie.
Jennifer Lawrence (Hunger Games series) - 6 , very overrated in my opinion.
Sophia Bush (One Tree hill seasons 1-6) - 7.5 , underrated and her voice is cute.
Alexandra Daddario (True Detective) - 9.5
Emily Ratajkowski - 9.5 (don't argue, this is a lock)
Melissa McCarthy - T H I C C - 1
The following are debatable:
Keira Knightley (Pi o C #1) - 8 (acquired taste for some)
Scarlett Johansen (Pre 2016) - 8 , good all around until the dike haircut and ugly tattoos
Kendall Jenner (present day) - 8.5 , small titts but top tier legs
Kate Upton (pre 2017) - 8.5 , massive juggs
Mila Kunis (friends with benefits) - 7.5
Anna Kendrick (Pitch Perfect 1) - 8 (tier 2 redhead behind Daddario)
Amy Schumer - 2
Sandra Bullock (Blind Side) - 7 , oldie but goodie
Carla Gugino (Entourage) - 6.5
Malin Akerman (Billions) - 5.5
*On the argument above*
Young Blake Lively, early gossip girl seasons, easily 8+, honestly a 9-10 if you were really into the show.
Ivanka trump is so corporate it can be hard to see her as sexy but she's a solid 8 in my book, decreasing with age. Guess I give Blake the slight nod.
Honestly ratings for actresses/models are a little more strict but would love to hear some other takes!
I’ve never found Daddario attractive, she’s like a 4 to me. Emma Watson is not an 8, she has the cute step sister vibe, she’s like a 6.5. Jennifer Lawrence is overrated but push her up to a 7. Basically agree on everything else, perhaps some lady’s on there could be pushed up or down by 1 or 2 points, but essentially agree with the list.
Sb for the well though out reply.
Her eyes scare me. Idk why they had Matt Bomer chase her in White Collar.
Agreed. But that +1 point for that accent.
Not sure why this is in the “debatable” category. Pls fix
Wait did you just say Scarlett Johansen = Anna Kendrick?
How are you mentioning Entourage and not factoring in Emmanuelle Chriqui? Beauty is subjective and she is a hard 9 for me, but does anyone think she is less than a solid 8? She’s an absolute missle.
That is true I forgot to mention her and you absolutely correct, she is a hard 9 and it isn't debatable. Complete smoke show and a top celebrity crush for me.
Some disagreements here and there but this is a good list
Damn, y’all really only think white girls are hot lol
I don't necessarily think it is a race thing, but it does play a role. The Western countries still have majority White people (especially if you account for Europe).
More settled now in life - but honestly, if I had met a beautiful black/brown/(any other race) girl earlier in my life - I would have gone out with her. But the likelihood of that scenario just isn't very high if you grow up in White countries with White friends and White colleagues. Religious aspects also have a say in this (chances are the people in your place of worship look like you).
But I have to admit that race plays a much bigger role in dating than elsewhere. Among hundreds of friends I have in multiple countries, I don't think I have ever heard that any guy would be willing to date and/or marry a black woman. there are mixed-race marriages and relationships, but black/brown doesn't seem like a possibility for many reasons unknown to me (guessing it is family values, religion, society, and more).
No one is a 10 except VS models. That's facts. Anything below is subjective.
Facts.
No one is a 10.
There are 8.9s, 9.0s, 9.1s, 9.2s, 9.3s, 9.4s, 9.5s. There is a beauty asymptote below 10. The perfect female does not exist. Everyone has flaws.
I agreed with this until I saw Gal Gadot.
If I had to show a person one thread that proves WSO is basically Reddit, it would be this one
We have more class here.
Nah, it is just boys having some fun.
https://instagram.com/anllela_sagra
Is that your girl?
haha no I wish - thought she was pretty hot - she has the perfect body - chiseled
peak Blake Lively (gossip girl days) - 8.95
peak Ivanka Trump - 8.37
peak Margo Robbie (Tarzan 2016) - 9.96
Ivanka Trump has been rumored to have had a nose, chin and tit job. Not fair to compare as she had some help. I appreciate natural beauty and features. But she is still nice to look at. Solid 8.5.
Lol they’ve all had work done
A lot of people with lots of money have work done. Take a look at Lori Greiner and Robert Herjavec from the Shark Tank. I have no proof that they have had work done but Lori looks more youthful today than 10 years ago. Robert has more hair today than 10 years ago. For me, it is more impressive when someone does it naturally.
After 6-10 drinks they all look the same. If I hug her and can touch my 10 fingers together, she’s a 10.
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
This rating stuff is so dumb. Everyone you guys say are 6's or 7's are actually 9's, 9.5, 10. If this is meant to put the entire population into deciles, you have to think about literally everyone on the planet. Nearly everyone mentioned above are actresses, insta models, etc. They are all 10's, they are literally the top 10% of the population in looks if not the top 1-2%.
Also very curious to hear your own self-assessment of your looks based on the same criteria you apply to others...
Rating stuff s dumb, but it’s also fun. In real life, once you get to know a girl, she can become more attractive based on her personality. There’s also plenty of girls who aren’t models/actresses that are very attractive. I’m probably a 7/10 in terms of looks, think if I can drop a few pounds, can be an 8 easy.
this is very true. think about the millions of people who don't post and don't live off of their looks
:P
Have you... never heard of subjectivity or subjective beauty standards? Not everyone views beauty the same. Someone may think a person is a 6 while the other thinks a 10.
Brittany Snow with red hair, dear lord that takes the cake for me
im only into thicciez w/ daddy issues
Scale is fucked. You need to use a normal distribution homies. My only hard and fast rule is that you can only be less than a 2 if you're fat. But the image with the two chicks are not above average. high 4 to low 5 at most lol. Ivanka is definitely more than 1 standard deviation from the mean in terms of attractiveness. Std. deviation on a 10 point scale should be about 1.5 if you wanna capture the whole population so Ivanka should be about 7-8 at a minimum. Blake lively might be a tiny bit more attractive but not that much so solid 8.
This is so interesting. I've always wondered whether guys rate girls on a scale of 'hotness' eg insta girls or on 'beauty' eg Christy Turlington when she was young. Or is there no difference?
https:// www.pinterest. co.uk/pin/ 419045940330647555/
There are very few 10s out there.
I can only think of a few off the top of my head. There is a big difference between a 10 and a 9 in my opinion. 9's are any beautiful women that have achieved peak beauty standards. But in my book a ten has to have something else other than just a pretty face, they have to be successful in other ways.
Alica Schmidt- a German sprinter
Neri Oxman- Professor at MIT, also Bill Ackman's wife
Jutta Leerdam- Dutch speed skater
Gal Gadot- actress
But I might have a type, German and Israeli women.
Neri Oxman looks like a mom or a college professor, wtf are you smoking
"When I went to bed at 2 she was a 10, and when I woke up at 10 she was a 2."
-Willie Nelson
When I got drunk, she was a 10. After the hangover, she turned out to be a 1...
This thread is the best example how everyone views beauty in different ways.
My flavor of the week would be https://www.instagram.com/juuleechkaa (if anyone knows enough Russian to find her real name, I would appreciate a PM!)
And I don't even like girls with dark hair.
meh...
I know, I know... she is an Ignite girl. which probably means she was in an orgy with Dan B. already...
.
Stop the cap.
🧢
Lies.
Thing is there's so much make-up on her there's no saying how her face looks in real life. Although to be fair, most comparisons on this thread are also based on photos with heavy make-up. On a proforma make-up adjusted basis, sure she's a 9. Once you strip away all the shit, probably closer to a 7.
And also: it is far more difficult for a woman to be perceived as "attractive" through a 2-dimensional, digital channel than in real life. the women we see on social media, dating websites and youtube are losing their IRL advantage of 3 dimensions (plus pheromones, character, personality, etc). Therefore the "extreme" outliers with extreme looks (ie curves), makeup, dress code etc have more clout. ("attractive" hear means the superficial variant based on looks, since that is mostly all we see through IG et all). I had dates with online-9s that looked really different IRL.
A regular, great girl we would like IRL might be perceived differently because she doesn't photograph well. All these models we see have professional hair, makeup, photographers and perfect lighting and really good editing.
Dupe
Plastic is fun. i like barbie dolls and yes you're a boomer.
Nice clapback, enjoy your Barbie dolls, I’ll enjoy what I have.
I have such a hard time telling if a girl today is actually naturally beautiful or just good with instagram.
for me, it's penelope cruz, elizabeth hurley, gal gadot, and queen rania of Jordan (all below my wife of course, who is in her own right a mediterranean knockout)
You're all a bunch of simps and cucks anyway, stop thinking about girl "models" and get back to formatting your "models"
Attractiveness is all related to the protrusion of the maxilla bone in the skull, not subjective in the slightest, nor is it genetic for that matter. The sooner y'all recognize this the sooner you'll know how the world works.
Also that dentistry is a scam i.e. treating the symptoms not the causes. I could open this can of worms but idk if wso is ready. If you research this you can't unknow it.
A scam? In the same way a cardiologist treats a heart attack and doesn’t prevent it?
(Start up an OT thread if you like )
Not exactly. If a heart attack was 100% in all cases preventable through proper lifestyle then I'd say yes. Although an argument could be made that there will always be a market catering to people's laziness and incompetence e.g. fat loss pills.
curious about your dentistry comments, are you talking about Ehrlich's research on the jaw, jaw expanding devices like homeoblock, and the like?
Those are related but I'm primary talking about oral posture and the works of John Mew and his son Mike Mew. Look up orthotropics.
You have cases of identical twins at birth, one treated with orthotropics and the other conventional orthodontics and braces: the differences speak for themselves:
What the fuck can’t tell if you’re trolling or not
I'm 100% serious. Archeologists find that pretty much all ancient human skulls pre-agricultural revolution have no teeth crowding or crooked teeth, the same is found with many indigenous tribes today. Crooked teeth and long, narrow faces are the result of poor oral and overall posture and softer diet, meaning facial bones and musculature don't develop as much. Although you can make changes with time, according to Wolff's law bones are not static and they change shape over time given long-term forces acting on them. An extreme case is Stephen Hawking, since his facial muscles atrophied and the bones had no forces to counteract gravity, so his facial bones literally melted downward over time. Another example is stroke victims who lose function over half their facial muscles. Over time, it's shown that the skeletal structure under the afflicted area deforms. Also why mouth breathers have ugly long faces.
In addition to orthotropic, the YouTube channel Things I've Learned has a good video on it.
Long story short - perfect models aren't somehow genetically gifted - their faces just look how they're supposed to. Everyone else is just varying degrees of deformed. Long faces and crooked teeth are purely a symptom of the modern lifestyle.
Wild comments coming from someone I suspect is around a 4
Edit: whoops wrong person
A lot of the disparity comes from different points of reference. For instance, I have a good friend who is substantially less successful with women than I am. He consistently rates every woman we see substantially higher than I do (I joke that to adjust to his scale I should just add 1.5 to everything). I think this is due to the fact that in his "universe" of women, an "objective" 8 is about as high as he'll ever go, therefore he inflates her rating to a 9-10. A theory that I can't prove is that this is broadly applicable - men who are less successful with women rate all women as more attractive, and those who are highly successful rate women as less attractive (relative to a mean).
This is quite the opposite from what I’ve seen with some bros IMO. A lot of the ones that don’t get lucky often are by far the pickiest ones with women, and I think it stems from maybe bitterness from not getting pussy or trying to convince themselves the “grapes are sour.”
the 0-10 scale is archaic, y'all need to adapt to the binary scale.
Every woman is either a 0, or a 1. Yes or no. Would or would not. At the end of the day that's what it comes down to boys. Anything more granular than that is subjective and inefficient.
Margot robbie is married to the most generic looking dude, so one can assume that most of the dudes on this site have a shot with her lmao
ha, I didn't know that. He does look pretty generic actually, I know two guys who look a lot like him.
Margot Robbie isn’t even hot anymore.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B689UOeDtSj/?igshid=1vjbrfnqw3smq
Funny thing about this whole thread is that I can imagine women on similar message board (ie. UterusOasis.com) rating you all a 6 or under. Look in the mirror and really think what women rank you at before you start calling a 6 or 7. I betcha that 6 probably things some of you are 4s. As someone above said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyones 10 is different.
Emily Rat should not be anything over a 6, imo.
I'd nominate barbara palvin, meghan markle (suits) as solid 9-9.5
The thing is, the rating will always depend on your crowd or lack thereof. If you're a sig chi bro whos evaluating a new kappa chick yes you might be able to come to a consensus with regards to how hot the chick is based on everyone's opinion. And I get that the group opinion sways the majority most of the time but picture yourself without that counsel, you're more likely prone to rate the chick higher or lower based on your real opinion. And through my convos with the girl that seems to be a pretty common thing with chicks too. At the end of the day, you'll easily be able to decide intrinsically who factors as an awful broad or a 10 in your mind based on your preference. Pretty important to remind yourself that it's super subjective and that there is a distinction to be made between what the boys call a 6 or 10 and what you consider a 6 or 10. No use coming to an online board and trying to reassure yourself what really works for you
One thing’s for sure is Lena Dunham is a feral hog
The scale is an illusion, an illusion made up by 12 year old boys who have never even talked to a girl.
Beauty, is how you make other people feel.
I've met women, who were objectively not 9's, but whose personalities made you not care. Above a certain value on looks are the least interesting thing about a person. Are they smart, kind, good natured, funny? Who needs more than a "6" with any 1-2 of those. You need physical attraction, but as you get older the mental attraction is what becomes most important, people get more interesting.
Ivanka Trump is like a female Hulk lol.
Interesting virtually all women mentioned here have been of caucasian descent. Does race play a role in attractiveness to y'all?
Quia doloremque quasi perferendis delectus. Nisi eaque nulla hic laborum eos dolores.
Et pariatur dolor deserunt et ut illo quaerat. Temporibus voluptas maxime tempore odio debitis aut. Soluta et magnam non esse occaecati sunt. Facere dolores dolor et dolorum cum nihil quis sapiente. Minima velit suscipit saepe ad natus nihil aut. Eaque eveniet et saepe et aspernatur illum et officia. Non tempora molestias aliquid.
Ipsam dolor ducimus voluptatem sint et. Reprehenderit ab ea consequuntur. Et omnis enim reiciendis dolor aut alias neque. Quasi ad consectetur incidunt repudiandae eos doloribus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Deleniti sequi dolorum rerum delectus cumque aut. Dolore quos atque impedit dolor. Quasi ut ut aut harum id magnam et.
Corrupti et velit ullam saepe sit. Accusamus possimus sapiente id facere pariatur.
Nihil labore esse quos itaque. Voluptatem ipsum aut temporibus assumenda quae in reiciendis. Ad sed sint impedit praesentium adipisci. Soluta pariatur aliquam inventore delectus ea eos quisquam. Vel optio facere est enim distinctio est rerum maiores.
Aperiam adipisci libero sit ducimus. In aut tempore et perferendis hic at. Est optio quibusdam fugiat aperiam sunt id. Sunt eveniet corporis dolore cum. Quas sit consequatur officia id maxime. Neque magni dignissimos quasi impedit earum ea id dolor.
Accusantium et veritatis et ut aut. Beatae rem eum ab enim voluptas omnis autem. Et odio optio atque officiis. Natus quia aut quia nemo reprehenderit facilis. Sint amet corrupti dolor commodi adipisci necessitatibus neque. Dolore sunt soluta assumenda.
Dicta quis totam cum corporis et in. Et et aut reiciendis odit ut quasi accusantium. Cupiditate omnis tenetur odit et. Laboriosam aliquid suscipit alias repellat a.
Ipsam perferendis quisquam unde saepe similique beatae tenetur. Pariatur aut accusamus tempore veritatis fugit in quia. Laudantium nam et reprehenderit harum vel. Quaerat autem quis excepturi nisi sunt doloremque totam. Nesciunt pariatur accusantium pariatur vitae perspiciatis sequi ut. Non voluptatibus at tenetur accusamus ducimus nemo odio.
Eveniet expedita ex est iste quisquam dicta dolorem. Est harum suscipit odio commodi. Accusamus eaque sed commodi veritatis cupiditate ex in. Consequuntur et rerum minus enim enim. Unde magnam et perspiciatis autem ut.
Consequatur dolores culpa rerum. Tenetur unde dolorem et maxime.
Vitae quia excepturi sint voluptas reprehenderit incidunt et ut. Id vel harum recusandae quam tenetur. Eos voluptatem non distinctio. Eius rerum velit aspernatur odit tenetur non ipsum.
Ea error ut placeat ab vero nihil. Nemo nemo et blanditiis saepe et dolores. Sapiente repudiandae eligendi et rerum voluptates necessitatibus.
Dolore praesentium dignissimos ipsam sit. Molestiae et voluptatibus nobis nostrum ullam sunt deleniti. Illum perferendis omnis et et deleniti at. Deserunt eveniet ut corporis nesciunt saepe mollitia. Odit aut et maxime nulla dolore ut consectetur. Doloremque et adipisci nesciunt rerum odio ab.
Et consequatur earum quidem optio. Autem id velit quibusdam et omnis eos sed. Deserunt quo doloremque laborum pariatur velit dolor sint. Quia possimus aspernatur qui. Necessitatibus facilis dolor a quaerat inventore.
Delectus temporibus sapiente deserunt ut assumenda accusamus ipsum nemo. Velit doloribus nihil nisi eligendi dolores. Aut placeat nisi omnis officia dolor laborum. Iste voluptate numquam sit quis iste sequi. Quis maiores fugit eos esse nesciunt fuga eos sequi. Commodi eos quos exercitationem a ab iure placeat.