One of the big catalysts driving the need for more advanced cyber security has been the shift to cloud computing. Complex systems are proving difficult to protect. That’s where network security comes into play. FireEye Inc ( NASDAQ:FEYE ) is one of the 3 Top Cybersecurity Stocks for 2017 .

http://www.profitconfidential.com/stocks/three-top-cybersecurity-stocks-for-2017/
 
Best Response

yep, Fireeye is another one and the list goes on... there are also tons of startups and even some VCs that are purely focused on security firms... valuation is definitely a concern. another thing is sale to enterprises where the money is actually made (B2C less differentiated). what we have seen is that especially in the cyber security space, products are very sticky and highly embedded in the organisations so traditional players (symantec, mcafee) have much better position since firms prefer not to risk much (also question of switching costs). new players thus have much more difficult situation to penetrate the enterprise sector... in B2C, a security company should have a distribution partner (think of prenstalled symantec on a new Dell or acer computer) to hit it big (but that is something that cost a load of money..) .... just my 2c to get the discussion going

 

I'm not saying there are no value plays out there but security has been of a great focus for the last several years. The difference now versus a few years ago is it has greater traction in the media. If nothing else the Target hack of 2013 would have been the better launch point.

Good luck!

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
 

I think even in B2B firms will need to rely on resellers as a sales channel even more than in the past. the increasing complexity in security means that there's more products that enterprises need to cover themselves, but I highly doubt that one or two products will be a cure all for every enterprises' need. My guess is Symantec and McAfee are going to lose share as the market gets more fragmented and the winners in my opinion are the resellers who do the work of differentiating the product for enterprises. Blackstone's investment in Accuvant is a good example

 

that sounds like a good strategy, especially if one believes that companies will start adopting large product suits which would open space for resellers. quite curious how this will play out mid-term..

 

Cyber is wrongly grouped as a part of high growth software like CRM, SPLK, etc. The industry is changing from fragmentation to consolidation from North to South and incorporating East to West products into 1 bundle.

Valuations are ridiculous and you're buying a lottery ticket. Look @ CYBR, has maybe a 2bn TAM and trading @ 10+ EV/S and the product sucks. The space's avg EV/S is 6.7, which is what high growth software was trading @ last year (CRM, SPLK, etc).

PANW FEYE are the rock stars due to product traction in gov space and that's where the tailwind is for impending budget years and public and private data sharing initiatives. CHKP, SYMC and the older cyber firms are losing market share due to lack of innovation and picking wrong products to use RD spend.

CSCO will be buyers when valuations come back to earth, in meantime swing trade them off catalysts.

 

knowing that it's from seagate already raises my opinion of this product. they just have to team up with corning and get the ultimate protective casing so...wait, they already did?

 

Honestly, I hate this. I hate the fact people call him a paranoid instead of calling him a hypocrite. His whole business revolves on getting information on people's lives and "helping" them make friends and get relevant information based on their likes albeit with the users permission but still.

I vote 0. And if you're so afraid of hackers just install a linux distribution and poof most of your security problems are gone.

 

Rem a harum deserunt nostrum hic consequuntur eos. Exercitationem ut a et. Iure et itaque repellat odit dolorem dicta est. Aliquid deserunt id soluta tempora voluptatum voluptatem.

 

Quam modi aut dignissimos et. Consequuntur aspernatur officia iusto esse aliquid. Nam reiciendis quo quo facere dolor alias cum.

Tenetur qui sunt placeat itaque eum blanditiis. Commodi in nisi natus minima autem expedita sed. In dignissimos ullam ut dolorem rerum. Eos commodi est sit voluptate.

Rem quia voluptatem velit ut. Aut dolores in mollitia doloremque sint optio. Laboriosam est voluptas voluptatibus delectus voluptatem temporibus dolorum. Necessitatibus dolores dicta nostrum.

Nesciunt ab ducimus magnam sint non aliquam. Enim libero dolor unde quia. Iusto sequi aliquid nihil laborum dolorem dicta amet. Dolorem voluptatem quisquam maiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”