$300k I can see -- $500k for a 2nd yr analyst is highly unlikely but not technically impossible in the following scenario:

1) kid is an absolute rockstar. He/she gets on the desk, and is running the entire process out of the gate

2) maybe they brought in a big deal and is already sourcing with their relationships so they brought in $1mm in fees and/or

3) maybe this was the only way CS could hold onto him/her since he/she had multiple megafund PE offers + other options?

If this M&A analyst sees this post and wants to confirm it anonymously with me, just shoot me a PM or email and I will confirm it to the WSO community so that everyone can give you a big congrats...

https://media0.giphy.com/media/g9582DNuQppxC/giphy-downsized.gif" alt="congrats" />

 

Patrick,

The only way that kind of salary works is in scenario 2. While I think that scenario one is plausible, it's not 500K/Year plausible, let alone 300K/Year. As far as scenario 3 is concerned, that kind of pay raise might set the expectations for other analysts in that position at CS and artificially raise comp as a result.

The thing with scenario 2 is that they need to have a pipeline of deals in the works or have brought in enough revenue to justify that kind of salary. Bringing in $1MM in fees just seems too low to justify that kind of payout. Depending on the fee scale, we're talking between 45MM and 100MM for the deal size. That just seems unusual. Just thinking about it from a brokerage commission perspective, becase it's the easiest way to look at the justified cost. Now, don't quote me on this for M&A transaction splits, but on the brokerage side, most firms fee schedule reflects the production level of the employee. Splits range anywhere form 77%/23% to as high as 48%42%. If this is their first deal, getting a 50/50% seems way out of the ordinary. I'd argue that the split is closer to 77%/23%, so if they earn $500K/Year, they have to be generating ~4.5MM in fees (against ~450MM in total deal size) to justify that salary. However, I'm sure that this offer has to be contingent on their continued generation of new business as well. There is just way too much variability here to make me believe that it's true. And this is also before any other fees that may be taken out of the earnings. So that number could easily double. If this is a rockstar analyst whos doing that, I'd believe it in a heartbeat. But, I'm skeptical.

Now, if this was an MD in Equity Research, where the Analyst title is common, I'd believe that in a heartbeat.

 

Based on what I know, CS has some sort of program where analysts/associates can earn some kind of credit towards deal revenues even if they don't actually bring it in themselves. Its meant to rewards the one to initially find the company/generate some type of idea that leads to a successful pitch.

Not sure on the specifics as it was explained pretty briefly by someone I knew who had summered there junior year. Seemed like even they were kind of confused by it, but it's a potential explanation for why one individual's comp might have been so high.

 

For #1 how does a person prove himself/herself to be that competent at that junior of a level? Doesn't make sense given industry standards. What do you say while negotiating? I can't imagine anything but that person sounding very obnoxious, which wouldn't get him/her very good points on personality.

 

Placeat nam facere modi consectetur iusto harum. Omnis est libero et dolorem dolorem vitae. Non at quia aut dignissimos corrupti.

Saepe sapiente corrupti voluptas debitis et vitae consequatur. Provident nihil quia doloremque perferendis dicta enim. Culpa vero possimus similique aut. Enim assumenda aperiam possimus dolore et rerum placeat. Totam perferendis delectus consequatur qui. Esse quasi dolore aspernatur et. Sit dolor ut fugit veniam.

Don't @ me
 

Praesentium occaecati iure perferendis esse libero illum. Accusantium dolor dolorum rerum in et impedit eos. Consequuntur dolor sit laborum ut in necessitatibus voluptas. Id cum nesciunt expedita qui facere odit.

Delectus dolore impedit est esse. Ut deserunt asperiores earum aut et ea nostrum. Ex rerum quidem rerum iure reprehenderit sit. Doloribus qui qui odio et nulla et velit. Eaque quidem blanditiis sed ratione enim architecto quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”