The situation is the following: an entire central/federal government gets replaced by McKinseyers, Bainers or BostonianConsulterGroupers.
I’d want to know what you guys think. Imo they would outperform many (if not all) actual governments.
| +29 | Nervous about MBB - incoming BA | 18 | 1d | |
| +11 | Premed to MBB Recruiting | 2 | 17h | |
| +10 | Chances at MBB - Reality Check | 1 | 1d | |
| +9 | Lateral to MBB from Investing Seat | 1 | 12h | |
| +6 | How much do your MDs make? | 1 | 4d | |
| +5 | Restructuring market | 4 | 1d | |
| +1 | Portfolio Operations Group--DFW area | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
It would quickly become like Venezuela
This is literally how every former command economy/regime started. A group of people thought they knew better than everyone else and were privy to some special level of knowledge - then proceeded in failing to account for every detail that is normally facilitated by free market mechanisms or otherwise self-correcting behavior.
Interestingly enough, you can hardly exclude the US from this list based on the way in which it was founded. It’s taken a while as the system was constructed better than most, but the cracks in our system are beginning to show themselves.
There were always cracks in the system, considering it claimed "all men are created equal" and then promptly counted black people as 3/5ths of a person. We fought a Civil War less than a century after the country was founded.
I agree with you in the result when their competences are increased to a point of dictatorship/planned economy. But my point is without exceeding the current competences: would they shift to communism/dictatorship or would they shift to free markets/libertarianism? I think if they are half the smart they like to show, they would hand over power back to the people towards libertarianism. Basically they would outperform every country just by laissez-faire.
The good news is there would be fewer wars started because the government would be too busy iterating on decks.
Pls fix <insert country name here>
Most of the government is pretty much zero value add anyway so I think it would look pretty much the same. On a more serious note, what value do you actually think these people would bring to a government? Super communication skills? Pretty presentations? Putting a group of people in charge of a society that have been playing without skin in the game their whole career seems like a recipe for disaster.
I think you meant to say negative value.
Mitt Romney was the Bain CEO and attempted to run a country.
Mitt, Pete, Tom Cotton, the Prime Ministers of Greece and Israel, and a whole lot more that I’m missing
New PM of Belgium is a BCGer too
Plenty of MBB alumni in politics. I think the point of the post though is if all government personnel were replaced by the entirety of a consulting firm.
If MBBers are good at something, it would be reducing cost. That way, you can maximize your profits, which would be budget surplus in the case of governments.
The US government has been running around a perpetual loss for decades except during the Clinton Admin. So MBBers could easily find ways to optimize the hell out of government efficiency.
For instance, like I've been saying all along, the US Federal government needs some serious restructuring done ASAP. There are dozens of agencies in every single area from law enforcement to public health and energy that seemingly do the exact same thing and always fight over their turf. All these agencies could easily be combined into few (some M&A action).
Would save us so much tax revenue that we can actually decrease tax rates without worrying about national debt.
Govt incentive is to spend money, though. But private consulting is the opposite.
imagine getting this as your 'public sector' case in an interview
I think there’s a question here about advice vs. execution.
I think MBB people would probably do a solid job of finding efficient solutions to problems, but implementing them by getting buy-in from stakeholders, operating a large-scale effort and all of the associated administrative tasks that would coincide with implementing a big policy? Not sure they have the skill set or experience.
But bankers on the other hand...
it would become an EXcel and PPT sweatshop, with decks as the only export, and Seamless orders as the only import
WTF an MBB running the country? It's a fuickin country not a company and I'm the biggest fuckin capitalist in the world and i'm willin to say that
they would have to consult these nuts
As an an MBB alumnus,
In the middle east we do :)
If you want to see how it works, hope over for a project or transfer ;)
they already do lol
Quisquam inventore magni sed enim dolorem. Ipsam molestias cumque quaerat eos. Sit repellat quibusdam impedit doloremque dolorum.
Reprehenderit vel incidunt eaque tempore ut. Cupiditate molestiae facere nulla consequatur dignissimos reiciendis. Tenetur excepturi ab quibusdam et nisi placeat labore impedit. Error quidem maxime voluptate optio hic vel numquam.
Dolores ut quia provident voluptatem eos molestiae facere. Deleniti ipsa accusantium vitae. Repudiandae dolor et perspiciatis praesentium a nam dolores perferendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Beatae recusandae nihil omnis et perferendis magnam consequatur. Ea sequi eos iure. Rerum esse omnis quia culpa vero autem.
Temporibus voluptatem omnis soluta exercitationem velit voluptas. Eum dolorem fuga qui doloribus culpa eos odit. Aliquid adipisci sit beatae quas eum.
Quidem ipsam incidunt qui repudiandae rerum nobis. Porro provident ab repellat omnis. Deserunt iusto cumque sint vel facilis dolores esse.
Harum est non omnis eaque. Laboriosam voluptatem aut provident fugit excepturi quasi reprehenderit. Sed eius qui culpa non. Ut corrupti quia et quo sint eaque nam.