Most Helpful

One major thing that Cash EBITDA includes is change in deferred revenue. That is, EBITDA only captures the revenues able to be recognized by GAAP but not bookings made that you have received cash for that aren't yet able to be recognized as revenue. Cash EBITDA takes EBITDA and adds change in deferred revenue.

Then when you bridge from Cash EBITDA to FCF, you remove deferred revenue from the change in net working capital calculation to avoid double counting. Why not just leave it in change in NWC and not bother calculating the Cash EBITDA if you get to the same FCF either way? It's because investors, especially debt investors, are often interested in a leverage metric on EBITDA that more closely approximates cash. Leverage will therefore look lower on a Cash EBITDA basis compared to EBITDA but be more "accurate" in terms of cash flow.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
 

What are you on about here? Maybe you're on the right track, but your way of explaining is off / confusing. Change in deferred revenue is an operating cash flow activity. Increases/decreases in deferred revenue happen to get reflected in the GAAP revenue, which impacts EBITDA.

But Cash EBITDA as the term implies reflects the cash portions of revenue and expenses. A good example here is interest that can be paid in cash and PIK, in the Cash EBITDA, PIK component of interest would not be added. 

 

- Usual definition: EBITDA + change in Deferred Revenue. IB does this

Slightly more technically correct definition: Billings used instead of Revenue, and then expenses are applied as normal to get down to EBITDA. Sellside accounting firms will do this. Comes out to the same answer as above

- Very very correct definition but only used if you're on the buyside: Cash EBITDA + change in DR - change in deferred commissions. If you're treating the Rev on a cash basis you shouldn't then get the benefit of the sales commissions being spread over multiple years. Sellside will never do this but sponsors and their accounting DD advisors will sometimes do this

 

Cash EBITDA is a measure of a company's operating performance that takes into account both its cash flow and its earnings. Unlike traditional EBITDA, which focuses only on earnings, Cash EBITDA also takes into account the amount of cash generated by a company in order to provide a more comprehensive view of its financial health and performance. In general, Cash EBITDA is considered to be a more useful measure than traditional EBITDA, as it provides investors with information about a company's ability to repay its debts and cover its operating costs.

EBITDA and EBITDA are two different financial metrics that are often used to measure a company's performance. While EBITDA is typically defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), the meaning of EBITDA can vary depending on the industry or context in which it is being used. In general, though, EBITDA is used as a way to measure a company's profitability and operational efficiency.

There are a few key differences between EBITDA and EBITDA. First, EBITDA includes depreciation and amortization in its calculation, while EBITDA does not. Depreciation and amortization are non-cash expenses, meaning that they cannot be used to directly pay off any existing debts. As such, EBITDA is typically viewed as a more accurate representation of a company's cash flows and financial performance.

 

 

Dolores et et dolor aliquam esse explicabo. Vitae suscipit pariatur odit dolores ut vel totam. Sequi aut vero labore. Molestiae laborum consequuntur perferendis omnis tempora aliquam. Dignissimos dolorem quibusdam omnis voluptas eaque magni cum. Ipsa in iusto maiores ea quia ut reiciendis.

Nostrum qui molestias sint qui eum molestias. Corrupti cum exercitationem est et et ut. Sequi deserunt rerum voluptas velit eveniet quod. Sit delectus dolorum id impedit.

Omnis laborum voluptatum eos atque eaque architecto. Soluta dolorum eum ut quo est repudiandae qui. Voluptatem velit reprehenderit est et. Quibusdam quaerat quia nobis itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”