CRE Lending Careers

I have had a hard time finding reviews of the different commercial real estate lending platforms so I am asking here and hoping we can build this out to be pretty inclusive of the different opportunities: (Let's take major PERE funds out of the picture for this)

Is it better to be at a BB than a MM? What about special purpose lending groups like Torchlight etc.?
Is it better to focus on CMBS or balance sheet or both?
What are the pay, hours, and exit opps like for the different variations of CRE lending?
Is this a roller coaster career path?

Thanks in advance.

 
Best Response

Is it better to be at a BB than a MM? Conventional wisdom would dictate that you'd always be better off working on bigger loans.

Is it better to focus on CMBS or balance sheet or both? Usually CMBS lenders make more, because of the gain upon selling/securitizing those loans. I remember a local banker wistfully hoping outloud that they could start doing more conduit deals, because bonuses would be higher. Even at the analyst level, comp seems to be higher doing CMBS in NY than, say, balance sheet lending at a life company.

What are the pay, hours, and exit opps like for the different variations of CRE lending? I would argue that hours are pretty easy unless you're on the CMBS side, especially in New York. I think all-nighters do happen sometimes in that business, according to someone I talked to a couple months ago.

Is this a roller coaster career path? Yes, like a lot of things in commercial real estate. One caveat, however, that can soften the downturn is that even if transaction activity is nonexistent, you'll always have existing debt out there that can be or needs to be refinanced.

 

As someone who has worked in on both balance sheet and CMBS loans, I can provide a little insight.

With regard to the BB vs MM, I wouldn't say that larger loans are the better route to go by default. It really depends on what you are looking to get out of it. CMBS is a very volatile industry, and once you get to the really large deals ($75-100MM+) its even more volatile. On the positive side, the larger deals will get you credibility within the industry because they will be recognizable. But when things turn bad, the large loan market turns worse. This is all assuming that you are referring to origination/securitization/underwriting roles in CMBS. Servicing and special servicing are completely different.

Balance sheet is much less volatile and bonuses are not as good. But job security is less of an issue. As prospie said, you will always have to manage your own portfolio of debt, and thus it is less volatile. In CMBS, if you are on the origination side, you do not manage the loan after you make it. A servicing shop will pick it up and take over once the securitization has closed.

From an exit opp perspective, CMBS will give you more street cred than BS lending, but not as much as REIB on Wall Street. CMBS is a very high volume business where you get to review tons of deals. This lets you learn about many different product types and markets. Balance sheet lending has lower volume. It requires lots of analysis of the guarantor in addition to the real estate since most loans being made are recourse. You get deeper "into the weeds" in balance sheet lending because you manage the same deals for years. Thats not to say you don't do deep analysis in CMBS, but you learn more about individual deals in balance sheet lending because there are fewer deals, and you manage them for a longer period of time.

 
MBAREALESTATE:
As someone who has worked in on both balance sheet and CMBS loans, I can provide a little insight.

With regard to the BB vs MM, I wouldn't say that larger loans are the better route to go by default. It really depends on what you are looking to get out of it. CMBS is a very volatile industry, and once you get to the really large deals ($75-100MM+) its even more volatile. On the positive side, the larger deals will get you credibility within the industry because they will be recognizable. But when things turn bad, the large loan market turns worse. This is all assuming that you are referring to origination/securitization/underwriting roles in CMBS. Servicing and special servicing are completely different.

Balance sheet is much less volatile and bonuses are not as good. But job security is less of an issue. As prospie said, you will always have to manage your own portfolio of debt, and thus it is less volatile. In CMBS, if you are on the origination side, you do not manage the loan after you make it. A servicing shop will pick it up and take over once the securitization has closed.

From an exit opp perspective, CMBS will give you more street cred than BS lending, but not as much as REIB on Wall Street. CMBS is a very high volume business where you get to review tons of deals. This lets you learn about many different product types and markets. Balance sheet lending has lower volume. It requires lots of analysis of the guarantor in addition to the real estate since most loans being made are recourse. You get deeper "into the weeds" in balance sheet lending because you manage the same deals for years. Thats not to say you don't do deep analysis in CMBS, but you learn more about individual deals in balance sheet lending because there are fewer deals, and you manage them for a longer period of time.

My impression has been that people with CMBS experience have less street cred because CMBS underwriting is more formulaic and less intensive than balance sheet UW at a bank.

Why do RE PE shops target RE IB'ers? I feel like all RE Ibankers do is help REITs raise capital via ECM/DCM. Valuable experience for sure, but how is this relevant experience for property level investing at places like lone star or apollo?

 
Dr Barnaby Fulton:
Why do RE PE shops target RE IB'ers? I feel like all RE Ibankers do is help REITs raise capital via ECM/DCM. Valuable experience for sure, but how is this relevant experience for property level investing at places like lone star or apollo?
Who said anything about relevance? This is the financial services industry, relevance has no place here.
 
ToBeOrNotToBe:
Thanks MBARealestate.

Can you shed some light on typical salaries for CMBS vs. balance sheet associates and VPs? Assuming that CMBS will recover back to around, say $70-100Bn in annual issuance, what kind of base/bonus are you looking at if you jump in at the associate level and work your way up?

I think that to a large extent, this depends on the firm. Some CMBS shops still haven't fully built out yet and don't have VP's. For associate level I would guess that salaries would be in the range of $80K-100K depending on the culture of the company (i.e work hours) with bonuses at 50% to 75% of base. The salary level could be higher if you are hired out of some sort of post mba associate program that pays street associate salary ($120K I think), but most shops haven't gotten to the point where they are recruiting MBAs.

I'd say that for balance sheet associates are probably $70-80K with a 10-30% bonus.

 

I haven't followed real estate much since I graduated in 08, but looking to get into the industry so please excuse the noob type question.

Who are the major players these days in both CMBS and Balance Sheet lending?

 
NealCaffrey:
do these companies also have a strong presence in the mezzanine space or is that a different group of key players? if so then who are they?
I don't know about all the investment banks mentioned (probably not these days), but most of those lenders seem a little conservative to play in the mezz space in the current market. One that I can think of is Ladder Capital, or at least they say they offer mezz.

These guys are few and far between nowadays - a bunch of mezz sources closed their doors after the crash - and are extremely picky, so I don't think there's a lot of deal flow right now. I do think some deals are getting done in multifamily.

I'd be curious to hear about others, though.

 

In the mezzanine and high-yield debt space, you've got a couple of categories of major players. You've got shops that specialize in high-yield debt and raise private equity vehicles to buy it. These are firm's like Five Mile Capital, Mesa West, Prime Finance, H/2, RCG Longview, etc.

Then you've got the major PE and REPE sponsors who either buy high-yield debt through their straight equity fund, or have side funds that focus on debt. Blackstone, Lone Star, Rockwood, and Colony all do a lot of debt work (Blackstone, has a group called "BREDS" that focuses on high yield debt). Some of the big real estate asset managers have high yield debt arms or are trying to build them. Prudential (PREI) started a mezz team a few years ago; RREEF has been active here for a while I think.

Also, the debt REITs typically do a lot of mezz lending. Firms like Northstar and Annaly have been in this space for a while. Then many of the private equity firms like Starwood and Apollo got into the space a few years ago and launched their own debt REITs.

 
re-ib-ny:
In the mezzanine and high-yield debt space, you've got a couple of categories of major players. You've got shops that specialize in high-yield debt and raise private equity vehicles to buy it. These are firm's like Five Mile Capital, Mesa West, Prime Finance, H/2, RCG Longview, etc.

Then you've got the major PE and REPE sponsors who either buy high-yield debt through their straight equity fund, or have side funds that focus on debt. Blackstone, Lone Star, Rockwood, and Colony all do a lot of debt work (Blackstone, has a group called "BREDS" that focuses on high yield debt). Some of the big real estate asset managers have high yield debt arms or are trying to build them. Prudential (PREI) started a mezz team a few years ago; RREEF has been active here for a while I think.

Also, the debt REITs typically do a lot of mezz lending. Firms like Northstar and Annaly have been in this space for a while. Then many of the private equity firms like Starwood and Apollo got into the space a few years ago and launched their own debt REITs.

Great overview of the different firms. Thank you

If anyone knows how to get into the above, please let us know (ie. campus recruiting, lateral moves out of ib, etc.)

 
re-ib-ny:
In the mezzanine and high-yield debt space, you've got a couple of categories of major players. You've got shops that specialize in high-yield debt and raise private equity vehicles to buy it. These are firm's like Five Mile Capital, Mesa West, Prime Finance, H/2, RCG Longview, etc.

Then you've got the major PE and REPE sponsors who either buy high-yield debt through their straight equity fund, or have side funds that focus on debt. Blackstone, Lone Star, Rockwood, and Colony all do a lot of debt work (Blackstone, has a group called "BREDS" that focuses on high yield debt). Some of the big real estate asset managers have high yield debt arms or are trying to build them. Prudential (PREI) started a mezz team a few years ago; RREEF has been active here for a while I think.

Also, the debt REITs typically do a lot of mezz lending. Firms like Northstar and Annaly have been in this space for a while. Then many of the private equity firms like Starwood and Apollo got into the space a few years ago and launched their own debt REITs.

If these are the types of companies who buy the high yield/mezz debt, who are the originators? Also, is this set up as a correspondent type relationship?

 

Well, the megafunds with RE debt arms (Blackstone, Lone Star), opportunity funds (Rockwood, Colony, Starwood, Apollo), and the PE-esque debt funds like Five Mile are all more or less looking for RE IB analysts.

The institutional investor / asset manager groups like PREI and RREEF sometimes hire on campus and tend to be less picky about taking RE IB analysts. That's also because they're not willing to pay to hire people from those backgrounds, so comp is lower.

Don't know too much about debt REIT hiring.

 

Currently an FHA UW'ER @ $120k all in w/ bonus. Can be mundane and repetitious at times, depends on the deal(s). Nothing to complain about 40-45 hr work weeks. I see alot of LIHTC deals, market rate stuff, section 8, etc., some of which can get complicated (221d4's). Origination pulls in the big bucks but seems to be a hard niche to create. My previous boss said CRE is like surfing, catch a wave and ride it. I'm beginning to think the FHA wave has crested and am keeping my options open. Hope that helps.

 

Voluptate recusandae et incidunt velit. Cum dolores quidem voluptas. In facere amet et quia molestias. Autem impedit voluptatibus eveniet.

Et velit labore autem velit nemo. Ad eos veniam nihil beatae est quia. Excepturi dolorem explicabo dolor et vitae necessitatibus est dolore. Autem et architecto et perferendis et harum. Voluptas dolor suscipit ea quos. Neque incidunt dolorem quaerat rem nihil.

Voluptates non dicta iusto natus ullam. Velit sunt debitis qui odit. Pariatur nemo eos assumenda reprehenderit. Dignissimos ratione id non consequatur quo. Alias fugit sed culpa quisquam quis occaecati.

 

Ab aut voluptatem dolorem architecto modi vel consequatur. Vel earum sed aut praesentium sed illum doloribus iusto. Et magnam eum saepe modi. Eligendi magnam reprehenderit facere ratione. Quaerat explicabo ipsa non dolor ratione odio quo.

Dolor non nam repellendus sed harum modi. Et blanditiis dolores ad odio. Ea perspiciatis velit saepe magni accusantium quod in. Dolorum totam architecto dignissimos commodi qui dignissimos dolores. Non assumenda dolorum qui distinctio reprehenderit autem sunt doloremque. Et alias omnis omnis inventore animi impedit eos aut.

Praesentium esse nostrum asperiores facilis dolorem aut unde. A repellendus quo accusamus aut quis quam rerum architecto. Perspiciatis sint sed et neque. Sed vel dignissimos ut doloribus nihil tempora. Consequatur et aut voluptatem explicabo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”