Covenants

This is for discussion purposes (although it's a real life scenario that I'm discussing), but I was curious what the collective wisdom of WSO could come up with with regard to covenants and alternative financing:

Got a situation with a church where the congregation of 2,800 people voted 2,773 - 27 to leave its current denomination. The 27 dissenters who remained with the denomination successfully sued and, after 7 years, the courts granted the denomination the $26 million historical church building and displaced the now-3,000 church members.

The 27 people have grown to 200, but it's not nearly enough to maintain this 300-year-old church, so the denomination is looking to sell. I've got a friend who is hyper wealthy. I've heard him discuss the idea of buying the church and selling it back to the 3,000-person congregation at cost, more or less. The denomination refuses to sell the church back to the congregation that left. They may even put in the sales contract covenants forbidding the sale to the congregation for an undetermined number of years.

With regard to covenants, is it legally enforceable to sell someone property but prevent them from selling it to a certain group of people in the future? Could a congregation simply re-arrange itself in a different LLC or organizational structure to get around such a covenant? Also, are there any kind of alternative financing arrangements that might exist that would allow the buyer and then seller to get his money back but technically not transfer ownership/deed to the congregation?

Obviously, this is some pretty complicated real estate law, but figured I'd pose this question to some real estate guys to get their thoughts.

(Maybe I should post this question on JDOasis...)

 
Best Response

I have two suggestions for you scenario that may or may not work. I'm just a noobie in the game. A covenant could be put in place that would restrict use based on a certain use yielded from the real estate. Say a church sells the building with a covenant that the use be used for a charter school. I don't think it would be possible to prevent a certain group from purchasing a property. Mainly because a new LLC could be formed which would be an easy loophole.

Second suggestion I have in terms of title and outlay would be for your friend to purchase the property and fulfill a long term net lease with the church group fulfilling outlay over a period of time, or even a ground lease where your friend would own the land and the church group would own the building improvements.

 

You can never legally prevent anyone from owning anything. I mean you could structure an LLC, where they bring one outsider to manage the corporation. Then you can have a flow through from this LLC to the parent, which is own by the congregation that left. Its not even expensive to do this. I mean it's literally impossible to restrict someone unless the government has reasonable cause to, example would be someone convicted of insider trading purchasing a brokerage or something. Otherwise, nope, the congregation can very easily come back.

Array
 

Interesting discussion so far. I live in a county that has a lot of protected lands (lands that cannot be developed). The protections were made part of the deed. Therefore, buying and selling the property, while legal, is of no real benefit as no development can take place, so the land has little marketable value.

Is that materially different than an organization forbidding future sale to another organization in the sales contract?

 

Ea blanditiis sapiente doloremque voluptatum est. Perspiciatis atque temporibus aperiam dolorum qui eos. Quo magnam non ut sed facilis est et.

In asperiores pariatur assumenda voluptas dolor qui. Voluptatem magnam amet ut maxime corporis quas fuga atque. Voluptas accusamus officiis et neque. Et dolorem minus sit eum omnis asperiores possimus impedit. Illum sit illum aut maiores quam accusamus.

Aut suscipit culpa et veritatis ad. Voluptas unde ipsa officiis accusamus laboriosam. Quas perferendis fugiat repellat molestias fuga ea eaque. Aliquam cum et quos omnis voluptatibus consequatur perferendis.

Debitis voluptas hic corporis cupiditate. Est minima libero accusantium et corrupti perferendis. Vitae nam sunt omnis consequuntur illum non. Dolorem itaque aliquid autem facilis.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”