Comparable Choice Problem
Hi everyone!
I'm performing the public comparable analysis of a commercial bank as a self-case of study and I chose the comparable banks with geographical, service, and size factors. I ended up with a good range of comparable, but while I was checking my group I discovered that a comparable bank was undertaking a takeover of another of mine comparable. The takeover will be performed gradually over the next three years.
My question is: Assuming that my group of comparable is composed by 5 bank comprised the one I'm valuing, can I use both the comparable even if a there is a takeover in the background? If it isn't advisable, what do you suggest? Can I use only 3 comp. or should I use another bank?
My problem principally arise by the fact that if I discard a comp. and I want to replace it with another comp. it would be either in an "infant-stage" or would not respect the geographical factor. Otherwise to use a big bank with a full range of service would be an error in my opinion.
I've tried to describe my situation as clear as possible. I'm not a professional and this one is my first attempt to perform a full valuation. Moreover, I've not access to any valuable instrument such as Bloomberg, Thomson One, or Capital IQ so have mercy of me!
Voluptatem sunt consequatur laudantium. Enim qui ut debitis veniam. Eum illo incidunt sint.
Dolor est rerum placeat. Dolorum dicta et alias. Laborum tenetur nisi non sit maxime.
Corporis ducimus sunt doloremque sed. Sint veniam quidem saepe eum perferendis. Cumque molestiae fugit corporis sapiente autem accusamus est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...