Carry comp MF vs (U)MM

Does anyone have insights on how carry programs compare across fund sizes and how they scale with the size? Is carry compared in percentage points or actual $? In other words, will the guy working at a $10bn fund get 10x more $ carry than the guy at a $1bn fund (assuming all else equal) or will he simply get a smaller percentage points of a higher $ carry (also because the larger fund has to feed more mouths)?

 

2% carry at the VP level is unheard of at UMM/MF haha...more like 0.125% if you're lucky

 

This is speculative but something I've been thoughtful about: I think it's closer to 1% and likely below based on cash equivalent targets (more so the more mature a company). Once upon a time I put together a spreadsheet for personal interest on this, but say you have a $10bn fund with 15 MDs, 10 Directors, and 10 VPs, it's tough to imagine VPs commanding 20% of the carry pool.

 

So how should we think about total carry allocation? Does literally 100% of it get distributed to deal team(s) (i.e. any corporate costs are covered via mgmt fees)? What's an indicative split at partner / MD / VP level?

Thinking back to larger funds likely have more people hence carry needs to be split across more people - which would go back to a similar $ comp? And the sweet spot would therefore be to go for highest AuM / Fund size per employee?

 

Obviously not all funds approach this the same way, but most people think about vp carry in terms of dollars at work, not basis points. While larger funds provide more dollars at work (in general) the relationship is in no way linear. Just like an associate at a 10b fund will in general earn more comp than an associate at a $1b fund, but not 10x more, a VP at a bigger fund will generally have more $s at work, but not in proportion to AUM or fund size. 
 

In my experience, 1x base and bonus for 3-4 years in dollars at work is in the ballpark for a VP, but you see plenty of variation in that metric. 

 

As I said, the above is in the ballpark based on my experience but is light for a MF and it varies a lot firm to firm. 
 

In terms of the comments below, Can’t say it doesn’t happen, but I’d be surprised if an underperforming fund offered more $ at work, after all everybody expects their next fund to be their best fund 

 

The other variable to consider is fund performance. Even if you have more $ at work in a MF, it's becoming increasingly hard to drive outsized returns in that segment of the market. Not saying this happens all the time, but there are certainly scenarios where a VP at a top performing MM fund can end up with carry that's worth more than a VP at a below average MF

 
Most Helpful

All very true.

For example look at Veritas which has historically been viewed as a MM (not even UMM) fund and absolutely crushes their returns… vs say Apax, which up until about 5-7 years ago was viewed as a top of the food chain MF… but has had very subpar performance.

What really helps IMO is stability of returns. If you can consistently crank 2x MOIC you actually know what the carry is worth. If it whips around a bunch, you stand the risk of getting small carry (at VP level) when a fund vintage crush’s it and big carry (at partner level) which fund vintage sucks wind. Your fate is tied to the fund performance. So how much would it suck to get the massive wealth creation carry allocation in the laggard fund.

 

Veniam laudantium at aut labore nesciunt at omnis. Sed in laborum atque iure. Consequatur temporibus non quam laboriosam fugit rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”