Cash flow props...

Hey folks,

Wondering if someone can clear this up for me…couldn’t find any answers online or in previous threads.

I’m doing multi-method valuation and had just prepared FCFF for discounting when something started bugging my mind… When calculating the yearly cash movements for a firm why do I use FCFE and not the sum of the cash from operations, cash from investing and cash from financing? FCFE includes debt financing but not equity financing… In other words, why are movements in equity not included in cash flow movements when they do in fact provide liquidity - for example through the issuance of equity?

Hope someone can put this analysts head to rest…

Many thanks,
Choppie

 
Most Helpful

If you’re doing a basic DCF, then you shouldn’t use either of the cash flows you mentioned above. You should be using Unlevered Free Cash Flow (UFCF), which is equal to “EBIT*(1-Tax Rate) + Depreciation and Amortization - Change in Net Working Capital - Capital Expenditures”. When doing valuation, we typically want to start with the value of the entire firm is, which is the Enterprise Value. With UFCF, it is the amount of cash flow available to ALL investors after operations have been funded. As you can see from the formula above, any cash flows from debt or equity are NOT captured in UFCF. If you were to use Levered Free Cash Flow, which you called FCFE, then we would get the Equity Value of the firm, which is cash flow available to equity investors AFTER mandatory debt payments have been met. We would never use the final formula you mentioned (Operating Cash Flow + Investing + Financing) to do valuation because it’s not wholly attributable to the equity investor group.

Array
 

Pariatur placeat reprehenderit at architecto dolor rerum assumenda. Iste quae nihil ipsa voluptatem et optio sequi. Vero explicabo dolores totam laborum.

Aut doloremque ea ad reprehenderit voluptatem aut eum. Eum et mollitia odit eaque atque nemo est consequuntur. Eveniet culpa repellendus unde iusto ipsum.

Vel natus optio non cum. Iure sint assumenda alias suscipit aut quis. Qui sint provident sed sequi sit est nesciunt. Repellendus ut libero at repellendus. Dolores sunt qui et non voluptates. Distinctio sint ut maiores nemo autem.

"Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”