Comp in top HFs vs top BBs

Hi,

I'm looking at an offer in rates trading at a top BB (think GS/MS) and a junior distressed debt trading offer from a top HF (think Citadel, DE Shaw, Fortress). Both positions are Associate-level and based in London.

Since I cannot figure out where I want to go based on the people/culture/job content (great at both places), I think I'm going to make my decision based simply on comp. Where should I expect to make more money down the road? I hear that HF's generally offer significantly better comp prospects, but was surprised to find that my first-year comp offer at the HF is actually less than at the BB.

Would appreciate your thoughts.

 

Can't offer you any advice here, but congrats on the very enviable offers. The most I can say, comp-wise, is that the HFs will probably pay you more for at least the first few years.

However, you do say that you can't decide where to go based on culture -- but I know people who worked at Shaw and people who worked at other banks and HFs, and Shaw's culture is just completely amazing (hours are more or less 8-5, bosses are very accommodating, work is relatively laid-back -- one trader tells me on slow days he'd put his feet up on his desk and watch Office reruns).

Certainly a much better culture than Citadel's, which is a very cutthroat place. Dunno about Fortress though.

 

So it's indeed shaw I'm looking at. I know the culture is amazing, but same is true (to an extent) for the BB trading desk I'm looking at.

Brisbane: so are you saying that after a few years banks pay more than hf's? If anything, I had expected the exact opposite.

 

One thing I'd consider is the exact nature of the role at Shaw. That fund is known to be a fairly model-driven shop, and that being said, many of their traders may be execution traders (making their trades according to the models) rather than discretionary traders.

Hopefully they've clarified what kind of trading you'd be doing. If this distinction between these two job functions matters to you, it should definitely play into your decision.

 

I actually really like rates as an asset class, and i also consider myself more of a macro than a micro guy.

Rickets: thx, that's a good point. This one fortunately is a real trading position involving judgment and instinct rather than pure model-following (it's part of their qualitative strategies).

 
desecrato:
Comp will be less at MS/GS, but you'll develop more contacts, and see how the other half works.

True, but how valuable do you think these contacts really are? I mean, it's nice and fun to have a network in the finance community, but what sort of opportunities would it ultimately open up? Prolly going to the buy-side, right? So I guess I might as well do that right away. Or are there other advantages of the broader network I'd develop on the sell-side?

 

Why does everyone on this board assume you have to trade flow first to make it to a prop desk at a sell-side firm? My bank, and at least a few others hire analysts to credit, rates, stat arb, securitized products, etc. proprietary trading desks through the rotational program. Additionally, this is not always as sexy as it seems since you are much more likely to be someone's lackee on these desk, than a flow desk. On a flow desk, the senior trader, WILL be on vacation, and some day you will have to be making prices. They have an incentive to teach you everything so you do not lose them money while they are gone. On a prop desk, they can just not trade while on vacation.

 

DE Shaw is clearly a fantastic firm, but dont forget that this is for their London office, which is only like 35 people or so including support staff. Pretty limited exposure, don't you think? Especially compared with a huge sell-side firm with excellent training programs etc.

Also Shaw's famous quant strategies are all run from NY, so i wont see any of that. They do seem to have the great Shaw culture going though (good hours, relaxed atmosphere, nice people).

What are your thoughts on this? Think I should nevertheless still definitely go with Shaw?

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”